gravitational wave detector
play

gravitational wave detector Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ando Lab Seminar November 28, 2019 Science with even smaller scale space gravitational wave detector Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo Contents Introduction - Deci-hertz GW astronomy - How to proceed with DECIGO


  1. Ando Lab Seminar November 28, 2019 Science with even smaller scale space gravitational wave detector Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo

  2. Contents • Introduction - Deci-hertz GW astronomy - How to proceed with DECIGO • Recap of F-DECIGO plan (60 km, 2 kg) - Concept - Science cases (including dark matter) • FF-DECIGO plan (100 m, 100 g) - Background - Concept - Science cases (especially stochastic background) - Possibility of longer arms • Summary 2

  3. Deci-hertz GW Astronomy • Even more interest after the dawn of GW astronomy - Intermediate-mass BH - IMRIs - White dwarf binary and Type Ia SNe - Stochastic background - Dark matter search (Ultralight boson from BH superradiance) 3 arXiv:1908.11375

  4. Detectors We Usually Discuss LISA: https://perf-lisa.in2p3.fr/ KAGRA: PRD 97, 122003 (2018) TianQin: arXiv:1902.04423 (from Yi-Ming Hu) aLIGO: LIGO-T1800044 B-DECIGO: PTEP 2016, 093E01 (2016) ET: http://www.et-gw.eu/index.php/etdsdocument CE: CQG 34, 044001 (2017) TianQin LISA KAGRA B-DECIGO aLIGO Einstein Telescope Cosmic Explorer 4

  5. Other Proposals • There are so many proposals in deci-hertz band (this is not a complete list at all!) 5

  6. Zoo of Proposals • DECIGO CQG 28, 094011 (2011) • ALIA arXiv:1907.11305 (post LISA, 500,000 km) • BBO CQG 23 4887 (2006) (post LISA, 50,000 km) • TOBA PRL 105, 161101 (2010) (10m torsion bar) • GEOGRAWI arXiv:1111.2576 (73,000 km LISA) -> gLISA arXiv:1608.04790 • GADFLI arXiv:1111.3708 (73,000 km LISA) • LAGRANGE arXiv:1111.5264 (660,000 km LISA) • OMEGA white paper (2011) (1,000,000 km LISA) • SAGE arXiv:1811.04743 (Sagnac interferometer) • AMIGO arXiv:1709.05659 • MAGIS arXiv:1711.02225 (atom interferometer) • Taiji arXiv:1807.09495 (almost LISA) • INO arXiv:1809.10317 (optical lattice clocks) • SAGE arXiv:1907.03867 (atom interferometer or atomic clocks) • TianGO arXiv:1908.06004 (100 km, 10 kg Michelson with squeezing) • DO arXiv:1908.11375 (1e8 m LISA, Voyage2050) • SOGRO IJMPD 28, 1940001 (2019) (superconducting) 6

  7. Comparison of Proposals • Wei-Tou Ni, IJMPD 25, 1630001 (2016) • Almost every proposal is LISA-type 7

  8. How to Proceed with DECIGO? • There’s a high possibility that DECIGO require international collaboration • But almost all the other proposals are LISA-type • Fabry-Pérot type pathfinder is necessary to show the feasibility, and we might be the only ones who think it is necessary • We want to do it quick and yet we want to do some science → Small-scale mission ( 公募型小型 ) Launch with Epsilon rocket 150 億円 8

  9. Meeting on Nov 21, 2019 @ JAXA • Akutsu-san, Izumi-san, Ito-san, Shoda-san, me • Meeting to define DECIGO mission 9

  10. やばいものリスト • Fabrication and handling of large mirror • Telescope - Inside or outside of the cavity ? - Adaptive optics ? • Inertial sensor and thruster • Length sensing and control vs orbit • Link acquisition • Force / acceleration noise requirement 10

  11. やばいものリスト • Fabrication and handling of large mirror • Telescope - Inside or outside of the cavity ? - Adaptive optics ? • Inertial sensor and thruster • Length sensing and control vs orbit • Link acquisition • Force / acceleration noise requirement → Some part can be demonstrated with small-scale mission 11

  12. Recap of F-DECIGO Concept • Minimum success: Formation flight demonstration • Full success: End-to-end demonstration of the sensitivity Force noise evaluation • Extra success: Multi-wavelength GW observation Intermediate mass BH search • Use already-demonstrated parameters 12

  13. F-DECIGO Designed Sensitivity • 60 km, 2 kg, finesse 10, 10 mW, 4e-15 N/rtHz TianQin LISA B-DECIGO 13

  14. F-DECIGO Horizon Distance B-DECIGO LISA ET TianQin CE z=10 aLIGO z=1 F-DECIGO IMBH search KAGRA upto z~1 GW150914 O1 and O2 GW170817 binaries plotted 14 Optimal direction and polarization SNR threshold 8

  15. F-DECIGO Science Cases • First real IMBH search 48 event/year (SNR>8, optimistic) H. Shinkai+, ApJ 835, 276 (2017) • Estimate merger time and location of BNS For 1.4 Msun-1.4 Msun @ 40 Mpc, ~100 sec and 10 3 deg 2 precision is possible But SNR is around 2 H. Takeda+, PRD 98, 022008 (2018) week day hour ISCO week day hour ISCO Observation from a month before the merger Median over the angles 15 week day hour ISCO

