economic viewpoint on risk transfer
play

Economic viewpoint on risk transfer Eric Marsden - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Economic viewpoint on risk transfer Eric Marsden <eric.marsden@risk-engineering.org> How much risk should my organization take up? 1 Understand difgerent methods for transferring the fjnancial component of risk 2 Understand concepts of


  1. Economic viewpoint on risk transfer Eric Marsden <eric.marsden@risk-engineering.org> How much risk should my organization take up?

  2. 1 Understand difgerent methods for transferring the fjnancial component of risk 2 Understand concepts of expected value , expected utility and risk aversion 3 Know how to calculate the value of insurance (risk premium) 2 / 24 Learning objectives

  3. 1000 € for sure 50% chance of winning 3000 € 50% chance of winning 0€ Option A Option B 3 / 24 Which do you prefer?

  4. 1000 € for sure 50% chance of winning 3000 € 50% chance of winning 0€ Option A Option B 𝔽(𝐵) = 1000 € 3 / 24 Which do you prefer? 𝔽(𝐶) = 1 2 × 3000 € + 1 2 × 0 = 1500 €

  5. 1000 € for sure 50% chance of winning 3000 € 50% chance of winning 0€ Option A Option B 𝔽(𝐵) = 1000 € When comparing two gambles, a reasonable start is to compare their expected value 3 / 24 Which do you prefer? 𝔽(𝐶) = 1 2 × 3000 € + 1 2 × 0 = 1500 €

  6. probability of that outcome 𝔽(𝑡𝑗𝑢𝑣𝑏𝑢𝑗𝑝𝑜) = ∑ 𝑝𝑣𝑢𝑑𝑝𝑛𝑓𝑡 𝑗 Pr (𝑗) × 𝑋(𝑗) ▷ Interpretation: the amount that I would earn on average if the gamble were repeated many times • if all probabilities are equal, it’s the average value ▷ For a binary choice between 𝐵 and 𝐶 : wealth if outcome 𝐵 occurs 4 / 24 Expected value ▷ Expected value of a gamble: the value of each possible outcome times the 𝔽(𝑋) = Pr (𝐵) × 𝑋 𝐵 + (1 − Pr (𝐵)) × 𝑋 𝐶

  7. Playing black 13 in roulette → Each time you place a bet in the roulette table, you should expect to lose 5.26% of your bet Note: initial bet is returned as well as 35€ for each euro bet Tie expected value of betting 1€ on black 13 in American roulette (which has 38 pockets numbered 1 5 / 24 to 36 plus 0 plus 00, and a payout for a single winning number of 35 to one) is 35 € × 1 38 + −1€ × 37 38 = −0.0526 € 1 3% 1 Win 35,00 € 35,00 € roll Bet on black 13 -0,05 € 37 97% 2 Lose -1,00 € -1,00 €

  8. ▷ Risk in fjnance (portfolio risk): anticipated variability of the value of my portfolio ▷ Standard deviation of the expected value of the return on my portfolio • return on an investment = next value - present value ▷ In general, riskier assets have a higher return ▷ A portfolio manager can reduce risk by diversifying assets 6 / 24 Finance: risk as standard deviation of expected value

  9. and type of equipment sold ▷ Conclusion : company should sell both to reduce risk Expected profit as a function of weather 30 k€ 12 k€ Heaters 12 k€ 30 k€ AC Cold Hot Weather 7 / 24 • σ(profjt) = 0€ • 𝔽 (profjt) = 21 k€ ▷ If company sells both • σ(profjt) = 9 k€ • 𝔽 (profjt) = 21 k€ ▷ If company sells only heaters • σ(profjt) = 9 k€ • 𝔽 (profjt) = 21 k€ ▷ If company sells only ac ▷ Assume equiprobability of hot and cold weather ▷ Example: company selling air conditioners and heaters are not closely related Diversifjcation: example ▷ Diversifjcation = reducing risk by allocating resources to difgerent activities whose outcomes

  10. and type of equipment sold ▷ Conclusion : company should sell both to reduce risk Expected profit as a function of weather 30 k€ 12 k€ Heaters 12 k€ 30 k€ AC Cold Hot Weather 7 / 24 • σ(profjt) = 0€ • 𝔽 (profjt) = 21 k€ ▷ If company sells both • σ(profjt) = 9 k€ • 𝔽 (profjt) = 21 k€ ▷ If company sells only heaters • σ(profjt) = 9 k€ • 𝔽 (profjt) = 21 k€ ▷ If company sells only ac ▷ Assume equiprobability of hot and cold weather ▷ Example: company selling air conditioners and heaters are not closely related Diversifjcation: example ▷ Diversifjcation = reducing risk by allocating resources to difgerent activities whose outcomes

  11. ▷ You fmip a coin repeatedly until a tail fjrst appears • the pot starts at 1€ and doubles every time a head appears • you win whatever is in the pot the fjrst time you throw tails and the game ends ▷ For example: • T (tail on the fjrst toss): win 1€ • H T (tail on the second toss): win 2€ • H H T: win 4€ • H H H T: win 8€ ▷ Which would you prefer? A 10€ for sure B the right to play the St. Petersburg game 8 / 24 The Saint Petersberg game

  12. • 1 st round: Pr (𝑈𝑏𝑗𝑚𝑡) = 1 • 2 nd round: Pr (𝐼𝑓𝑏𝑒𝑡) × Pr (𝑈𝑏𝑗𝑚𝑡) = 1 • 3 rd round: Pr (𝐼𝑓𝑏𝑒𝑡) × Pr (𝐼𝑓𝑏𝑒𝑡) × Pr (𝑈𝑏𝑗𝑚𝑡) = 1 • 𝑙 𝑢ℎ round: • with probability ½ you win 1€, ¼ you win 2€, 1 ⁄ 8 you win 4€, 1 ⁄ 16 you win 8€ … • 𝔽(𝑥𝑗𝑜) = 1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 + … = ∞ ▷ How much can you expect to win on average? 9 / 24 2𝑙 1 8 4 2 ▷ Tie probability of throwing a tail on a given round: The Saint Petersberg game ▷ What is the expected value of the St. Petersburg game?

