gprs optimisation and network visualization
play

GPRS optimisation and Network visualization Janne Myllyl T-110.456 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

GPRS optimisation and Network visualization Janne Myllyl T-110.456 Topics What do we need to know? Different types of information available Basics of GPRS capacity optimisation Janne Myllyl T-110.456 Planning The network


  1. GPRS optimisation and Network visualization Janne Myllylä T-110.456

  2. Topics •What do we need to know? •Different types of information available •Basics of GPRS capacity optimisation Janne Myllylä T-110.456

  3. Planning •The network elements: •type specific information (e.g. family, radiation patterns) •current settings •Geographic information •Land use •Building height •Statistics •Models Janne Myllylä T-110.456

  4. Planning •Using the information we can estimate: •Network capacities in different areas •Overall service quality •Affect of changes in the network •Problems: •Models work in a perfect world •Map information is never up-to-date or accurate •Butterfly effect Janne Myllylä T-110.456

  5. Are there more accurate methods? •Network performance can also be measured •Field measurements •Network measurements Janne Myllylä T-110.456

  6. Optimisation basics Optimise Nokia NetAct Analyse Provision Measure Janne Myllylä T-110.456

  7. Measurement types •Call/Session •Radio Quality •Volume Janne Myllylä T-110.456

  8. Field measurements + •Basically a modified cellural phone is driven on a route. •Reliable information available without much traffic volume •Vendor independent • Can measure competitors network performance - •A lot of driving around needed. •Measurement sample time is very limited Janne Myllylä T-110.456

  9. Network measurements + •Almost all possible events are measured. •Measurements span over a longer timeperiod - •Not very standardized. Different vendors measure and collect slightly different data. •Moderate traffic volume is needed for reliable measurements. •The total amount of data is huge. Janne Myllylä T-110.456

  10. Busy Hour •The distribution of traffic is not even. During weekdays there occurs peaks in the network usage. •Radio networks don’t generally react well to traffic increase •According to common sence: Network behaviour during the busy hour is the weakest link. •Heuristics can be used to identify the bh. Janne Myllylä T-110.456

  11. What is visualized •Network static information •Locations & directions •Parameter values •Relations between elements Janne Myllylä T-110.456

  12. What is visualized • There are dozens of raw measurements (Performance Indicator) that are related to GPRS performance. •User wants to see the result of a preliminary analysis based on the raw measurements (Key Performance Indicator). Janne Myllylä T-110.456

  13. KPI •Traditional benchmarks ( BER, FER, CSR, HSR ) •(E) GPRS data related •Reliability, max probability of erroneous RLC •Throughput, amount of RLC payload •Delay, measured time between SGSN and mobile •(E)GPRS load, timeslots utilized by GPRS service •And many more Janne Myllylä T-110.456

  14. Visualizing KPI •Snaphot of network state: •Performance of network on map •List of elements not behaving within thresholds •Trend of measurements •Time based comparison between different elements / measurements •Performance animations on map Janne Myllylä T-110.456

  15. Network capacity balancing •In GSM network the available capacity is defined by timeslots dedicated for different services. •It is possible to dimension timeslot usage between •SDCCH •CS •PS Janne Myllylä T-110.456

  16. Visualization of timeslot usage Janne Myllylä T-110.456

  17. Visualizing service performance Janne Myllylä T-110.456

  18. Visualizing cell level performance Janne Myllylä T-110.456

  19. Effect of timeslot redimensioning 6 % The relevant analysis of CS 5 service performance need to 4 PS be continuous, since without 3 increase of total capacity SDDCH 2 timeslot dimensioning is always compromise. 1 0 3.1 10.1 17.1 24.1 Janne Myllylä T-110.456

  20. Treatment classes •Assigning GPRS capacity for different service classes •PoC •Streaming •Corporate •MMS •Diverse DL/UL QoS requirements. Janne Myllylä T-110.456

  21. QoS Priorisation TREC 3 TREC 2 TREC 1 TREC 0 T-110.456 GPRS Capacity and QoS Capacity Balancing Janne Myllylä Speech Capacity offered for various services Priorisation SMS �

  22. Running out of capacity 7 Dimensioning can now 6 CS only be used to increase 5 CS performance. PS 4 SDDCH The only way to improve PS 3 performance is to increase 2 the total capacity. 1 0 3.1 10.1 17.1 24.1 Janne Myllylä T-110.456

  23. How to increase capacity •Some of the traffic volume could be redirected to other cells •A new serving cell can be setup •TRXs can be added for the current cell(s) to increase total amount of timeslots •Impact matrix Janne Myllylä T-110.456

  24. Impact matrix •Also known as Interference matrix •All cells whose signal has been measured in serving cells dominance area • Handover possibility •Used to determine which cells could cause interference with serving cell. Janne Myllylä T-110.456

  25. Interference basics •The frequencies have traditionally been planned using reuse patterns and propagation models •In order to increase the traffic capacity, the channel re-use becomes tighter •Too tight use of the same and adjacent channels causes a decline of C/I � BER and FER increase, worse coding schemes Janne Myllylä T-110.456

  26. Interference without hopping •When no hopping is used some timeslots will constantly have more problems than others. •After too much reuse performance deteriorates quickly Janne Myllylä T-110.456

  27. Too tight reuse on map T-110.456 Janne Myllylä

  28. Averaging behaviour •Frequency hopping may be used to average network behaviour •Main idea is to reduce continuous bad performance between mobile and bss. Janne Myllylä T-110.456

  29. Averaged behaviour on map T-110.456 Janne Myllylä

  30. Hopping mode: BB •In BB hopping TRX frequencies don’t change, but TRX serving the mobile phone does. •Total amount of frequencies in BB hopping is the same as the number of TRXs. •Also BCCH timeslots 1-7 are included in the hopping. Janne Myllylä T-110.456

  31. Hopping mode: RF •In RF hopping TRX serving the mobile phone doesn’t change, but TRX frequencies do. •In RF hopping an allocation list contains frequencies that are used. •BCCH TRX is not hopping. •N channels enables 64*N different hopping sequences. •MAIO offset has as many values as allocation list has channels •HSN can be selected from 64 different sequences. Janne Myllylä T-110.456

  32. Hopping mode comparison BB TRX-1 RF BB TRX-2 RF BB TRX-3 RF Mobile hops the same frequency pattern in both modes Janne Myllylä T-110.456

  33. Measured performance 3.5 3 DCR 2.5 2 BB RF 1.5 1 0.5 0 EFL 1 2 3 4 5 Basically RF hopping enables a more tight channel reuse Janne Myllylä T-110.456

  34. Extreme channel reuse •Two types of service areas inside cell: •Normal with regular reuse patterns (overlay) •Small with extreme reuse (underlay) •The same underlay frequencies are used even in neighboring cells. •Cell tries to make as much as possible of the traffic volume to use the underlay frequencies. Janne Myllylä T-110.456

  35. Extreme channel reuse •The same traffic volume can be managed with less frequencies. •With this example situation 3 underlay TRXs could free 6 frequencies. underlay Janne Myllylä T-110.456

  36. References 3GPP TS 25.215 V6.0.0 Physical layer – measurements 3GPP TS 23.107 V6.2.0 QoS concept and architecture Halonen, Romero, Melero: GSM, GPRS and EDGE performance Janne Myllylä T-110.456

Recommend


More recommend