GE Transportation Leader in Clean Island Power Solutions June 2019 Confidential. Not to be copied, distributed, or reproduced without prior approval.
OVERVIEW We are GE Transportation. Powering the World. Confidential. Not to be copied, distributed, or reproduced without prior approval. July 5, 2019 2
OVERVIEW GET’s Stationary Solutions GE MDC engines and gensets available with • EPA Tier 4, IMO Tier III • GE MDC Engines Driving the lowest life cycle costs and greatest fuel efficiency to customers • GE MDC Engines Transferring powerful engine technology to the marine environment • Bringing new possibilities to the most challenging conditions and environments Confidential. Not to be copied, distributed, or reproduced without prior approval. July 5, 2019 3
OVERVIEW Stationary Solutions – Fast Facts Confidential. Not to be copied, distributed, or reproduced without prior approval. July 5, 2019 4
OVERVIEW GET’s Stationary Solutions Confidential. Not to be copied, distributed, or reproduced without prior approval. July 5, 2019 5
Best Solution GET’s Environmental Solution GET Commitment to Power Plant Owners Plant Builders • GEVO introduced 2005, based • • Meet EPA Tier 4 / European No space consuming “SCR, DEF on EPA Tier 4 locomotive Tier III tanks, and associated support engine • High Reliable Engines systems” (dosing cabinet, air lines, etc.) • GE invested $400M to • • Best in Class Fuel Efficiency Emission Compliant / Plant develop a EPA T4 / EU Tier III • Industry leading life cycle Repower with minimal impact Engine with No After costs on vessel design Treatment • • Up to 60,000 hours between Easy Start up lowers overhauls (no top end commissioning costs. overhaul) GET’s invested in a non-aftertreatment solution to lower emissions Confidential. Not to be copied, distributed, or reproduced without prior approval. July 5, 2019 6
Best Solution GET’s Investment in Emissions Core technology to achieve EPA Tier 4 / IMO Tier III emissions without SCR GE committed to Marine Solutions Competition focused on Oil & Gas and Locomotive EGR Oil & Gas Locomotive • • CAT 3512 US EPA Tier 4 EMD 1010 US EPA Tier 4 • • MTU 4000 US EPA Tier 4 CAT C175 EU IIIb Competitors are focused on leveraging EGR engines in O&G GE V250 T4 gensets and loco applications vs. Marine Solutions GE V250 T2 HP Common Rail Control System • 2200 bar system • On Engine – ECU • DW w/ Leak Alarm • On Engine – AMSC • Integrated harnessing 2 Stage Turbo • Radial LP turbo Increased PCP Capability • Radial HP turbo • PA assembly upgrade • Packaging optimization • Structural upgrade to V250 EGR • EGR cooling & on engine cooler packaging • Marine approved shielding 5 July 2019 GE Confidential 7
Best Solution Genset Design HS vs. MS GE MS T4 Engine Vs. HS with SCR Weight and Volume Impact Operating Cost Impact / hr Common Range of Operation 129 Cost of Diesel+ DEF Consumption / HS Solution 7% Vol m3 Weight 6% 3% 10% 12% Engine 2 7% 6% 118t 8% 7% 77 75t hr Engine 1 Fuel Only Fuel Only 23t 31 GE 8L250 Competitor Competitor 75% 100% 50% Engine Load% 1 2 Engine Weight GE Engine 1 Engine 2 Engine 3 Urea Weight Additional Equip. Weight Operating Cost Design Impact • GE has the lowest Fuel + DEF consumption • Additional Steel for Foundation • Fuel + DEF consumption is normally 90%-95% of total • Additional Piping lifecycle cost • Additional Electric Cabling • GE engines also have industry leading overhaul cycles • Additional Structure Tank without the need for mid life top end / SCR overhauls Confidential. Not to be copied, distributed, or reproduced without prior approval. July 5, 2019 8
