8/23/2018 You spoke. We listened. Tell Us More! A Planning Commission – Metropolitan Planning Organization for Transportation Partnership in Coordination with the Transportation for Economic Development Initiative Imagine 2040 Transportation Part 2: How will we get there? F ina nc ia l Sc e na rio 1 (Ba se line ) - Existing r e ve nue s & spe nding patte r ns Most programs o funded at “Level 1” A handful of road Existing o Revenues projects on US New Hwys (FDOT Revenues Level 1 funding) and Funding Crash Reduct. possibly in Tampa Level 2 Funding (remaining CIT Level 3 funds) Funding KES Hwy Projects KES Transit Projects 1
8/23/2018 $18,000 Fixed Transit F ina nc ia l $16,000 Hwy Capacity Trails/ Sc e na r io 8a – Sidepaths TD Svcs. $14,000 New Sales Tax Bus 1 Ct. Sale s T ax $12,000 Services $10,000 Imp. Fees, Existing Prop. Share Can increase Revenues Vuln. Reduct. o Existing CIT Local Govt. $8,000 New most programs Crash Gas Tax Revenues Reduct. to “Level 3” Level 1 $6,000 Funding Transit and afford some Cong. Mgt. Revenues Level 2 highway capacity Funding $4,000 Bus Maint. Metro. Grants and fixed transit Bridges Level 3 Funding State Maint. & projects $2,000 Non‐SIS Hwys KES Hwy Pavement Projects KES Transit $‐ Projects Expenditures Revenues Citize n initia tive ove rvie w • “Funding for Countywide Distribution of Proc e e ds Transportation and Road Improvements by County Charter Amendment” One‐cent sales tax, 30 years, deposited in audited trust fund • Independent Oversight Committee (IOC) Incl. 2‐3 volunteer members appointed by Tampa Mayor • MPO Role Assist the IOC, County/Cities and HART with planning, data collection & analysis, grants 2
8/23/2018 Citize n initia tive ove rvie w • County/Cities’ shares are distributed based on County/ Citie s’ Portion population Tampa ~ 27% pop., ~15% of annual proceeds • New roads & addl. lanes on existing roads (except for intersection improvements) are eligible under Any/Other and Bike/Ped • Not eligible: • Interstate hwy expansion • Sports facility construction • Any non‐transportation‐ related facility Citize n initia tive ove rvie w HART Portion • Project Plan by each agency, due annually on Sept. 30, approved by: governing body of each agency IOC at a public hearing 3
8/23/2018 Pre se rve the Syste m – Roa d Re surfa c ing Resurface *before* pavement failure! Repave How Often? Current funding allows for roads to be repaved every 50 years, on average countywide. Preferred goals are: Pre se rve the Syste m – Br idg e s Bridge Name Total Caruthers Road over Turkey Creek $976,000 E. Keysville Road over Alafia River West $1,450,313 Branch CR 672 over Hurrah Creek $2,910,325 Grange Hall Loop over Little Manatee River $5,231,250 CR 579 over Little Manatee River $3,275,938 CR 579 over Little Manatee River South Fork $3,339,036 CR 587 (West Shore Boulevard) $1,386,189 Old Mulberry Road $2,955,423 70 th Street S $1,709,736 Balm Riverview Road $1,832,685 Old Big Bend Road $5,066,102 CR 39 (230’ North of CR 672) $4,616,090 W. Waters Avenue $2,077,620 Sligh Avenue $8,581,706 CR 582 (Tarpon Springs Road) $1,633,830 Bridges last around 50 years. N. Pebble Beach Boulevard $1,661,270 Fletcher Avenue $14,406,596 Current spending on bridge Morris Bridge Road $1,528,145 Morris Bridge Road $2,440,457 maintenance is ~ $31 Million annually, Columbus Drive $3,344,625 CR 39 (1.4 mi S of CR 640) $2,357,228 or $620 million over 20 years. * CR 39 (2.2 mi S of CR 640) $2,485,479 78 th Street $2,380,325 Morris Bridge Road $6,615,000 Another $100 million is needed 4 th Street SW $5,433,026 Brorein Street Bridge $2,000,000 for the listed bridges. Columbus Drive over Hillsborough River $2,000,000 Cass Street Bridge $2,000,000 Laurel Street $2,000,000 *Capital improvement programs of Hillsborough County, Platt Street $2,000,000 the three cities, and FDOT District 7. Total $99,694,389 4
8/23/2018 Pre se rve the Syste m – Buse s Federal Transit Authority (FTA) standard: replace buses at least every 12 years. 5 fewer breakdowns every week! Re duc e Cra she s & Vulne ra bility – Cra sh Re duc tion Highest traffic fatality rate of all large U.S. counties, 2016! 450 miles of Complete Streets (~50% above Phoenix & 20% ‐ 50% fewer crashes! or Dallas, per capita!) $25 million/ year $68 million/ year 5
