energy efficient routing with osm
play

Energy Efficient routing with OSM - reach your destination fast AND - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Energy Efficient routing with OSM - reach your destination fast AND eco - SOTM 2018 Milan 30.7.2018 - Dr. Arndt Brenschede - B(ike?)Router ? 01 / 2013 Initial release BRouter . 01 / 2014 first, experimental car


  1. Energy Efficient routing with OSM - reach your destination fast AND eco - SOTM 2018 – Milan – 30.7.2018 - Dr. Arndt Brenschede -

  2. B(ike?)Router ? ● 01 / 2013 Initial release „BRouter“ ● …. ● 01 / 2014 first, experimental car routing ● …. ● 05 / 2016 turning instructions ● 12 / 2016 turn restrictions ● 09 / 2017 kinematic model ● 10 / 2017 Map-QA road network Usable car routing

  3. Status Quo ● Market is dominated by motorway-centric routing, optimizing travel-time only ● Example: Stuttgart → Luxemburg (Router: OSRM), Northern suburb 351 km Time: 3h 26m

  4. Status Quo ● Market is dominated by motorway-centric routing optimizing travel. ● Example: Stuttgart → Luxemburg (Router: OSRM), City center 313 km Time: 3h 25m ( -38km, same travel time)

  5. Cost-Function in Routing: Cost = Time

  6. Cost-Function in Energy Efficient Routing: Cost = Time + Energy P weight P weight = Weighting Power ( measured in kW)

  7. Specify Energy Preference: 2 Options V-max P-weight (km/h) (kW) 61 3,7 89 11 110 22 120 28,6 144 50

  8. Equivalence of P(weight) und v(max) ! P weight = 10 kW Cost = Time + Energy P weight Cost-Minimum v max

  9. Equivalence of P(weight) und v(max) ! P weight = 10 kW Cost = Time + Energy P weight Cost-Minimum v max 3 − P aux P weight = c w ∗ A ∗ρ∗ v max

  10. Equivalence of P(weight) und v(max) ! Entropy P weight = 10 kW Cost = Time + Energy P weight Cost-Minimum v max 3 − P aux P weight = c w ∗ A ∗ρ∗ v max

  11. Routing depending on Energy-Preference Aschaffenburg→Bensheim Vmax = 160 km/h ====> 52 Minutes, 23 kWh

  12. Routing depending on Energy-Preference Aschaffenburg→Bensheim Vmax = 120 km/h ====> 72 Minutes, 9 kWh

  13. Routing depending on Energy-Preference Aschaffenburg→Bensheim Vmax = 60 km/h ====> 83 Minutes, 6,5 kWh

  14. Routing depending on Energy-Preference Aschaffenburg→Bensheim Vmax = 60 km/h ====> 83 Minutes, 6,5 kWh

  15. Energy – Time Diagram 160 km/h 120 km/h 60 km/h

  16. Energy – Time Diagram 160 km/h 6 ==> 23 kWh = + 280 % 120 km/h 60 km/h

  17. Energy – Time Diagram 160 km/h 120 km/h 60 km/h

  18. Energy – Time Diagram 160 km/h 120 km/h 60 km/h

  19. Energy – Time Diagram 160 km/h 120 km/h 60 km/h

  20. Energy – Time Diagram 130 km/h 90 km/h + 44 %

  21. Energy – Time Diagram 130 km/h 90 km/h + 180 %

  22. Should I ? Really ? - travelling on minor roads needs high quality maps -

  23. Connectivity? Status Quo 09/2017 B38 B426

  24. Connectivity? Status Quo 09/2017 2 Errors in 640 sqkm ==> ca. 1000 Errors in Germany ( 357.000 qkm )

  25. QA Road-Network: Suspect Scanner / Manager

  26. QA Road-Network: Suspect Scanner / Manager

  27. QA Road-Network: Suspect Scanner / Manager

  28. Outlook / TODOs - implement road network QA world-wide - Update BRouter integration in popular MapTools: Name Turning- Time of Street- Direction- Lane- Hints Arrival names Hints mapping LocusMaps Pro o.k Almost missing n.a. n.a done OsmAnd Plus missing missing missing missing missing OruxMaps n.a. n.a n.a n.a n.a - … Integrated driving assistence for electric cars ?

  29. Thank you! SOTM 2018 – Milan – 30.7.2018 - Dr. Arndt Brenschede -

Recommend


More recommend