Europeisk forskning – fri eller politiskt styrd? SUHF 21 februari 2017 Dan Andrée VINNOVAs Brysselkontor Bild 1
Forskning på Europanivå – tillbakablick Europeiska forskningsområdet Horisont 2020 - Gemensamma utmaningar Mot FP9 och hur kan man påverka. Bild 2
The Framework Programme The Changing ERA Landscape FP1–FP5 Project based: Transnational projects 1983–2000 Mobility EU Access to infrastructures National/regional National/regional programmes programmes Ministry of Education and Research Sweden
2000 ERA – European Research Area • 5th freedom in the internal market (people, capital, goods, services) • freedom of knowledge Ministry of Education and Research Sweden
Why was ERA established? European researchers are increasingly unable to compete with teams from other major countries such as the United States and Japan. Research is also good for the economy, and the products which are the end result of research and innovation bring benefits to everyone. Research funding (both public and private) is lower in Europe than in competing countries, and this gap is widening (3%-goal). European research activities are currently fragmented, with most research being carried out in the framework of national and regional programmes. Because there is no coherent Community research policy, national research policies often overlap, while other areas are not studied anywhere. Many problems (e.g. climate change) are pan-European in nature, and require a co-ordinated approach by all the Member States. Increasing levels of R&D in industry creates jobs and improves competitiveness. Research and technology account for a large proportion of economic growth, and have a positive influence on the quality of life of all Europeans. Bild 5
EU programmes interact with national/regional programmes ERA 2000– FP6-FP7 Better coordination of national programmes: Integrated Projects, Networks of EU Excellence, ERA-NET, ERA-NET Plus, article 185, Joint Technology Initiatives (art 187) National/regional National/regional programmes programmes Ministry of Education and Research Sweden
FP 3 FP 4 FP 5 FP 6 FP 7 Information and Communications 1. Focusing and integrating Technologies European Research RACE 2 ACTS COOPERATION FP3 – FP7 ESPIRIT 3 ESPRIT 4 Information and communication IST IST technologies - ESSI 1 - ESSI 2 TELEMATICS 1C TELEMATICS 2C Security (LIBRARIES; ENS; Thematic structure DRIVE2; AIM; TIDE; DELTA; LRE; ORA; Food, Agriculture and TELMATPREP C Life Science and Technologies FOOD Fisheries, Biotechnology BIOTECH 1 BIOTECH 2 Quality of Life LIFESCIHEALTH Health BIOMED 1 BIOMED 2 ’unchanged’ AIR FAIR Nanosciences, BRITE/EURAM 2 Industrial Technologies nanotechnologies, materials & NMP new production techniques - CRAFT BRITE-EURAM 3 - AERO 1C GROWTH AEROSPACE Space SMT MAT Transport (incl. aeronautics) Transport TRANSPORT SUSTDEV Energy NO Political priorities Environment Environment (incl. climate ENV 2C change) ENV 1C MAST 3 MAST 2 IDEAS EESD NEST [European Research Council] Energy CAPACITIES JOULE JOULE 2 Research potential of THERMIE convergence regions International Cooperation INCO Cooperation with Third Countries and International Organisations INCO 2 STD 3 Socio-economic sciences and INCO CITIZENS humanities SME Research for the benefit of Targeted Socio-Economic Research SMEs IHP (HUMAN TSER SUPPORT POTENTIAL) ETAN 2. Structuring the ERA PEOPLE MOBILITY [Marie Curie actions] Stimulation of the Training & INNOVATION Mobility of Researchers INNOVATION - SME HCM TMR Research Infrastructures INFRASTRUCTURES Dissemination and Exploitation Science in society SOCIETY of Results INNOVATION Support to the coherent 3. Strengthening the development of research foundations of the ERA policies POLICIES Region’s of knowledge Coordination of Research COORDINATION RENA activities Joint Technology Initiatives Research and Training in the Report of the Expert Group, FP6 EURATOM Nuclear Sector EURATOM - 1. Controlled FUSION 11C FUSION 12C Thermonuclear EURATOM Indirect actions (fusion energy Fusion research; nuclear fission and evaluation, February 2009 radiation protection) NFS 1 NFS 2 - 2. Nuclear Fission Direct action ( JRC ) Ministry of Education and Research Sweden
FP3 – Horizon 2020 Budget increases Programme MEUR/year FP3 1425 FP4 3304 FP5 3740 FP6 4375 FP7 7767 (2014:10 000) Horizon 2020 10 000 FP9 ? Ministry of Education and Research Sweden
