ech polymerization qualification of a solvent compatible
play

ECH polymerization Qualification of a solvent compatible with REACh - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ECH polymerization Qualification of a solvent compatible with REACh regulation G. Eck, M. Fourdinier, T . Alaime, C. Bedos, V. Chauffour 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 1 2018, Seville, Spain


  1. ECH polymerization Qualification of a solvent compatible with REACh regulation G. Eck, M. Fourdinier, T . Alaime, C. Bedos, V. Chauffour 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 1 2018, Seville, Spain

  2.  Introduction / Context  Middle term replacement of DCE  Lab scale results  Process file for scaling up to industrial scale  Conclusion 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 2 2 2018, Seville, Spain

  3. INTRODUCTION / CONTEXT ITAR AR REA REACh Ch (US/DoD or US/DoC regulations ) EUROPE has to EAR AR face to different regulations • Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and • International Traffic in Arms regulations / Restriction of Chemicals Export Administration Regulation • Adopted to improve the protection of human • Designed to help ensure that defense health and the environment from the risks that related technology does not get into the can be posed by chemicals wrong hands 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 3 3 2018, Seville, Spain

  4. INTRODUCTION / CONTEXT REACh regulation  REACH applies to all chemicals (except polymers)  Chemicals involved in industrial process  Chemicals in our day-to-day lives : cleaning products, paints, clothes, furniture, electrical appliances, …  Companies must identify and manage the risks linked to the substances they manufacture and market in the EU as manufacturers, importers or downstream users  In the long run, the most hazardous substances should be substituted with less dangerous ones 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 4 4 2018, Seville, Spain

  5. INTRODUCTION / CONTEXT REACh regulation IMPACT ON EXPLOSIVE GRANULAR COMPOSITIONS EXPLOSIVE CATALYSTS BINDER EXPLOSIVE COMPOSITION BONDING SOLVENTS AGENT PLASTICIZER 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 5 5 2018, Seville, Spain

  6. INTRODUCTION / CONTEXT REACh regulation IMPACT ON EXPLOSIVE GRANULAR COMPOSITIONS EXPLOSIVE CATALYSTS BINDER EXPLOSIVE COMPOSITION SOLVENTS BONDING DCE AGENT PLASTICIZER 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 6 6 2018, Seville, Spain

  7. INTRODUCTION / CONTEXT Impact on PECH / GAP synthesis NaN 3 CH 2 Cl H + H O CH CH 2 O H H O CH CH 2 O H O CH 2 Cl CH 2 N 3 n DCE n ECH PECH GAP  Impact of REACH regulation on DCE use as a solvent  Authorized for use up to the end of 2021  Prohibited after that 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 7 7 2018, Seville, Spain

  8. INTRODUCTION / CONTEXT Impact on PECH / GAP synthesis  Middle term replacement  Organic solvent not yet impacted by REACh  Process file ready for scale up to the industrial workshop  Long term replacement  Research studies to find new ways to polymerize ECH 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 8 8 2018, Seville, Spain

  9.  Introduction / Context  Middle term replacement of DCE  Lab scale results  Process file for scaling up to industrial scale  Conclusion 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 9 9 2018, Seville, Spain

  10. LAB SCALE RESULTS  Experiments performed on 350 g. of ECH in DCE, solvents A and B  Reaction medium T ° set between TR1 and TR2  Double jacket T ° set at T1 or T2  Addition rate of ECH regulated by the reaction medium T °  Special attention to  The initiation of the polymerization and the temperature peak that is observed when the reaction starts.  The propagation phase of the polymerization  The characterization of the polymer PECH: Mn / Mw and hydroxyl content 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 10 10 2018, Seville, Spain

  11. LAB SCALE RESULTS PECH characterizations Double Jacket T° Ref. Solvent OH content Mn Mw I (°C) (eq/kg) Average at industrial scale 1790 1890 1.05 0.80 DCE-1 DCE T 2 1670 1890 1.13 0.80 DCE-2 DCE T 1 1750 1890 1.08 0.75 A-1 A T 2 1690 1910 1.13 0.86 A-2 A T 1 1770 1910 1.08 0.84 A-3 A T 1 1820 1960 1.08 0.80 B-1 B T 1 1770 1900 1.08 0.83 B-2 B T 2 1750 1910 1.09 0.78 B-3 B T 1 1770 1910 1.08 0.81 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 11 11 2018, Seville, Spain

  12. LAB SCALE RESULTS PECH characterizations Double Jacket T° Ref. Solvent OH content Mn Mw I (°C) (eq/kg) Average at industrial scale 1790 1890 1.05 0.80 DCE-1 DCE T 2 1670 1890 1.13 0.80 DCE-2 DCE T 1 1750 1890 1.08 0.75 A-1 A T 2 1690 1910 1.13 0.86  DCE-2 seems representative of the industrial scale A-2 A T 1 1770 1910 1.08 0.84 A-3 A T 1 1820 1960 1.08 0.80 B-1 B T 1 1770 1900 1.08 0.83 B-2 B T 2 1750 1910 1.09 0.78 B-3 B T 1 1770 1910 1.08 0.81 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 12 12 2018, Seville, Spain

