eric nicholls spiral uk ken martin cornwall manufacturers
play

Eric Nicholls Spiral UK Ken Martin Cornwall Manufacturers Group - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Eric Nicholls Spiral UK Ken Martin Cornwall Manufacturers Group 1300 companies (>90% fewer than 10 emps) 19,000 employed 25% self employed 9.5% of Cornwall employment 732m GVA (10% of total) Multiplier 1.51


  1. Eric Nicholls – Spiral UK Ken Martin – Cornwall Manufacturers Group

  2.  1300 companies (>90% fewer than 10 emps)  19,000 employed – 25% self employed  9.5% of Cornwall employment  £732m GVA (10% of total)  Multiplier 1.51  Higher than average pay

  3.  35 companies  3350 employees (20% total)  £130m p.a. into Cornish economy  £500m turnover  94% exported out of Cornwall  42% exported out of UK  GVA £260m (36% of manufacturing GVA)

  4.  Bid by Cornwall Development Company (CDC) and CMG with private sector lead (Eric)  Needed organisation acceptable to SFA for admin – West of England Aerospace Forum (WEAF)  CMG – Project Management  Steering Group chaired by Eric  Quarterly meetings with SFA  Monthly claims

  5.  No risk to SFA  Only claimed when training complete and evidenced  Minimum paperwork for companies – state aid etc  Late start  Monthly claims  3 reprofiles

  6. Origin inal al New EooS 313,000 247,000 Company 549,000 454,000 Total 862,000 701,000 % 36% 35%

  7.  Four strands  Apprenticeships – Cornwall College  Continuous Improvement – South West Manufacturing Advisory Service (SWMAS)  Digital Sales and Marketing – Chartered Institute of Marketing (CIM)  CAD – Falmouth University

  8. Strand nd Old New Actual ual Apprenticeships 20 9 9 Continuous 50 65 75* Improvement CAD 20 22 24* Digital Sales & 20 14 16 Marketing *Possible because cost per participant is lower than originally planned.

  9.  4 strands – 1 company  3 strands – 2 companies  2 strands – 8 companies  1 strand – 9 companies  20 companies in total  18 SMEs

  10.  Power in hands of employers (development money and bespoke courses especially Apprenticeship strand)  Empowered companies – showed benefit of working together  Increased voice  Strengthened relationships  Raised awareness of other training funds and areas of co-operation

  11. Value Added  Problem Solving in companies as non- accredited  Job creation: 2 companies now have 5 apprentices in new posts  Progression: EooS – LRF. Top up to full apprenticeships. Plus 1-3 extra days training at higher level.  KTP – University of Falmouth  Wide eligibility criteria  University continues to be used post training

  12.  Bureaucracy/keeping it simple!!  Herding SMEs  Timescale  Changing circumstances of the companies involved – importance of re-profiling.

  13.  Flexible re-profiling  3 rd party broker for SMEs  Must be simple to administer  Awareness of true cost to company - benefit must outweigh direct and indirect costs  Ability to problem solve within the training  In kind match funding to be taken into account  Non accredited meant companies could get what they wanted and needed  Project Management and Admin costs - linked to project size - differentiation for SME projects

  14.  The project delivered what it said it was going to do  We would like another one just like it that is tailored to companies’ needs.

Recommend


More recommend