Best Solution Maximized Up Time… “ Less Maintenance ” High speed engine with SCR requires a lot of additional maintenance High Speed Engine 2240 b bkW with SCR S System GE 8L250MDC 2 2250 b bkW Typical Schedule for T4 GE Engine 20,000 to 40,000 Hour Overhaul Depending on Duty Cycle Typical Schedule for HS Engine Typical Schedule for SCR: • • 5,000 Hours: Clean SCR Elements 7,500 Hours: Top End Overhaul • • 10,000 Hours: Replace SCR Elements 15,000 Hours: Top End Overhaul • • 15,000 Hours: Clean SCR Elements 22,500 Hours: Major Overhaul • • 20,000 Hours: Replace SCR Elements 30,000 Hours: Top End Overhaul • • 25,000 Hours: Clean SCR Elements 37,500 Hours: Top End Overhaul • • 30,000 Hours: Replace SCR Elements 45,000 Hours: Major Overhaul • 35,000 Hours: Clean SCR Elements • 40,000 Hours: Replace SCR Elements Field Testimonial… GE marine engines go past 40,000 hours without an overhaul Confidential. Not to be copied, distributed, or reproduced without prior approval. July 5, 2019 9
Best Solution GET’s Best System Summary EGR Design Fuel Consumption Fail Safe Design • EGR has Impact on the Fuel consumption Loss of Control • • EGR (control valve open and backflow valve Common Rail Fuel system closed) • Increased Cylinder Pressure • The engine can run full power Fuel consumption improved than T2 engine Non- default Valve position • Nominal EGR • None to limited performance impact Maintenance • No Changes on Engine Maintenance sch. • EGR Cleaning procedure is very simple These failure modes will not cause an automatic engine shutdown! Confidential. Not to be copied, distributed, or reproduced without prior approval. July 5, 2019 10
References GET’s Power Examples Confidential. Not to be copied, distributed, or reproduced without prior approval. July 5, 2019 11
References GET’s Power Examples Confidential. Not to be copied, distributed, or reproduced without prior approval. July 5, 2019 12
References GET’s Recent Case Study • Diesel Electric Power Plant (Example) • Fuel Efficient (Saving more than 12%) • Reduced 0verhauls and out of Service • Power Requirement ~12MWe • Tender was open to HIGH SPEED and Medium SPEED • Annual Savings ~ $1 Million • Replacing HIGH SPEED (Tier 0) Confidential. Not to be copied, distributed, or reproduced without prior approval. July 5, 2019 13
References GET’s Additional Case Review Based on MS Gensets Weight Space OPEX 906m3 $3.7M $3.7M 419t Vol m3 719m3 $3.62M 334t 618m3 $3.52M 288t $3.49 M 331m3 334m3 228t 276m3 206t 191t GE Engine 1 Engine 2 Engine 3 GE Engine Engine Engine Engine Engine Engine 3 X 12V250 12V250 1 2 3 1 2 3 2 x 6L250 GE Different Genset Mix GE Different Genset Mix Estimates Annual operating Cost Engine Weight Additional Equip. Weight Diesel Oil Maintenance Urea Weight Engine Vol Additional Equip. Vol DEF Urea Tank Vol • • • Majority of the weight coming from Urea Tank Urea Solution demand double Space at least GE solution save $100K at least without • Vessel Design should accommodate additional adding Urea Logistic / Management 97t at least o • Weight distribution / Management Based on Diesel = 0.60 US$/l, AdBlue = 0.70 US$/l Note: Consumption for Urea Tank Heating Not Included Confidential. Not to be copied, distributed, or reproduced without prior approval. July 5, 2019 14
Summary Summary of Advantages 2400 – Quantity of engines that can be built in one year 700,000 – GE Investment in R&D USD (IMO Tier 3 / EPA Tier 4) 440,000 – Square Foot of State of Art Manufacturing 72 – Average Cub/ Ft Space Savings with 8L250 T4 vs others 88.5 – Average Tons Savings with GET 8L250 T4 vs others 22,000 – Minimum Total of Installed base of engines 9.33 - Average Fuel and Urea Savings versus Competitors 150,000,000 - Total hours of in service operations 60,000 – Max recommended hrs between overhauls 50 – Total years of experience with Medium Speed 100,000 – Average USD Engine Savings per year per MW. 8,500 – Total Number of Electronic Engines in service 1500 – Approx. number Tier 4 type Engines in Operation. 16,150,000 Hours of Tier 4 Engine Platform experience Confidential. Not to be copied, distributed, or reproduced without prior approval. July 5, 2019 15
Patrick Webb, Director Americas Patrick.webb3@ge.com +1 251 222 0020
Recommend
More recommend
