ensuring the
play

ENSURING THE TRUSTWORTHY REUSE OF HEALTH DATA FOR RESEARCH Dipak - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ENSURING THE TRUSTWORTHY REUSE OF HEALTH DATA FOR RESEARCH Dipak Kalra President Electronic Health Records for Clinical Research Ensuring the trustworthy reuse of health data for research Compliance with data protection legislation, at a


  1. ENSURING THE TRUSTWORTHY REUSE OF HEALTH DATA FOR RESEARCH Dipak Kalra President Electronic Health Records for Clinical Research

  2. Ensuring the trustworthy reuse of health data for research ▪ Compliance with data protection legislation, at a European level and across all European Member States ▪ Consistent information governance practices and expectations across Europe ▪ Societally acceptable codes of good practice for governing many uses of health data ▪ Reflect state of the art in privacy protection and information security ▪ Greater confidence and reduced risk for those providing data for research use e.g. hospitals, GPs, patients ▪ Greater confidence and reduced risk for those performing the research, managing the data or sponsoring the research ▪ Greater societal endorsement of public health and research uses of health data ▪ A scaling up of learning from health data, leading to more rapid innovation in treatments, and accelerated health system transformation towards better health outcomes 2

  3. Some key principles for trustworthy reuse of health data: the EHR4CR example Segregation… of the research data warehouse from the EHR De- identification… individual patient data are de-identifed (anonymised, pseudonymised, to best Control… practice standards) lock/unlock access by hospital or GP practice Consolidation… only aggregated patient numbers leave the healthcare site Governance… independent institute ensures data are accessed in a trustworthy way 3

  4. Need to remove the bottlenecks to accessing and combining health data from diverse sources across Europe • Only patient counts leave a hospital • Transient data pools per specific • Provenance metadata captured throughout research question and team • Platform never stores or communicates the architecture • Ethical code of practice data about single data subjects • Strong separation between zones for • Only treating physicians can re-identify • Limited to (pre-agreed) bona fide clinical use and research use candidate patients research • Pseudo-identification and linkage managed • Standard operating rules • Pre-agreed purposes of use by a trusted “middle” zone • Robust identify management, • allows flexibility as to where the 'linkage • Requirement for data sharing information security and audit zone' is provided agreements There is a need for harmonised best practices & sustainability 4

  5. i~HD information governance services ▪ Quality labelling criteria for the platform and services, including components deployed at hospitals, and in other data sources ▪ Codes of Practice for feasibility studies and for remote data access and sharing ▪ Standard Operating Rules ▪ Legal requirements and their implementation through specific technical safeguards and specified duties, to ensure proper use of the platform ▪ Standard Operating Procedures ▪ Access Controls, Incident Management, Audit & Monitoring, Study Management, Organisation Management ▪ Staff competence checklist and training resources about data management and privacy protection when using the platform ▪ for hospital staff, pharma and academic research staff, for platform service providers ▪ i~HD Information Governance Board, providing oversight 5

  6. Staff competence ▪ Staff using the platform services and applications, in pharma, hospitals, and the service providers must ▪ meet defined standards of knowledge and competence ▪ work to an agreed Code of Conduct and Ethics ▪ a high-level catalogue of rights and duties concerning privacy while conducting clinical trials and reusing clinical data for research ▪ Main areas covered ▪ Work To high professional standards ▪ Personal behaviour, processes, Good practices, Data and systems, Outcomes, Mitigating risk ▪ Respect the rights and professional interests of others (staff and colleagues) ▪ Protect and promote the interests of patients and the public ▪ Promote the standards and status of clinical research professionals 12

  7. ECRIN, infrastructure for multinational trials in Europe ▪ Coordinating services provided by national partners  ESFRI-roadmap infrastructure  „ERIC“ status  Coordinating centre (Paris)  National partners / national hubs  European Correspondent hosted in national hub  Develop tools for multinational trials  Support trial preparation and conduct  Including data managemeent services through ECRIN-certified data centres 13 13

  8. i~HD Information Governance Board: activities ▪ Confirms the suitability of the i~HD governance instruments ▪ Confirms that all deployed platform components and services have been certified, and all connected organisations have a staff accreditation programme ▪ Reviews activity and incident logs on a regular basis ▪ Receives and investigates all incidents and apply escalation and remediation as appropriate ▪ Provides regular reports for the i~HD Executive Board, key stakeholders and for the public ▪ Monitors the evolving legislative and regulatory landscape, and make recommendations for updates to the governance instruments as needed 14

  9. i~HD Information Governance Board: proposed constitution ▪ Patient association representatives ▪ Privacy protection legal experts, EU and some national ▪ Hospital privacy protection officers ▪ Medicines regulatory experts ▪ Information security experts ▪ Service Provider representative as an observer ▪ i~HD appointed representative as an observer ▪ Other expertise may be co-opted as needed 15

  10. Enriching knowledge and enhancing care through health data

Recommend


More recommend