8/23/2018 Re duc e Cr a she s – Comple te Stre e ts Pote ntia l Proje c ts • Illustrative, non‐binding list in 2040 Transportation Plan • Policy focus is on high‐crash areas; data‐driven approach • Tampa already actively working on many • MPO supports by making them a priority for federal grants o Tampa St/Florida Ave o Westshore Blvd o Cass/Tyler/Nuccio Spine o Columbus/17 th /18 th /19 th o Many more Pedbikeimages.org / Dan Burden Re duc e Cra she s & Vulne ra bility – Vulne ra bility Re duc tion (Stormwa te r) Category 3 Economic losses cut in half Storm Surge 6
8/23/2018 Ma na g e T ra ffic for Drive rs & Shippe rs The Tampa Bay Region is the 12 th most congested metropolitan area in the nation and second Travel Time ~20% More Reliable most in Florida after Miami. The region had the 19 th longest delay in the nation with over Travel Time Reliability: 53,000 hours spent each year How much longer would it take you stuck in traffic. at rush hour? 7 Largest Counties in FL 3 Hillsborough ‐ 2.5x Arterials 2.5 2x Hillsborough ‐ Freeways 2 1.5x 1.5 1 0.5 0 2010 2010 2013 2013 Level 1 Level 1 Level 3 Level 3 Ma na g e T ra ffic for Drive rs & Shippe rs: F re ig ht FHWA forecasts that 496 million tons of freight will move through Tampa Bay in 2040 compared to 295 million tons in 2011, a 68% increase. Most of that freight will be moved by truck. 10 hours/day traffic stoppage: gone! 7
8/23/2018 Re a l Choic e s Whe n Not Driving – T ra nsit L e ve l of Se rvic e Re a l Choic e s Whe n Not Driving – T ra nsit L e ve l of Se rvic e P EOPLE & J OBS S ERVED P EOPLE & J OBS S ERVED One in 6 Almost half Frequent Service Two in 5 Almost 2/3 Somewhat Frequent Level 1 Level 3 8
8/23/2018 Re a l Choic e s Whe n Not Driving – T ra nsporta tion Disa dva nta g e d Door‐to‐door service for the most needy: much more costly if we don’t invest in our bus system. About a third of our population has the potential to be Transportation Disadvantaged, and the number is growing faster than countywide growth, as Boomers age. Re a l Choic e s Whe n Not Driving – T ra ils & Side pa ths 240 New Miles County Greenways 10% or fewer feel safe & Master Plan comfortable cycling on the paved shoulders of roads. Tampa Greenways & Trails Plan Temple Terrace Trails Community Plans 9
8/23/2018 Hig hwa y Ca pa c ity: Priority Proje c ts for Ke y E c onomic Spa c e s (sho wing tho usands o f jo bs in 2040) Occident St & Trask St Extensions, Westshore District (61‐80 K jobs) Bearss Ave and Fletcher Ave, USF Area (54‐71 K jobs) Anderson Rd and Linebaugh Ave, Airport North (52‐65 K jobs) Woodberry Rd and Bloomingdale Ave, Brandon West (44‐108 K jobs) Falkenburg Rd and US 92 , Sabal Park Area (33‐55 K jobs) Hillsborough Ave and Davis Rd Ext, Netpark/Breckenridge (26‐40 K jobs) Broadway Ave , CSX Intermodal area (25‐33 K jobs) US 41/Rail/Causeway Interchange , Port Tampa Bay Area (21‐25 K jobs) Sam Allen Rd Ext. and US 92, Plant City East (17‐32 K jobs) New Tampa Blvd Widen & Ext., 50% toll‐funded, New Tampa (7‐9 K jobs) F ixe d Guide wa y T ra nsit Proje c ts Connect Downtown to USF and Westshore/Airport Greater Downtown Key Economic Space: 80‐112 K jobs; Westshore District: 61‐80 K jobs; USF Area: 54‐71 K jobs • Possibilities: rubber‐tire, steel‐wheel • What’s important is not getting stuck in traffic • Keep costs down by using existing right‐of‐way: streetcar, CSX tracks, interstate shoulders, repurposed lanes on roads with room Water Transit Pilot Project MacDill AFB Key Economic Space: 8‐9 K jobs 10
8/23/2018 Traffic Congestion USF with 2040 Growth, if no Westshore improve‐ Downtown ments after Brandon 2018 MacDill Vehicles per Day: Demand > capacity: Spending Level Preferences, On‐line Includes spending on both programs & projects over 20 years $7‐9 B 82% of respondents exceeded $5‐7 B the current budget > $9 B < $5 B Your plan exceeds current budget. Click for info on revenue options. 11
8/23/2018 Even in 2010 Post-Referendum Polling Transportation remains a top concern • 72% say traffic & transportation are a high priority for local officials to address • Only 11% of “no” voters said they voted no because “it’s not needed/ transit not necessary” • Only 18% said “take no additional steps” [i.e., 82% are open to revisiting the topic] 23 T ha nk You! E nc o urage Othe rs to We igh I n itstime ta mpa ba y.org 2 4 12
Recommend
More recommend