  13. 9 / 24 8 ▷ Tie probability of throwing a tail on a given round: ▷ How much can you expect to win on average? 2 2𝑙 4 1 The Saint Petersberg game ▷ What is the expected value of the St. Petersburg game? • 1 st round: Pr (𝑈𝑏𝑗𝑚𝑡) = 1 • 2 nd round: Pr (𝐼𝑓𝑏𝑒𝑡) × Pr (𝑈𝑏𝑗𝑚𝑡) = 1 • 3 rd round: Pr (𝐼𝑓𝑏𝑒𝑡) × Pr (𝐼𝑓𝑏𝑒𝑡) × Pr (𝑈𝑏𝑗𝑚𝑡) = 1 • 𝑙 𝑢ℎ round: • with probability ½ you win 1€, ¼ you win 2€, 1 ⁄ 8 you win 4€, 1 ⁄ 16 you win 8€ … • 𝔽(𝑥𝑗𝑜) = 1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 + … = ∞

  14. ▷ Expected value of the game is infjnite, and yet few people would be willing to pay more than 20€ to play • “the St. Petersburg Paradox” ▷ Bernoulli (1738): • the “value” of a gamble is not its monetary value • people attach some subjective value, or utility , to monetary outcomes ▷ Bernoulli’s suggestion: people do not seek to maximize expected values, but instead maximize expected utility • marginal utility declines as wealth increases (poor people value increments in wealth more than rich people do) • an individual is not necessarily twice as happy getting 200€ compared to 100€ • people are “risk averse” 10 / 24 The Saint Petersberg game

  15. ▷ Utility: measure of goal attainment or want satisfaction • 𝑉(𝑦) = utility function for the good 𝑦 ▷ Utility functions are monotonically increasing: more is preferred to less • 𝑉’(𝑦) > 0 ▷ Marginal utility of 𝑦 : the change in utility resulting from a 1 unit change in 𝑦 Δ𝑦 ▷ Principle of diminishing marginal utility • each successive unit of a good yields less utility than the one before it Image source: Banksy 11 / 24 Utility in classical microeconomics • 𝑁𝑉(𝑦) def = Δ𝑉(𝑦)

  16. ▷ Expected utility is the probability weighted average of the utility from the potential monetary values ▷ 𝔽(𝑉) = ∑ 𝑝𝑣𝑢𝑑𝑝𝑛𝑓𝑡 Pr (𝑝𝑣𝑢𝑑𝑝𝑛𝑓 𝑗 ) × 𝑉(𝑝𝑣𝑢𝑑𝑝𝑛𝑓 𝑗 ) ▷ 𝑉 is the person’s von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function 12 / 24 Expected utility ▷ Expected value is the probability weighted average of the monetary value

  17. Future state is unknown. Probability of each possibility is well-known. Risk Possible future states are known. Probability of each possibility is not well-known. Uncertainty Future states are not well known or delimited. Radical uncertainty 13 / 24 Terminology: risk and uncertainty Terminology developed in economics, following the work of F. Knight [1923]

  18. ▷ People’s preferences can be represented by a function 𝑉 • where 𝑉(𝐵) > 𝑉(𝐶) ifg 𝐵 ≻ 𝐶 ( 𝐵 is preferred to 𝐶 ) ▷ 𝑉 is a way of modeling people’s behaviour when faced with risk Tie expected utility framework is useful for reasoning about behaviour in situations of risk, but is not a full explanation. Tie economist Maurice Allais showed that one of the axioms of EU, independence (two gambles mixed with a third one maintain the same preference order as when the two are presented independently of the third one), does not model real behaviour. Prospect theory is a more recent theory which models a wider range of real behaviour. 14 / 24 Expected utility hypothesis

  19. Risk aversion (psychology & economics) Reluctance of a person to accept a gamble with an uncertain payofg rather than another gamble with a more certain, but possibly lower, expected payofg. ▷ I have 10€. Suppose I can play a gamble with 50% chance of winning 5€, and 50% chance of losing 5€. ▷ If I refuse to play: • Expected value of wealth = • Expected utility = ▷ If I play: • Expected value of wealth = • Expected utility = 15 / 24 Risk aversion

  20. Risk aversion (psychology & economics) Reluctance of a person to accept a gamble with an uncertain payofg rather than another gamble with a more certain, but possibly lower, expected payofg. ▷ I have 10€. Suppose I can play a gamble with 50% chance of winning 5€, and 50% chance of losing 5€. ▷ If I refuse to play: • Expected value of wealth = 10€ • Expected utility = ▷ If I play: • Expected value of wealth = • Expected utility = 15 / 24 Risk aversion

Recommend


More recommend