LUND Conference – July 2009 Declaration • the need to identify and respond to the grand challenges of our time – global warming, energy supply, water and food, ageing society, public health, pandemics and security • calls for a new deal among European institutions and Member States involving stakeholders http://www.vinnova.se/In-English/eupresidency/Passed- presidency-events/New-world-New-Solutions/ Ministry of Education and Research Sweden
EU and national programmes get more ‘integrated’ – Joint Programming – societal challenges EU ERA 2009 – Joint programming Driven by Member National/regional National/regional States programmes programmes Ministry of Education and Research Sweden
Horizon 2020 The basics - three priorities Excellent Industrial Societal science leadership challenges
Lund Revisited Next steps in tackling Societal Challenges Lund 2009 changed the Framework Programme Lund 2015 should change national programmes/strategies & importance of Impact Ministry of Education and Research Sweden
ERA Framework – 20 June 2012 ERA Road-map 29 May 2015 Increased effectiveness of national systems Increased transnational co-operation and competition (incl. Research Infrastrucures) An open labour market for researchers Gender equality and gender mainstreaming in research Optimal circulation and transfer of scientific knowledge International cooperation (separate Communication)
P2Ps - on background of 2008 Chart –2012 + 2014* MAPPI NG ERA - 2 *Clarotti & Delescluse: European Commission 2014 Alignment @ IGLOO, 1-15 G. Clarotti - 14
FP9 Bild 15
2014 Juncker’s priorities • A new boost for jobs, growth and investment • A connected digital single market • A resilient Energy Union with a forward-looking climate change policy • A deeper and fairer internal market with a strengthened industrial base • A deeper and fairer Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) • A reasonable and balanced free trade agreement with the United States • An area of Justice and Fundamental Rights based on mutual trust • Towards a new policy on migration • Europe as a stronger global actor • A Union of democratic change. Bild 16
Issue papers https://ec.europa.eu/research/evaluations/index_en.cfm?pg=hlg
Horizon 2020 Bild 18
Discussed areas for H2020 2018-2020 WP • Winning the race for a low-carbon, climate resilient Europe • Digitisation • Connecting economic and environmental gains – the Circular Economy • Supporting the Security Union Bild 19
The Framework Programme is not a research programme it is a political instrument where R&I and their impact are very important Horizon 2020 Bild 20
You need a strategy for participation and to give input! Bild 21
Strategy for increased participation and input to the European Commission (EC) Articulate what you would like to achieve in relation to e.g. national programmes/activities – EU policy National Networks – Public Sector European Networks – LERU, EUA Strategy for participation – e.g. follow, lead, new areas, standarisation etcetera Give ‘useful input’ to the Commission at the right time
Sverige i Horisont 2020 Tyskland Storbritannien Frankrike • En dryg tredjedel av deltagarna Spanien Italien – främst företag – har inte varit Nederländerna med i tidigare ramprogram Belgien Sverige • Svenska organisationer Österrike beviljade 552 M€ i 857 projekt Danmark Grekland • Svenska parter beviljas i snitt Finland Norge 500 000 € per Israel samverkansprojekt Irland Portugal • Sveriges andel 3,3 % Schweiz Polen Tjeckien Ungern 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Miljoner Euro (MEuro) eCORDA 1 juni 2016
Starka och svaga områden 7,00% 6,00% 5,00% 4,00% 3,00% 2,00% 1,00% 0,00% eCorda 1 juni 2016
Svenska organisationers deltagande topp 20 Beviljade Antal projekt- projektmedel (€) deltaganden 1 LUNDS UNIVERSITET 53 263 173 77 2 KAROLINSKA INSTITUTET 43 695 185 78 3 KUNGLIGA TEKNISKA HÖGSKOLAN 42 065 029 86 4 CHALMERS TEKNISKA HÖGSKOLA AB 40 499 895 68 5 UPPSALA UNIVERSITET 34 195 950 62 6 STOCKHOLMS UNIVERSITET 16 644 441 32 7 LINKÖPINGS UNIVERSITET 15 419 561 34 8 GÖTEBORGS UNIVERSITET 13 517 266 38 EUROPEAN SPALLATION SOURCE ESS AB 12 159 173 5 9 10 SP SVERIGES TEKNISKA FORSKNINGSINSTITUT AB 10 911 871 30 LULEÅ TEKNISKA UNIVERSITET 10 252 861 22 11 12 SWEREA MEFOS AB 8 117 525 3 UMEÅ UNIVERSITET 6 694 645 12 13 14 VETENSKAPSRÅDET 6 255 098 7 15 STOCKHOLMS STAD 6 120 929 3 16 SVERIGES LANTBRUKSUNIVERSITET 6 094 132 17 FORMAS 5 979 762 9 17 18 VOLVO PERSONVAGNAR AB 5 445 877 7 19 STATENS ENERGIMYNDIGHET 5 329 467 9 20 SEKAB E-TECHNOLOGY AB 5 114 571 2 eCorda 1 juni 2016
Fördelning svenska UoH
Recommend
More recommend