  13. LAB SCALE RESULTS PECH characterizations Double Jacket T° Ref. Solvent OH content Mn Mw I (°C) (eq/kg) Average at industrial scale 1790 1890 1.05 0.80 DCE-1 DCE T 2 1670 1890 1.13 0.80  Reproducible results for experiments performed in the same DCE-2 DCE T 1 1750 1890 1.08 0.75 conditions A-1 A T 2 1690 1910 1.13 0.86 A-2 A T 1 1770 1910 1.08 0.84 A-3 A T 1 1820 1960 1.08 0.80 B-1 B T 1 1770 1900 1.08 0.83 B-2 B T 2 1750 1910 1.09 0.78 B-3 B T 1 1770 1910 1.08 0.81 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 13 13 2018, Seville, Spain

  14. LAB SCALE RESULTS PECH characterizations Double Jacket T° Ref. Solvent OH content Mn Mw I (°C) (eq/kg) Average at industrial scale 1790 1890 1.05 0.80  At lab scale, no significant impact of polymerization conditions on DCE-1 DCE T 2 1670 1890 1.13 0.80 PECH characteristics DCE-2 DCE T 1 1750 1890 1.08 0.75 A-1 A T 2 1690 1910 1.13 0.86 A-2 A T 1 1770 1910 1.08 0.84 A-3 A T 1 1820 1960 1.08 0.80 B-1 B T 1 1770 1900 1.08 0.83 B-2 B T 2 1750 1910 1.09 0.78 B-3 B T 1 1770 1910 1.08 0.81 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 14 14 2018, Seville, Spain

  15. LAB SCALE RESULTS COOLING AT T 1 Solvent B  Exothermic DCE phenomenon for T° (°C) Solvent A all solvents  Peak T ° slightly TR 2 shifted in time for solvent A TR 1 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Time (min) DCE Solvent A Solvent B 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 15 15 2018, Seville, Spain

  16. LAB SCALE RESULTS COOLING AT T 2 Solvent B TR 1 DCE  Good control for TR 2 DCE and solvent B T° (°C)  More difficult to Solvent A control in solvent A 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Time (min) DCE Solvent A Solvent B 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 16 16 2018, Seville, Spain

  17. LAB SCALE RESULTS CONCLUSION Based on lab scale experiments, PECH characterizations Double Jacket T° solvent B seems to OH content Mn Mw (°C) (eq/kg) be the best T 1 1770 1900 0.83 candidate to replace T 2 1750 1910 0.78 DCE Scale up to industrial scale to be made 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 17 17 2018, Seville, Spain

  18.  Introduction / Context  Middle term replacement of DCE  Lab scale results  Process file for scaling up to industrial scale  Conclusion 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 18 18 2018, Seville, Spain

  19. PROCESS FILE  Material balance  Heat balance  Sequence of manufacturing steps  Production time Comparison for solvent B and DCE 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 19 19 2018, Seville, Spain

  20. PROCESS FILE Material balance Vessel N°1 Vessel N°2 Recovered or engaged Raw materials Initial loading quantities ECH M1 0 kg Solvent B M2 M2 Initiator M3 0 kg Catalyst M4 Reacted PECH M1 Washing ingredients M5 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 20 20 2018, Seville, Spain

  21. PROCESS FILE Heat balance  Heat exchange capacity of reactors (kcal/h) : ϕ = K x S x ΔT  K = Heat transfer coefficient (kcal/h/m 2 .k)  S = Exchange area (m 2 )   T = Mean logarithmic temperature Cold fluid / Hot fluid  Amount of heat (J.) : Q = m x Cp x Δ T  m = Mass of components (kg)  Cp = Specific heat of the components (J/kg.K)   T = Temperature difference Initial state / Final state 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 21 21 2018, Seville, Spain

  22. PROCESS FILE Heat balance Synthesis phase Heat balance (compared to DCE in % ) Q Total (kcal) 72% Loading and heating t (min) 80%  cooling medium (kg/h) 100% Q Total (kcal) 99.8% t (min) 100% Polymerization  cooling medium (kg/h) 100% Q Total (kcal) 97.6% t (min) 96% Solvent extraction  heating medium (kg/h) 100% 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 22 22 2018, Seville, Spain

  23.  Introduction / Context  Middle term replacement of DCE  Lab scale results  Scale up  Process file for scaling up to industrial scale  Conclusion 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 23 23 2018, Seville, Spain

Recommend


More recommend