FULL-CYCLE PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING Peter N. Smith, P.E. Director, Transportation Planning and Programming TxDOT - Performance-Based Planning & Programming
Outline 1 Federal and State Requirements 2 Vision: Full-Cycle Performance-Based Planning and Programming 3 Performance-Based System Needs Prioritization 4 Performance-Based Corridor Project Needs Prioritization 5 Performance-Based Investment Scenarios 6 Performance-Based Project Selection 7 Monitoring and Tracking TxDOT - Performance-Based Planning & Programming 2
1. Federal and State Requirements MA MAP P – 21 (Moving g Ahea ead f d for Progr gres ess in the 2 e 21st c century) ) – Requires states and MPOs to collectively set per performance targets in TIPs and STIP (passed in 2012) FA FAST Act (Fix ixin ing America’ a’s Surface Transportatio ion Act ) – Continues these federal requirements (passed in 2015) House B Ho Bill 2 20 (passed in 2015) – Requires TxDOT and MPOs to develop and implement performance metrics and measures for the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), Rural Transportation Plans (RTP), and the Unified Transportation Program (UTP) Sen Senate Bil ill l 312 - Tx TxDO DOT Sunset B Bill (passed in 2017) – Plans and policy efforts are to contain system strategies, goals and measurable targets, and related performance measures – Analyze the effect of funding allocation and project selection decisions on accomplishing goals in the statewide Long-range Transportation Program (LRTP) – For projects in UTP, evaluate projects based on strategic need and potential contribution toward achieving goals prior to considering other criteria such as funding availability and project readiness TxDOT - Performance-Based Planning & Programming 3
2. Vision: Full-Cycle Performance-Based Planning & Programming TxDOT will use performance- based planning and programming to help inform decision-making for the life- cycle of programs: statewide funding category investments, system-wide corridor priorities, and project-portfolio priorities. TxDOT - Performance-Based Planning & Programming 4
Transportation Planning: Plans, Programs, & Evaluation Tools Unified d Transpor ortation on 2-Yea ear Texas T Transpor ortation on Corridor or P Planning Transpor ortation on Improveme ement nt Letting Plan Pl Program Program Schedule le Yrs 2 Yr uct ity nstruc Authorit 2 Cons Au Yrs 10 Yr 10 Yrs Develop p ity <24 Yr Authorit Yr s <24 24+ Yr 24+ Au Authority Fed Plan A 1. Investment Project Corridor Corridor Planning Performance Scenarios Performance Evaluation Prioritization phase Dashboards 2. Portfolio - Decision Tool (CET) Tool (CPT) tools performance - Lens Decision Lens TxDOT - Performance-Based Planning & Programming 5
3. Performance-Based System Needs Prioritization TxDOT - Performance-Based Planning & Programming 6
Performance Measures Corridor S Score Preserva vation – Preserva vation – Economic Safe afety Co Congestion Connectivity Pavement Br Bridge Develop opment % Count Stations Density of Existing Pavement Bridge Sufficiency Existing Population K&A Crash Rate with Existing V/C > Major Traffic Condition Score Rating Density 0.80 Generators % Count Stations % of Corridor that % Pavement with % Bridge Deck with Existing Total Crash Rate with Future V/C > is Hurricane Condition Score < Sufficiency Rating Employment 0.80 Evacuation Route 60 < 60 Density % of Corridor in % of Corridor that Projected Traffic Top 100 is National Freight Growth Rate Congestion for All Network Vehicles % of Corridor that % Privately Held % of Corridor in is Energy Sector Land Top 100 Route Congestion for Trucks Daily Truck Volume Commodity Flow TxDOT - Performance-Based Planning & Programming 7
