findings through nov 2016 beso basics
play

Findings through Nov. 2016 BESO Basics Update to RECO/CECO - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

BUILDING ENERGY SAVING ORDINANCE (BESO) DECEMBER 7, 2016 Findings through Nov. 2016 BESO Basics Update to RECO/CECO requiring tailored energy assessment at time of sale or periodically, based on building size The BESO process should


  1. BUILDING ENERGY SAVING ORDINANCE (BESO) DECEMBER 7, 2016 Findings through Nov. 2016

  2. BESO Basics ■ Update to RECO/CECO requiring tailored energy assessment at time of sale or periodically, based on building size ■ The BESO process should be: – EASY – AFFORDABLE – VALUABLE ■ Home Energy Score required for homes at time of sale or within 12 months. ■ Exemptions for high performing buildings 2

  3. Berkeley Building Stock Single Family Multifamily Commercial Square Footage ■ Approx. 30,000 buildings total 10% 10% 29% 29% ■ 21,000 single-family Count – 49% of square footage 16% 16% ■ 4,400 multifamily 49% 49% – 22% of square footage ■ 2,800 commercial & mixed-use – 29% of square footage 74% 74% 22% 22% 3

  4. BESO Compliance – Year 1 Tot otal Buildin dings gs under er BESO O Complia mpliance nce 99% ■ 921 single-family 79% – 4% of total stock ■ 108 small/medium 59% – 61 multifamily ■ 43 commercial 39% 19% -1% 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025 2027 2029 4 Year

  5. BESO Basics Breakdown of Compliance Types 6% ■ 712 buildings are fully compliant – 198 qualify as high 42% performance 33% ■ 338 buildings have active one-year deferrals 19% Report Submitted High Performance Exemption TOS Deferral Other Exemption 5

  6. Time of Sale Trends Monthly transactions by form type 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Reports High Performance Exemption TOS Deferrals Construction Exemption 6

  7. Enforcement Process Courtesy Violation Notice of Citation Letter Warning Violation Warning ■ 14% of buildings receive Courtesy Letter ■ 57% comply after Courtesy Letter; 99% after Notice of Violation ■ 5 buildings pending citations – Citation fee of $200, max of $1000 7

  8. The Home Energy Score 8

  9. HEScore Basics ■ DoE program created to allow comparison of estimated energy use between homes on a 1-10 scale ■ Each score corresponds to a range of energy uses, adjusted for climate. Homes are compared to a national average, not a reference home of similar size. ■ Easy to produce; takes less than an hour 9

  10. HEScore Cover 10

  11. 11

  12. 12

  13. Recommendations 13

  14. Home Energy Score Basics Distribut tribution ion of Home Energy gy Scores es ■ 431 assessments 80. performed so far 18% 70. ■ Average score 5 60. 13% 50. ■ 62% below 6; 12% 12% 11% Count contacted by Upgrade 40. High 9% Performing Advisor 7% 7% 30. 5% – 66 contacted 5% 20. – 23 active or 10. complete . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 upgrades Score 14

  15. HEScore Map 15

  16. How Building Age & Size Affect Score Initial Score vs Floor Area Initial Score vs Year Built 2020. 8000. 7000. 2000. 6000. 1980. 5000. Floor Area 1960. 4000. 1940. 3000. 1920. 2000. 1900. 1000. . 1880. . 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. . 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Score ■ Building age has little to no bearing on a home’s score ■ Large homes score lower than small homes – Especially influenced by window area ■ Small homes score across the 10-point scale 16

  17. Berkeley Homes – Building Envelope ■ Majority are poorly insulated – 33% have no attic insulation – 83% have no floor insulation – 50% have no wall insulation ■ Very few have insulation up to code – 8% have attic insulation to code – 0% have floor or wall insulation to code ■ 63% have single paned windows. 17

  18. Berkeley Homes – HVAC ■ Most houses are heated by natural gas ■ Heating Efficiency: Annual Fuel Utilization Efficiency – Code is 78% AFUE, best available 96% AFUE – Average: 76% AFUE – 12% of houses are at or above 90% AFUE – 64% are below code ■ 25% have natural gas wall furnaces ■ 5% have AC 18

  19. Feedback Please rate your experience based on the following: Energy efficiency information provided Quality of service of Energy Assessor Quality of service of City of Berkeley staff Ease of assessment Overall satisfaction 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Very satisfied – Satisfied – Neutral – Dissatisfied – Very dissatisfied – 19

  20. Feedback 20

  21. Feedback ■ 62% find HES easy to understand ■ 35% find it motivational – Priority area: how to motivate residents? 21

  22. Plans Moving Forward ■ Reconvene the BESO Technical Advisory Committee ■ HEScore Wish List: – Include “upgrade” score – Account for PV in Score, coming 2017 ■ Increase conversions from HEScore to Energy Upgrade ■ Measure conversions – Monthly Energy Upgrade California participation – PACE – Property Assessed Clean Energy loans – Building Permits – Community-wide consumption data 22

  23. Questions? 23

Recommend


More recommend