first term survey presentation
play

First Term Survey Presentation Jason DeRousie 12/7/2015 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Academic and Student Affairs Office of Assessment First Term Survey Presentation Jason DeRousie 12/7/2015 1 Academic and Student Affairs Office of Assessment First Term Survey Response Sent to 4,296 new first year and 1,101 new transfer


  1. Academic and Student Affairs Office of Assessment First Term Survey Presentation Jason DeRousie 12/7/2015 1

  2. Academic and Student Affairs Office of Assessment First Term Survey Response • Sent to 4,296 new first year and 1,101 new transfer students at the beginning of Oct. • Response rates were very good – 48.1% response rate for first year students (1,711 complete; 358 partial) – 43.4% response rate for transfer students (423 complete, 55 partial) • Response rates have been climbing over the past several years 12/7/2015 2

  3. Academic and Student Affairs Office of Assessment Survey Respondents • Respondents generally matched the populations – By college, by race/ethnicity, by state residency – The exception was gender; females were over-represented • 84% of first year respondents live on campus; 72% of transfer respondents live off campus • First year respondents were traditional age (99.1% 17- 19); Transfer students were more likely to be older (67% were 18-21, but 20% were 25 or older) • ~90-91% identify as heterosexual/straight; ~7% identify as LGBTQ • ~11% of TR and 5% of FY were non-resident alien 12/7/2015 3

  4. Academic and Student Affairs Office of Assessment Caveats • This is just a first run at the data; more analysis to come • Differences are only provided to be thought- provoking • Though the survey was representative, results were from a subset of the population • This survey provides just a snapshot in time of the experiences of some new students 12/7/2015 4

  5. Academic and Student Affairs Office of Assessment Transition Programming • Virtually all FY respondents attended orientation (99.1%), as did almost all TR students (93.1%) • 90.1% of FY respondents attended WWW events compared to 51.9% of TR respondents • One challenge is encouraging connections between students and faculty/staff – More than 50% of FY and TR respondents had not at all/only minimally developed a relationship with faculty/staff by the time of the survey • Another challenge (possibly) is getting students actually involved instead of just aware of involvement 12/7/2015 5

  6. Academic and Student Affairs Office of Assessment Expectations vs. Reality • For both TR and FY respondents, the first day of classes was less difficult than expected, but managing daily life, coursework, and connecting with peers were more difficult • Being part of a diverse community was what they were expecting or was slightly easier • Transfer students had more accurate expectations – higher percentages “matched expectations” for each question • But for those TR respondents whose expectations were not matched, things were more difficult than expected 12/7/2015 6

  7. Academic and Student Affairs Office of Assessment Confidence (FY) • Overall, FY students were pretty confident in most things – more than 90% of respondents were very/somewhat confident in their ability to: – Use Moodle, identify resources for academic support, identity resources for personal/psychological support, identify groups to get involved with, and graduate on time • Less confident (though still pretty confident) about coping with stress (17.7% were not at all/not very confident), managing time (16.2%), connecting with other individuals on campus (13%), and choosing the right major (16.5%) 12/7/2015 7

  8. Academic and Student Affairs Office of Assessment Confidence (TR) • Overall, TR students were pretty confident in most things, but less so than FY students • They were least confident about their ability to cope with stress (22.8% were not at all/not very confident), effectively manage time (22.8%), identify a group that supports an identity (24.4%), or connect with other individuals on campus (22%) • Also not as confident in their ability to graduate on time as FY respondents (80.2% vs. 91.4% confident) 12/7/2015 8

  9. Academic and Student Affairs Office of Assessment Involvement • Students are getting involved and/or are aware of opportunities for involvement – More than 90% of FY and more than 85% of TR respondents were Somewhat/Very confident in their ability to identify a group to get involved with – More than ¾ of FY respondents have gotten involved Some/A Great Deal (only 6% Not at All) – But only slightly more than half of TR students had • However, there are students struggling with making social connections 12/7/2015 9