Process Automation Raw In Input Sco core TxDOT OT Dat ata Criteria Performance Measure Score Criteria Performance Measure Raw Value Pavement Pavement 1 Pavement Condition Score 5.1 1 Pavement Condition Score 89.8 2 % Pavement with Pavement Condition Score < 60 5.7 2 % Pavement with Pavement Condition Score < 60 5.7% Bridge Bridge 3 Bridge Sufficiency Score 1.0 3 Bridge Sufficiency Score 92.8 4 % Deck Area on Bridges with Suff Rating < 60 0.0 4 % Deck Area on Bridges with Suff Rating < 60 0.0% Pavement Safety Safety 5 K&A crash rate for entire corridor 3.9 5 K&A crash rate for entire corridor 3.5 6 Total crash rate for entire corridor 1.3 6 Total crash rate for entire corridor 55.3 Brid idge Congestion Congestion 7 % Count Stations with Existing V/C > 0.80 0.0 7 % Count Stations with Existing V/C > 0.80 0.0% 8 % Count Stations with Future V/C > 0.80 2.3 8 % Count Stations with Future V/C > 0.80 18.5% 9 Texas Transp Institute hot spot list for all 0.0 9 Texas Transp Institute hot spot list for all 0.0% 10 Texas Transp Institute hot spot list for trucks 0.0 10 Texas Transp Institute hot spot list for trucks 0.0% Safe fety Economic Development Economic Development 11 Daily Freight Volumes 4.8 11 Daily Freight Volumes 9,300 12 Commodity Flow 4.3 12 Commodity Flow 142M Congestion 13 Existing employment 5.2 13 Existing employment 157 14 Existing population 5.6 14 Existing population 349 15 Projected annual traffic growth rate 6.3 15 Projected annual traffic growth rate 3.8% 16 % of Privately held land 9.2 16 % of Privately held land 99.2% Economi mic D Devel elopmen pment Connectivity Connectivity Provides access to existing multi-modal facilities Provides access to existing multi-modal facilities 17 2.5 17 0.44 or major traffic generators or major traffic generators 18 Part of hurricane evacuation route 10.0 18 Part of hurricane evacuation route 100% Connectivity Part of National Freight Network or TxDOT Part of National Freight Network or TxDOT 19 10.0 19 100% Primary Freight Network Primary Freight Network 20 Part of Energy Sector Route 9.6 20 Part of Energy Sector Route 99.4% Dat ata E Extrac action T Tool Corrido idor P Priorit itiz izat atio ion T Tool ( (CPT) TxDOT - Performance-Based Planning & Programming 8 8
Corrido idor P Prio iorit itiz izat atio ion T Tool TxDOT - Performance-Based Planning & Programming 9
Sam Sample Co Corrido dor Pr Prioritization R Resu sults TxDOT - Performance-Based Planning & Programming 10
Sam Sample Co Corrido dor Pr Prioritization R Resu sults TxDOT - Performance-Based Planning & Programming 11
4. P Perform rman ance ce-Based ed C Cor orridor idor P Proj oject N Needs eeds Priorit itiz ization ion TxDOT - Performance-Based Planning & Programming 12
Corridor Evaluation Tool: Measures and Data Sources Category Performance Measure Data Source Pavement Index Pavement Directional Main lane Distress Score Directional Main lane Ride Score PMIS/TxDOT OpenData portal; latest available data Frontage Road Pavement Condition Score Pavement Failure Bridge Index Bridge Sufficiency Bridge Functionally Obsolete Bridges BRINSAP/TxDOT OpenData portal; latest available data Bridge Rating Culvert Rating Safety Index Safety Directional Main Lane Crash Rate CRIS; 5 years of data Frontage Road Crash Rate Safety Hot Spots Mobility Index Future Daily V/C Volume data from RHINO; Years 2017 and 2038 Capacity calculated using generalized Peak Hour V/C equations based on facility type and data from RHINO (# of lanes, % trucks, etc.) Mobility Frontage Road Existing V/C Frontage Road Future V/C Directional Travel Time Index INRIX; average over 1 year of data Directional Planning Time Index INRIX; average over 1 year of data Interchange Existing V/C Volume data from RHINO; Years 2017 and 2038 Capacity calculated using generalized equations based on facility type and data from RHINO (# of lanes, % trucks, etc.) Interchange Future V/C Freight Index INRIX; average over 1 year of data Truck Directional Travel Time Index INRIX; average over 1 year of data Freight Truck Directional Planning Time Index INRIX; average over 1 year of data Bridge Vertical Clearance BRINSAP/TxDOT OpenData portal; latest available data Bridge Load Ratings BRINSAP/TxDOT OpenData portal; latest available data TxDOT - Performance-Based Planning & Programming 13
Sample Corridor Evaluation Tool Results TxDOT - Performance-Based Planning & Programming 14
5. Performance-Based Investment Scenarios Planning Financial Forecast Scenario Distribution by State Funding Category Repeat for multiple scenarios Estimated $ Contribution to Key Performance Measure (KPM) KPM Inter-relationship factors $ Value calculations by category for KPM Estimated Effect on Performance Track and Monitor TxDOT - Performance-Based Planning & Programming 15
Recommend
More recommend
