Funnel Gas Model for Protein Many-Body Systems under the Crowded Environment Macoto Kikuchi 1 , Yoshikatsu Tada 1 , Nobu C. Shirai 2 1.Cybermedia Center, Osaka Univ. 2.Center for Information Technologies and Networks, Mie Univ.
Goal of the talk Introduce a simple lattice-gas type model to 1 describe the system consisting of proteins and crowding molecules. Apply the effective free-energy of the model to 2 discuss the crowding effect on the folding of small globular proteins
Part 1 Construction of the Funnel Gas Model
Motivation Background Foldable proteins have funnel-like energy landscape Energy landscape theory or funnel picture ( e.g. Wolyness) Interior of the living cells is crowded by biological molecules Molecular crowding effect ( e.g. Minton)
Purpose To simulate the protein many-body system with crowding molecules, we need an appropriately coarse-grained model. We develop a Lattice-gas based model A prototype model has already been introduced in Shirai and Kikuchi, J.Chem.Phys. 144 (2016) 055101.
Setup Proteins A protein has internal states, for which the funnel-like free-energy landscape is taken into account: FUNNEL GAS! The native state occupies a single site A few denatured states that occupy one or more sites (expanded) Crowding molecules A crowding molecule occupy a single site Interact only through on-site excluded volume effect (no other interactions considered)
Denatured Native Denatured Crowder Concept of Funnel Gas Model
A Little bit of theory Protein f i : Free energy of i -th state v i : Volume (number of the occupation sites) of i -th state n i : Number of proteins at i -th state ∑ i n i = N : Total number of proteins Protein-protein interactions can also be taken into account.
System Fixed number of proteins + Grand-canonical ensemble of crowders Partition Function [ M ] ( M ) ∑ e βµ m e − ∑ i β f i n i Ξ = Tr m m =0 β : Inverse temperature µ : Chemical potential of the crowders M : Number of the free sites on which the crowders can be placed
Using the binomial theorem, Ξ is rewritten as [ ] Ξ = e α V Tr e − ∑ i ( β f i + α v i ) n i , where α = log(1 + e βµ ) The crowders are traced out.
Effective Free Energy for a Protein β f eff = β f i + α v i i Volume dependent modification also depends on the density of crowders through α Effective Partition Function Z eff = Tr [ ] i f eff e − β ∑ n i i Equivalent to the canonical ensemble consisting only of proteins with the effective free-energy f eff i
We can simulate the protein many-body systems under the crowding environment without explicitly considering the crowding molecules. Computational effort is largely reduced.
Limitation of the model Crowding molecules should not be too small The depletion force (Asakura and Osawa) is not taken into account. Crowding molecules should not be too large The volume of denatured states does no effect The model is suitable for the case that the size of the crowding molecules are comparable to that of the native state of the protein
Part 2 Molecular Crowding Effects on Protein Folding
Motivation Effective free-energy derived for the funnel gas model β f eff = β f i + α v i i By identifying v i as the volume of i -th conformation, we can use f eff to obtain an approximate free-energy i landscape of the protein for any model
Application Study the effect of molecular crowding on the folding of small globular proteins using f eff i . Model Go model on SC lattice for protein This lattice is different from the one used in the funnel gas model To calculate f eff , the protein is considered as a i sphere of the radius R g (radius of gyration). Crowders are treated by the funnel gas model of closed-packed lattice. Size of the crowders is taken as the same as that of the native state of the protein
Native conformations of toy proteins Up-Down β Burrel Four-Helix Bundle
Free-energy landscapes for proteins without crowders are obtained using the Multi-Self-Overlap-Ensemble Monte Carlo method Chikenji, Kikuchi and Iba, PRL 83 (1999) 1886.
Result: Up-Down β burrel
α = 0.0 33.94 7 35.94 6 37.94 5 R g 39.94 4 41.94 3 43.94 2 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 E Free energy landscape at T f (no crowder)
α = 0.32 21.66 7 34.94 6 36.94 5 38.94 R g 4 40.94 3 42.94 2 44.94 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 E crowder volume fraction φ ≃ 0 . 2
α = 0.78 2.02 7 34.94 6 36.94 5 38.94 R g 4 40.94 3 42.94 2 44.94 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 E crowder volume fraction φ ≃ 0 . 4
39 α = 0.0 α = 0.32 40 α = 0.78 41 42 f 43 44 45 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 E Energy vs. Free Energy at T f
Result: Four-Helix Bundle
α = 0.0 86.15 89.15 10 92.15 8 95.15 R g 98.15 6 101.15 4 104.15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 6 4 2 1 E Free energy landscape at T f (no crowder)
α = 0.32 41.83 88.15 10 91.15 8 94.15 R g 97.15 6 100.15 4 103.15 106.15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 6 4 2 1 E crowder volume fraction φ ≃ 0 . 2
α = 0.78 22.0 88.1 10 91.1 8 94.1 R g 97.1 6 100.1 4 103.1 106.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 6 4 2 1 E crowder volume fraction φ ≃ 0 . 4
85 α = 0.0 α = 0.32 90 α = 0.78 95 f 100 105 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 8 6 4 2 1 1 E Energy vs. Free Energy at T f
The native state is stabilized by the crowding effect. ← Expanded conformations of the denatured state becomes unstable Although this effect has long been expected intuitively or from some simulation results ( e.g. Cheung et al. (2005)), the present formulation clearly explains the origin of the effect.
Summary We formulated the funnel gas model for simulating protein many-body systems under the crowded environment. The effect of the crowder is absorbed in the effective free energy of the protein as long as only the excluded volume interaction is taken into account. We applied the effective free energy to folding of small globular proteins and showed that the native states are stabilized by destabilization of the expanded denatured state due to the molecular crowding effect.
Recommend
More recommend