  10. Academic and Student Affairs Office of Assessment Social Connections • Both groups were hoping to make friends as a part of WWW, but neither actually did so at as great a rate as hoped (there was a 20-point gap between the % who hoped to and those who actually did) • 27.8% of TR and 23.0% of FY respondents attended WWW events alone but would have preferred to go with others • 8.7% of TR respondents had not made friends at all and 25.8% had only a little • 20.1% of TR respondents are often/constantly lonely • Connecting with peers was more difficult than many were expecting (~40% of FY and TR respondents said it was somewhat/much more difficult) 12/7/2015 10

  11. Academic and Student Affairs Office of Assessment Feelings (FY) • Some worrisome findings when students were asked how often they “Felt” certain negative emotions – 30.1% often/constantly feel overwhelmed – 22.7% often/constantly feel highly anxious – 22.8% are often/constantly concerned about financial issues • However, only 6.8% often/constantly feel that NC State is not a good fit 12/7/2015 11

  12. Academic and Student Affairs Office of Assessment Feelings (TR) • Similar results for transfer respondents (at higher levels than FY respondents) – 38.1% often/constantly feel overwhelmed – 35.1% are often/constantly concerned about financial issues – 24.8% often/constantly feel highly anxious – 20.1% are often/constantly lonely • However, only 5.2% often/constantly feel that NC State is not a good fit 12/7/2015 12

  13. Academic and Student Affairs Office of Assessment Early Alert Process • New for 2015 – students that answered specific questions in particular ways were flagged and then contacted • Two categories of alerts – psychological and academic (a third arose when some students triggered both alerts) • Students were contacted by Case Management and/or Academic Advising Services 12/7/2015 13

  14. Academic and Student Affairs Office of Assessment Early Alert Respondents • 75 FY students triggered an alert (3.7%) – 43 psych only; 22 academic only; 10 both • 31 TR students triggered an alert (6.5%) – 18 psych only; 9 academic only; 4 both • A strong relationship existed between these early alert respondents and many negative emotions and interactions 12/7/2015 14

  15. Academic and Student Affairs Office of Assessment Sense of Community • Asked several questions related to a sense of community, as well as the full Sense of Community (SCI) scale • In general, students gain a sense of community through programs for new students, but there is a subset that is not feeling that sense of community • 86.5% of TR and 92.6% of FY students gained a sense of community with NC State from WWW and 76.9% of FY students gained that from Convocation 12/7/2015 15

  16. Academic and Student Affairs Office of Assessment Sense of Community • 80-90% of TR and FY students say its moderately/ very important to experience a sense of community in the four areas – NC State overall, college/major, formal orgs, small groups • FY respondents are most interesting in community/belonging with small groups (e.g., friends) • TR respondents are most interested in developing a sense of community with their college/major • In general, TR respondents develop less of a sense of community in all areas than FY students – particularly with formal orgs (28.2% said they had not at all) 12/7/2015 16

  17. Academic and Student Affairs Office of Assessment SCI Scale • Only 6% of FY respondents said it is not very/not at all important to feel a sense of community with other NC State community members; 13% of TR students said the same • Four subscales created: – Membership, Influence, Fulfillment of Needs, and Shared Connection • FY respondents had higher scores (more positive) on all four subscales than TR students (statistically significant differences) 12/7/2015 17

  18. Academic and Student Affairs Office of Assessment Academic Sucess Managing time was the area of least confidence for both FY and TR • students TR students were a little more confident in their ability to choose • the right major (90% were Somewhat/Very Confident vs. 83% for FY respondents) Almost half of TR and FY students would have like to have more • interaction with their academic advisor in the first weeks/months of the semester (43% and 47%) 15% of FY students and 21.6% of TR students feel Often/Constantly • academically underprepared; another 27% of both feel that way Sometimes Almost 1 in 4 FY students (23.6%) and 1 in 5 TR students (19.8%) • had already utilized academic assistance for coursework “A Great Deal” (~30% more of both said they had done so “Some”) 12/7/2015 18

Recommend


More recommend