Governor Harry W. Nice Memorial Bridge Improvement Project Project Background and Status Update Presentation to Charles County Commissioners and King George County Board of Supervisors July 8, 2008
Nice Bridge NEPA Process 2
Nice Bridge NEPA Process 3
Project Purpose Provide a Potomac River crossing that is compatible with the US 301 approaches. Improve safety at approaches and on Bridge. Provide for two-way travel across Potomac during: Wide-load crossings Incidents & Poor weather Maintenance/ Rehabilitation work Provide capacity across Potomac River for design year 2030 . 4
Alternates Retained for Detailed Study Fourteen Preliminary Alternates (including No-Build) were evaluated Seven (including No-Build) carried forward 5
Alternates Retained for Detailed Study Alternate 1: No-Build Alternate 2: New 2-Lane to South, Rehabilitate Existing Alternate 3: New 2-Lane to South, Replace Existing Alternate 4: New 2-lane to North, Rehabilitate Existing Alternate 5: New 2-Lane to North, Replace Existing Alternate 6: New 4-Lane to South, Take Existing Out of Service Alternate 7: New 4-Lane to North, Take Existing Out of Service 6
Public Involvement Activities Alternates Public Workshops May 31, 2007 in Newburg, Maryland June 7, 2007 in Dahlgren, Virginia September 4, 2007 presentation to King George County Board of Supervisors November 14, 2007 presentation to Naval Support Facility Dahlgren Focus Group Meeting: January 2008 Public Hearing: Fall/Winter 2008 7
Next Steps in Project Draft Environmental Document: Summer/Fall 2008 Public Hearing: Fall/Winter 2008 Identify Preferred Alternate/Prepare Final Environmental Document: Winter/Spring 2009 Record of Decision/Complete Planning: Summer 2009 8
Contact Information Glen Smith , Project Manager Maryland Transportation Authority 2310 Broening Highway Baltimore, MD 21224 Phone: 410-537-5665 Toll Free: 1-866-713-1596 E-Mail: nicebridgestudy@mdta.state.md.us Project Website: www.mdtransportationauthority.com, Capital Projects link 9
Alternates Retained for Detailed Study 10
Alternates Retained for Detailed Study 11
Alternates Retained for Detailed Study 12
Alternates Retained for Detailed Study 13
Alternates Retained for Detailed Study 14
Alternates Retained for Detailed Study 15
Alternates Retained for Detailed Study 16
Alternates Dropped from Further Study Dropped Alternates 8 – 14 Alternate 8: Off Existing Alignment, Rehabilitate Existing Alternate 9: Roadway Shift Alternate 10: Tunnel Alternate 11: Stacked Deck Alternate 12: Three-Lane with Moveable Barrier Alternate 13: Transportation System Management/Travel Demand Management Alternate 14: Transit 17
Recommend
More recommend