draft presentation of results of the second joint wood
play

Draft presentation of results of the second Joint Wood Energy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Draft presentation of results of the second Joint Wood Energy Enquiry (JWEE II) Woody biomass for energy generation (2007) * 1 000 000 m rwe 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0 Armenia Liechtenstein Cyprus Ireland Serbia United Kingdom


  1. Draft presentation of results of the second Joint Wood Energy Enquiry (JWEE II)

  2. Woody biomass for energy generation (2007) * 1 000 000 m³ rwe 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0 Armenia Liechtenstein Cyprus Ireland Serbia United Kingdom Slovenia Slovakia Netherlands * m³ rwe: m³ roundwood equivalent Switzerland Austria Finland Sweden France Russian Federation Canada

  3. Woody biomass for energy generation (2007) User: Sources: 3%1% 2% 24% 43% 41% 53% 33% S1 Direct U1 Power and heat S2 Indirect U2 Industrial S3 Recovered U3 Residential S Unspecified U4 Other

  4. Data sources and qualities (2007)

  5. Data sources and qualities (2007) Total cells filled / table 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 T I: T II: T III: T IV:

  6. Data sources and qualities (2007) Share of filled cells / table 75% 50% 25% 0% T I: T II: T III: T IV:

  7. Data sources and qualities (2007) Data sources / table 75% O 50% A B C 25% D 0% T I: T II: T III: T IV: O Official national statistics A Excellent data quality (e.g. empirically, robust data from recent study (2006-2008)) Good data quality (e.g. older studies with widely recognized precision … or good expert B estimate -based on more than one source) C Rough estimate (about right order of magnitude), D No information on data quality available

  8. 2005 and 2007 Countries with replies

  9. Sources of woody biomass for energy * 1 000 000 m³ rwe 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 United Kingdom 2005 United Kingdom 2007 S1 Direct S2 Indirect S3 Recovered S4 Unspecified Slovenia 2005 Slovenia 2007 Netherlands 2005 Netherlands 2007 Switzerland 2005 Switzerland 2007 * 1 000 000 m³ rwe 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0 Austria 2005 Austria 2007 * m³ rwe: m³ roundwood equivalent Finland 2005 Finland 2007 Sweden 2005 Sweden 2007 France 2005 France 2007 Canada 2005 Canada 2007

  10. Sources of woody biomass for energy * 1 000 000 m³ rwe 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 United Kingdom 2005 United Kingdom 2007 U1 Power and heat U2 Industrial U3 Residential U4 Other Slovenia 2005 Slovenia 2007 Netherlands 2005 Netherlands 2007 Switzerland 2005 Switzerland 2007 * 1 000 000 m³ rwe 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0 Austria 2005 Austria 2007 * m³ rwe: m³ roundwood equivalent Finland 2005 Finland 2007 Sweden 2005 Sweden 2007 France 2005 France 2007 Canada 2005 Canada 2007

  11. 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 20% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% United Kingdom 2005 United Kingdom 2007 Role of woody biomass in totel primary energy supply TPES Netherlands 2005 Netherlands 2007 Switzerland 2005 Switzerland 2007 France 2005 France 2007 Canada 2005 (%) Canada 2007 Slovenia 2005 Slovenia 2007 Austria 2005 Austria 2007 Sweden 2005 Sweden 2007 Finland 2005 Finland 2007

  12. 100% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 0% United Kingdom 2005 United Kingdom 2007 Netherlands 2005 Role of woody biomass in renewable energy supply Netherlands 2007 Switzerland 2005 Switzerland 2007 France 2005 France 2007 RES (%) Canada 2005 Canada 2007 Slovenia 2005 Slovenia 2007 Austria 2005 Austria 2007 Sweden 2005 Sweden 2007 Finland 2005 Finland 2007

  13. Change in the share of wood energy in TPES & RES between 2005 and 2007 (%) 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% -5% S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E P R P R R P P R P R R P R P P R P R T T T T T T T T T m s a a a n d d e i m s d d e c a d a i a n d n e n r o n d n c n d i t e n a i d n a a o d n e r s n a d n a a a n t a l l e d e v g r s u n n a l a r e l l a w r e v o g r u A n n F i r a w l e e C F z o r F l S i n i A C S e h t F K z S l i i S K t h t w e i d t w S d e N e S N e t i t n i n U U

  14. Countries with 2007 replies

  15. * 1 000 m³ rwe Sources: 0 1 2 3 Ireland 2007 Serbia 2007 Slovakia 2007 * 1 000 000 m³ rwe 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0 Russian Federation 2007 * User: 1 000 000 m³ rwe * m³ rwe: m³ roundwood equivalent 0 1 2 3 Ireland 2007 Serbia 2007 Slovakia 2007 * 1 000 000 m³ rwe 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0 Russian Federation 2007

  16. Comprehensive national data sheet: (2007 & 2005 data)

  17. Wood energy indicators

  18. Wood energy indicators 4.0 Use of woody biomass for energy generation by residential users (m³/capita rural) 3.5 Direct wood removals for energy generation (m³/capita ) 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 United Kingdom Netherlands Slovakia Slovenia Austria Sweden Finland Cyprus Ireland Serbia Federation Switzerland France Russian

  19. Wood energy indicators 12 Direct woody biomass supply/ ha forest available for wood supply (m³/ha) Woody biomass used for energy per ha forest available 10 for wood supply (m³/ha) 8 6 4 2 0 Canada Kingdom Slovenia Slovakia Finland Sweden Austria Netherlands Federation Cyprus Ireland Serbia Switzerland France Russian United

  20. Wood energy indicators 70% Share of direct woody biomass removals from forests and outside forests for energy purposes (%) 60% Share of woody biomass for energy production in total domestic supply (including cascaded use) (%) 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% United Kingdom Ireland Canada Slovakia Federation Cyprus Sweden Finland Austria Slovenia Switzerland Serbia France Netherlands Russian

  21. Material & energy use – a question of fibre origin

  22. Material & energy use – a question of fibre origin Direct use of woody biomass from forests and outside forests* 24% 76% 46% 54% Energy use Material use Total use of woody biomass from any source available for wood fiber supply * without Russian Federation and Canada (including cascaded use and trade)** **without Russian Federation

  23. Conclusions & findings will be presented shortly

  24. Questions for discussion

  25. Delegates of the Working Party are invited to: • express their opinion on the JWEE process so far (structure / communication / timeline / improvements, etc.). • inform the Working Party about efforts to improve knowledge on wood energy at national level and whether JWEE had contributed to this process. • provide guidance on future of the JWEE (repeat exercise in two years).

Recommend


More recommend