ems s in in t tom ompk pkin ins cou ounty nty
play

EMS S in in T Tom ompk pkin ins Cou ounty nty October 16, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

EMS S in in T Tom ompk pkin ins Cou ounty nty October 16, 2017 Presentation to the Tompkins County Health Planning Council Lee Shurtleff Director Department of Emergency Response ALL CALLS LS DI DISPATCHED CHED 2006 2016 49,537


  1. EMS S in in T Tom ompk pkin ins Cou ounty nty October 16, 2017 Presentation to the Tompkins County Health Planning Council Lee Shurtleff Director Department of Emergency Response

  2. ALL CALLS LS DI DISPATCHED CHED 2006 2016 49,537 66,226

  3. CALLS LLS DI DISP SPATCHED CHED PER ER DI DISCIPLINE CIPLINE  LAW 34,315 45,149  FIRE 4,436 5,017  EMS 10,786 16,060

  4. Fi Fire P e Protec ecti tion on Cos osts b ts by T y Town wnsh ship ip

  5. Amb mbulance lance – Total tal Responses sponses Dispa patch tched ed

  6. Resc escue ue Squa uad d – Fi First R st Resp espon onse se

  7. FI FIRE RE RE RESPONSE PONSE TREND RENDS Fire 1976 2016 Alarms Adjusted Brooktondale 45 67 7 60 Cayuga Heights 112 194 102 92 Etna 45 60 11 49 Danby 55 75 11 64 Dryden 114 320 187 133 Enfield 57 82 8 74 Freeville 36 129 76 53 Groton 101 109 25 84 Ithaca 990 2,410 1,366 1,044 Lansing 172 358 161 197 McLean 39 46 4 42 Newfield 71 102 8 94 Slaterville 39 32 3 29 Speedsville 5 10 1 9 Trumansburg 130 277 89 188 Varna 58 95 18 77 Ithaca 990 2,410 1,366 1,044 All Others 1,078 1,956 711 1,245 Fire 2,068 4,366 2,077 2,289 Rescue 436 4,739 Total 2,068 9,105 Mutual Aid 221 774

  8. EM EMS DI DISPATCH CHED ED IN IN COU OUNT NTY

  9. PO POPU PULA LATION TION IN INCREASE REASE

  10. AGE GE DEM DEMOG OGRAPH RAPHICS ICS 90,000 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 Under 18 Under 60 40,000 60+ 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 1980 2000 2015 Est.

  11. EM EMD D DE DETERMINA ERMINANTS NTS 9886 – Ambulance calls dispatched in County and preliminarily coded 7564 – processed by Dispatch as full PRO-QA 1173 – “send” 1149 – taken by 3 rd party, assist, fire, standby

  12. CAL ALLS LS BY PR PROTOCOL OCOL

  13. FAL ALLS LS in in 20 2016 6 – 1,2 ,228 28 800 700 600 500 400 Female 300 Male 200 100 0 TOTAL Teens 30s 50s 70s 90s Of note: 399 or 32.5% of all calls occurred in a “congregate” living site … and almost half of that number occurred in one site

  14. PROTOCOL OCOL 31: UNCO CONSCIOUS NSCIOUS PER ERSON ON 100 90 <9/>99 80 Teens 20-29 70 30-39 60 40-49 50 50-59 60-69 40 70-79 30 80-89 20 90-99 Unknown 10 0

  15. 20 2016 6 – EC ECHO HO CAL ALLS LS

  16. Sco copes pes of of Pr Prac acti tice ce

  17. Amb mbulance ulance Str trength ength – Total tal Cer erti tified ied

  18. First st Response sponse EM EMS Certif tification ication Levels els

  19. Cer erti tified ed EM EMT/ T/EMS EMS Str tren ength th: Res escue ue Squa uads ds

  20. Inc ncre rease se in E n EMS MS – 911 Di Disp spat atched ched Num umber er of of Pr Provi vide ders

  21. Con once cerns rns:

  22. Con once cerns rns:

  23. Con once cerns rns:

  24. Con once cerns rns:

  25. Is Is th ther ere a e a me mean ans t s to re o redu duce ce ca call l vol olumes: umes:  Falls/elderly  Substance abuse  Mental Health  Leverage health care initiatives (readmissions - DSRIP)  Community Paramedicine (mobile integrated health care)

  26. EXP XPECT ECTATION TIONS: S:  Have we defined them?  Are we meeting them?  Can we sustain the EMS system “as is”?

  27. Di Disc scus ussi sion on:

Recommend


More recommend