Fiscal Year 2009 Fiscal Year 2009 President’s Budget Request for President’s Budget Request for DoD Science & Technology DoD Science & Technology Mr. Bob Baker Deputy Director, Plans and Programs Office of the Director, Defense Research and Engineering 1
The Bottom Line PBR09 is a continuation of the transition of S&T investment to enable growth of “non- kinetic”, non-platform specific capabilities Shifting away from an emphasis on ships, tanks, and planes — to focus on protection, information, knowledge, and timely, actionable intelligence 2
DDR&E Vision Develop Develop technology to technology to defeat any defeat any adversary on adversary on any battlefield. any battlefield. 3
DDR&E Priorities for CY 2008 • Support Global War on Terrorism • Support Urban Operations Capabilities • Support WMD Detection & Response Capabilities • Develop Transformational Power & Energy Technologies • Develop Manufacturing Technologies • Enhance Technology Transition • Enhance National Security S&E Workforce • Increase funding for Basic Research, plus $270M 4
White House Guidance • President Bush acknowledged the importance of science and engineering development in his January 2008 State of the Union address “To keep America competitive into the future, we must trust in the skill of our scientists and engineers and empower them to pursue the breakthroughs of tomorrow… I ask Congress to double federal support for critical basic research in the physical sciences and ensure America remains the most dynamic nation on Earth..” President George W. Bush, State of the Union address, January 28, 2008 5
Overview • PBR 2009 S&T Budget • Budget Changes and Historical Context • Strategic foundation and Investment Focus • Reliance 21 and the R&E Portal 6
7 PBR 2009 S&T Budget
FY08 and FY09 RDT&E Budget Request Comparison - in Then Year Dollars - FY08 RDT&E request = $75.12B FY09 RDT&E request = $79.43B (Budget Activities 1-7) (Budget Activities 1-7) 80 80 ($B) ($B) 75 75 70 70 BA6 BA7 Operational Systems BA7 Operational Systems BA6 + BA7 65 65 Development ($26.46B) Development ($28.46B) + BA7 = $32.64B = $30.58B 60 60 55 55 BA6 RDT&E Management BA6 RDT&E Management 50 50 Support ($4.13B) Support ($4.18B) 45 45 40 40 BA5 System Development & BA5 System Development & Demonstration ($18.10B) Demonstration ($19.54B) 35 35 BA4 BA4 + BA5 + BA5 30 30 = $35.31B = $33.76B 25 25 BA4 Advanced Component BA4 Advanced Component 20 Development & Prototypes 20 Development & Prototypes ($15.66B) ($15.77B) 15 15 S&T: S&T: 10 10 BA3 Advanced Technology BA3 Advanced Technology BA1 BA1 Development ($4.98B) Development ($5.53B) 5 BA2 5 BA2 BA2 Applied Research ($4.24B) BA2 Applied Research ($4.36B) + BA3 + BA3 BA1 Basic Research ($1.70B) 0 BA1 Basic Research ($1.43B) 0 = $10.77B = $11.48B Technology Base (BA1 +BA2) = $5.78B Technology Base (BA1 + BA2) = $5.94B PBR08 S&T is 14.3% of RDT&E PBR09 S&T is 14.5% of RDT&E 8
FY09 DoD R&E Budget Request Comparison Real Change FY09 PBR from PBR (Constant Year FY08 PBR FY08 Approp FY08) (In CY $) Basic Research (BA 1) 1,428 1,634** 1,699 ( 1,662) +16.4% Applied Research (BA 2) 4,357 5,092 4,245 (4,153) -4.7% Advanced Technology Development (BA 3) 4,987 6,043 5,532 (5,412) +8.5% 11,475 DoD S&T 10,772 12,768 (11,227) +4.2% Advanced Component Development 15,774 and Prototypes (BA 4) 15,662 15,947 ( 15,431) -1.5% 27,249 DoD R&E (BAs 1 – 4) 26,434 28,716 (26,657) +0.9% 515,400 DoD Topline 481,554 569,000 +4.3% (502,486) 9
FY09 DoD S&T Budget Request Total FY09 S&T request = $11.48B Total FY08 S&T Request = 10.77B Army = 1,728 Navy = 1,667 AF = 1,964 DARPA = 3,033 ChemBio = 610 DTRA = 401 OSD = 1,166 Other DA = 201 3,500 (3,155) 3,000 2,500 1,625 (2,075) (Millions) (1,842) (1,840) 2,000 578 (1,281) 679 739 1,500 1,044 1,000 1,334 633 (595) 724 1,140 (440) (248) 500 338 69 211 26 528 452 18 379 204 208 14 211 72 196 53 0 Army Navy/USMC AF DARPA Chem Bio DTRA OSD Other DA 10 Basic Research Applied Research Advanced Technology Development