  16. Dark Matter Search also Possible • Axion search with polarization measurement K. Nagano, T. Fujita, YM, I. Obata, PRL 123, 111301 (2019) • Vector DM which couples to B-L charge A. Pierce+, PRL 121, 061102 (2018) • Sensitivity not very good F-DECIGO CAST SN1987A aLIGO F-DECIGO DECIGO Cosmic Explorer Equivalence aLIGO principle tests LISA DECIGO 16

  17. Technical Feasibility • 4e-15 N/ √ Hz force noise (Residual gas of 1e-6 Pa) Demonstrated by LISA Pathfinder DECIGO requirement is PRL 120, 061101 (2018) 1e-16 N/ √ Hz • 2 kg mirror and housing, vacuum tank Similar to LISA Pathfinder • 60 km arm length GFO proof mass is 72 g GRACE-FO demonstrated 200 km Link acquisition is also demonstrated PRL 123, 031101 (2019) 17

  18. History of Iterations • April 2019 : C-DECIGO (10 km, 10 kg) proposal at Ando Group Midterm Seminar (slide) • May 2019 : C-DECIGO (10 km, 10 kg) proposal at FF meetup (slide) -> downgraded to F-DECIGO (10 km, 2 kg) to reduce mass • Sep 2019 : Refined F-DECIGO plan (60 km, 2 kg) assuming LPF-level force noise and focusing on applying to 公募型小 型 at JPS meeting (slide) • Nov 2019 : 60 km, 2 kg plan presented at DECIGO workshop (slide), Letter of Intent to 公募型小型 -> 100 m and 100 g plan (Let’s call it FF-DECIGO) was proposed from the limitation of Epsilon rocket and actuation dynamic range 18

  19. Why 100 m and 100 g • 180 kg / satellite @ 800 km altitude would be realistic to launch with Epsilon (previously we are thinking of 350 kg / satellite @ 1800 km) • 25 kg package with 72 g proof mass was used for GRACE-FO and probably similar for small-scale mission • Relative acceleration from J2 term being too much in geocentric orbit Earth gravity constant J2 coefficient Arm length Earth radius Orbital altitude 19

  20. Relative Force from J2 Term • Relative force from J2 is constant if m*L=const. • m*L = 100 g * 100 m gives 4e-8 N from J2 • Force noise requirement 4e-15 N/rtHz • Dynamic range 10 7 should be within our reach (~10 9 with good analog circuits) 60 km * 2 kg detector at 1800 km → 2e-4 N from J2 1800 km 100 m * 100 g detector at 800 km 800 km → 4e-8 N from J2 6400 km Calculation done with T. Ito’s code 20

  21. J2 Term and Sensitivity • If orbital altitude and dynamic range is given, achievable strain sensitivity can be calculated dynamic range with altitude 800 km and dynamic range 10 7 • You cannot win by increasing m or L !!! 21

  22. FF-DECIGO Concept • Focus on the demonstration of formation flying and the demonstration of the end-to-end demonstration as a gravitational wave detector • By (kind of) giving up GW detection 22

  23. FF-DECIGO Finesse • Finesse can be higher than F-DECIGO, upto radiation pressure noise being ~4e-15 N/rtHz F-DECIGO B-DECIGO Shot noise 5e-22/rtHz 1e-21/rtHz Assumed mirror g-factor = 0.3 diameter/thickness = 5 wavelength 515 nm FF-DECIGO 23

  24. FF-DECIGO Designed Sensitivity • 100 m, 100 g, finesse 1000, 10 mW, 4e-15 N/rtHz TOBA TianQin FF-DECIGO LISA B-DECIGO 24

  25. FF-DECIGO Horizon Distance B-DECIGO LISA ET CE TianQin z=10 F-DECIGO aLIGO z=1 KAGRA TOBA GW150914 FF-DECIGO GW170817 25

  26. FF-DECIGO Science Case • IMBH probably O(10 -8 ) event / year • Dark matter search worse than F-DECIGO • Upper limit to stochastic GW background FF-DECIGO 26 Data from Y. Kuwahara

  27. Comparison with Other Proposals • Worth a try if we can do faster than LISA, TianQin and 3G (and SOGRO etc.) TianQin FF-DECIGO LISA B-DECIGO 27

  28. Comparison with Prototypes • Improvement by many orders of magnitude Data from T. Shimoda Phase 1 Prototype TOBAs Cryo Phase 2 LISA Pathfinder 1.96 kg, 38 cm Phase 2.5 Phase 3 TOBA TorPeDO prototype 28

  29. Possibility of Longer Arms • Sensitivity and horizon distance scales linearly with arm length if intra-cavity power is constant and J2 term is somehow OK • Can be longer F-DECIGO B-DECIGO upto ~2 km from diffraction Shot noise loss 5e-22/rtHz 1e-21/rtHz FF-DECIGO 29

  30. Mode-Match Degradation • Assume mode-match is designed for 100 m and arm length is changed in orbit • Sensitivity scales almost linearly upto ~1 km with larger g-factor Only mode mismatch Including diffraction loss Compensation could be possible with adaptive optics and mode match tuning 30

  31. Summary • F-DECIGO (60 km, 2 kg) might not be possible but FF-DECIGO (100 m, 100 g) could be possible with Epsilon-class mission • Considering J2 term, if altitude and dynamic range is fixed, achievable strain sensitivity can be calculated and you cannot win by increasing the mirror mass or arm length • Almost no chance of FF-DECIGO detect gravitational waves, but still it can search for stochastic GW background with unpreceded sensitivity at ~1 Hz • Changing the arm length in orbit sounds feasible 31

Recommend


More recommend