Its about the children! 3 1 Regional Advisory Committee Meeting - PDF document

Regional Advisory Committee Meeting Presentation October 23 ‐ 25, 2011 1 Accountability Principles MISSOURI SCHOOL 4 IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Regional Advisory Committee Meeting Accountability System Design Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Meeting 1 of 1 Taken from Center for Assessment Presentation: Designing Next Generation Accountability Systems: Big Picture. September 29,2011 MSIP Advisory Committee Meetings Core Components 2 5  Goals Kansas City – October 24  Performance Indicators Poplar Bluff – October 24  Design Decisions  Rewards, Consequences and Supports Springfield – October 25  System Evaluation, Monitoring and Continuous St. Louis – October 25 Improvement Moberly – October 26 Goal Identification 6 Identify EVERY school EVERY school Lowest 5% is “Good needs to Get and Provide Enough” Better Drastic Drastic Intervention and Assistance It’s about the children! 3 1

Regional Advisory Committee Meeting Presentation October 23 ‐ 25, 2011 Small Group Discussion Status vs. Improvement 7 10 High Status High Status Low Growth High Growth Low Status Low Status Low Growth High Growth Small Group Activity Design Decisions 8 11 Consequences  Status vs. Growth Consequences Status Growth of Growth of Status  Differentiated vs. Standardized  Simple/Transparent vs. Complex/Precise  Focused Resources vs. Resources for All  Focused Resources vs Resources for All _______ % _______% Consider desired distributions of student scores, Small Group Activity accounting for target & variance among students 12 Consequences Consequences of of Differentiated Standardized Standardized Differentiated College and Accountability Accountability y career ready End B – most/all End A – benchmark End C – students on most/all most/all target, variance _______ % _______% students on students on same as start Starting target, little target, more (could change score variance point variance relative position) Adapted from Center for Assessment Presentation: Designing Next Generation Accountability Systems: Big Picture. September 29,2011 2

Regional Advisory Committee Meeting Presentation October 23 ‐ 25, 2011 Small Group Discussion Small Group Activity 13 16 Consequences Consequences Simple/ Complex/ of Simple/ of Complex/ Transparent Precise Transparent Precise Systems Systems y _______ % _______% Small Group Activity 14 Consequences Consequences Focused Resources of Department of Focused Resources for All Resources for Department all Resources _______ % _______% Bringing It All Together 15  How can multiple elements come together into a clear coherent system?  Balance the desire for simplicity and flexibility  Aligned to policy priorities (e g the metrics and  Aligned to policy priorities (e.g. the metrics and weights support state values)  Support the need for utility (e.g. results that inform practice) 3