Recipients of DoD S&T Funds DoD S&T Funding Recipients by Percentage 60% 50% 40% (PBR08) 30% 20% 10% 0% 6.1 Basic Research 6.2 Applied Research 6.3 Advanced Development Universities In-House Labs Industry Others* *Includes non-profit institutions, State & local govt., & foreign institutions Source: National Science Foundation Report (PBR08) 11
12 Budget Changes and Historical Context
PBR09 S&T Request Addresses Capability Gaps • PBR09 S&T Request continues the realignment initiated in FY08 to address capability gaps identified in the 2006 QDR – Special (“non-kinetic”/enabling) technologies: − Clandestine Tagging, Tracking and Locating − Biometrics $183M − Human, Cultural, Social Behavior Modeling − Networks $611M − Persistent Surveillance – Technologies to decrease energy consumption and increase alternative sources of energy ($513M) – Active and conventional armor technology for protection against a range of threats ($68M) – Accelerating technology transition to fielded systems Investment is shifting away from platform-specific technologies 13
PBR09 S&T Request Addresses Capability Gaps (Cont’d) • New technology/emphasis areas – $270M increase to Basic Research − Enhance the science and engineering personnel base − Emphasis will be on research to address Grand Capability Challenges, e.g., – Cyber protection and information assurance – Network sciences – Science of autonomy – Information fusion and decision sciences – Biosensors and biometrics – Human sciences (cultural, cognitive, behavioral, neural) – Software sciences and materials – Immersive sciences for training and mission rehearsal – Power and energy management – Counter directed energy weapons − Anticipate about 500 focused research efforts 14
PBR09 S&T Request Addresses Capability Gaps (Cont’d) • New technology/emphasis areas (Cont’d) – Increased protection for dismounted troops and ground forces ($60M) – Research in plasma and meta-materials to address emerging threats ($35M) – Cyber protection **($50M) – Hypersonics/Prompt Global Strike (Blackswift) – New technology prototype **($750M Total) ** Note : Cyber protection is funded in DARPA BA 6 Air Force funding for Blackswift is in BA 7 15
DoD S&T - Macro Scale - S&T Investment and % of DoD Total Obligation Authority (TOA) - 12,000 3.3% Constant FY08 Dollars (in Millions) President's Budget Requests 11,000 3.0% Significant DoD S&T as % of DoD TOA TOA increase 10,000 2.7% 2.4% 9,000 2.1% 8,000 1.8% 7,000 1.5% FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03* FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 S&T President's Budget Requests S&T as % of DoD TOA 16
DoD S&T – Historical Context - In FY08 Constant Dollars - 14,000 Constant FY08 Dollars (in Millions) PBR09 12,000 Appropriations 10,000 0% real growth from PBR02 8,000 6,000 4,000 FY62 FY64 FY66 FY68 FY70 FY72 FY74 FY76 FY78 FY80 FY82 FY84 FY86 FY88 FY90 FY92 FY94 FY96 FY98 FY00 FY02 FY04 FY06 FY08 FY10 FY12 FY09 S&T request is among the highest 17
DoD R&E Funding By Budget Activity - President’s Budget Requests (in FY08 Constant Dollars) - 16,000 FY08 Constant Year Dollars (in Millions) 14,000 BA 4 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 BA 3 4,000 BA 2 2,000 BA 1 0 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 Basic Research (BA 1) Applied Research (BA 2) Advanced Development (BA 3) Adv Component Development and Prototypes (BA 4) 18
19 Strategic Context and Investment Focus
Desert Storm • US dominance over Soviet-era systems “shocked” potential adversaries and combined to give US conventional superiority – Precision Weapons – Night Vision – Low Observability – Networked Systems • The advent of information-based warfare feed the emergence of irregular warfare 20
Strategic Framework • US National Security Strategy (March 2006) set national imperative to continue the war on terrorism • 2006 Quadrennial Defense Review also restated the need for DoD to balance its capabilities across four categories of challenges: – Traditional – Irregular – Catastrophic Transformational – Disruptive • DDR&E S&T initiatives memorandum to SECDEF (24 Aug 07) 21
Recommend
More recommend
