Considerations for Moving from Bay Village I would not consider moving 27.2% For lower taxes 49.9% For a different climate 20.8% For a smaller house 15.1% For a retirement friendly community 13.1% For attached condos/clustered homes 12.6% For more home for my money 12.6% For a newer house 11.2% To be closer to family and/or friends 9.8% For a larger house 8.3% To be closer to work/job related 8.2% For better community facilities 8.2% For a more rural environment 7.1% To be able to walk places 6.7% To be closer to Downtown Cleveland 3.7% For a higher quality of municipal services 3.4% For a rental unit 2.3% For better access to shopping 1.8% For less traffic congestion 1.2% For a better school district 0.9% For a safer community 0.7% To have better access to highways 0.2% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% City Qualities
Considerations for Moving from Bay Village I would not consider moving 27.2% For lower taxes 49.9% For a different climate 20.8% For a smaller house 15.1% For a retirement friendly community 13.1% For attached condos/clustered homes 12.6% For more home for my money 12.6% For a newer house 11.2% To be closer to family and/or friends 9.8% For a larger house 8.3% To be closer to work/job related 8.2% For better community facilities 8.2% For a more rural environment 7.1% To be able to walk places 6.7% To be closer to Downtown Cleveland 3.7% For a higher quality of municipal services 3.4% For a rental unit 2.3% For better access to shopping 1.8% For less traffic congestion 1.2% For a better school district 0.9% For a safer community 0.7% To have better access to highways 0.2% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% City Qualities
Considerations for Moving from Bay Village 18 to 44 Year Olds 45 to 64 Year Olds 65+ Years Old For lower taxes (48.4%) For lower taxes (54.3%) For lower taxes (40.4%) • • • For a larger house For a different climate For a smaller house • • • (27.8%) (26.7%) (24.0%) For more home for my For a smaller house For retirement friendly • • • money (27.8%) (14.3%) community (19.1%) To be closer to For attached For attached • • • work/job related condos/clustered condos/clustered (18.3%) homes (13.6%) homes (16.9%) For a different climate For retirement friendly To be closer to • • • (18.3%) community (13.6%) family/friends (12.6%) City Qualities
Considerations for Moving from Bay Village 18 to 44 Year Olds 45 to 64 Year Olds 65+ Years Old For lower taxes (48.4%) For lower taxes (54.3%) For lower taxes (40.4%) • • • For a larger house For a different climate For a smaller house • • • (27.8%) (26.7%) (24.0%) For more home for my For a smaller house For retirement friendly • • • money (27.8%) (14.3%) community (19.1%) To be closer to For attached For attached • • • work/job related condos/clustered condos/clustered (18.3%) homes (13.6%) homes (16.9%) For a different climate For retirement friendly To be closer to • • • (18.3%) community (13.6%) family/friends (12.6%) City Qualities
Considerations for Moving from Bay Village 18 to 44 Year Olds 45 to 64 Year Olds 65+ Years Old For lower taxes (48.4%) For lower taxes (54.3%) For lower taxes (40.4%) • • • For a larger house For a different climate For a smaller house • • • (27.8%) (26.7%) (24.0%) For more home for my For a smaller house For retirement friendly • • • money (27.8%) (14.3%) community (19.1%) To be closer to For attached For attached • • • work/job related condos/clustered condos/clustered (18.3%) homes (13.6%) homes (16.9%) For a different climate For retirement friendly To be closer to • • • (18.3%) community (13.6%) family/friends (12.6%) City Qualities
Land Use
Opinions on Land Use Statements Environmentally friendly development is important 26.9% 49.9% 17.8% New homes should match existing design 25.3% 35.5% 22.8% 14.0% Maintain and attract retail/service stores 14.3% 37.2% 24.0% 18.8% Focus on mixed-use development 9.0% 35.1% 30.7% 17.4% 7.8% Allow more townhouses/condos 10.2% 33.2% 19.7% 23.2% 13.6% Major streets should have decorative elements 10.1% 32.1% 36.6% 17.7% Promote economic development 31.5% 22.7% 7.7% 7.4% 30.6% Allow more multi-family residential 11.1% 17.6% 39.9% 27.6% Grow its population 29.3% 48.6% 14.5% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Agree Neither Disagree Land Use
Opinions on Land Use Statements Environmentally friendly development is important 26.9% 49.9% 17.8% New homes should match existing design 25.3% 35.5% 22.8% 14.0% Maintain and attract retail/service stores 14.3% 37.2% 24.0% 18.8% Focus on mixed-use development 9.0% 35.1% 30.7% 17.4% 7.8% Allow more townhouses/condos 10.2% 33.2% 19.7% 23.2% 13.6% Major streets should have decorative elements 10.1% 32.1% 36.6% 17.7% Promote economic development 31.5% 22.7% 7.7% 7.4% 30.6% Allow more multi-family residential 11.1% 17.6% 39.9% 27.6% Grow its population 29.3% 48.6% 14.5% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Agree Neither Disagree Land Use
Opinions on Land Use Statements Environmentally friendly development is important 26.9% 49.9% 17.8% New homes should match existing design 25.3% 35.5% 22.8% 14.0% Maintain and attract retail/service stores 14.3% 37.2% 24.0% 18.8% Focus on mixed-use development 9.0% 35.1% 30.7% 17.4% 7.8% Allow more townhouses/condos 10.2% 33.2% 19.7% 23.2% 13.6% Major streets should have decorative elements 10.1% 32.1% 36.6% 17.7% Promote economic development 31.5% 22.7% 7.7% 7.4% 30.6% Allow more multi-family residential 11.1% 17.6% 39.9% 27.6% Grow its population 29.3% 48.6% 14.5% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Agree Neither Disagree Land Use
Opinions on Land Use Statements Environmentally friendly development is important 26.9% 49.9% 17.8% New homes should match existing design 25.3% 35.5% 22.8% 14.0% Maintain and attract retail/service stores 14.3% 37.2% 24.0% 18.8% Focus on mixed-use development 9.0% 35.1% 30.7% 17.4% 7.8% Allow more townhouses/condos 10.2% 33.2% 19.7% 23.2% 13.6% Major streets should have decorative elements 10.1% 32.1% 36.6% 17.7% Promote economic development 31.5% 22.7% 7.7% 7.4% 30.6% Allow more multi-family residential 11.1% 17.6% 39.9% 27.6% Grow its population 29.3% 48.6% 14.5% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Agree Neither Disagree Land Use
Opinions on Land Use Statements by Age 69.3% 62.1% 55.3% 50.6% 46.7% 46.6% 47.5% 27.1% 26.2% New homes should Major streets should The City should allow match the scale and have decorative elements more townhouses or design of existing homes (e.g., gateway signs, lamp posts) condos in appropriate locations 18 to 44 Years Old 45 to 64 Years Old Land Use
Opinions on Land Use Statements by Age 69.3% 62.1% 55.3% 50.6% 46.7% 46.6% 47.5% 27.1% 26.2% New homes should Major streets should The City should allow match the scale and have decorative elements more townhouses or design of existing homes (e.g., gateway signs, lamp posts) condos in appropriate locations 18 to 44 Years Old 45 to 64 Years Old Land Use
Community Events
Opinions on Community Events Lake Erie Nature & Science Center Night 46.2% 49.4% BAYarts Art Festival 34.8% 53.4% 11.1% BAYarts Farm + Art Market 33.0% 49.5% 13.8% BAYarts Moondance 38.7% 43.7% 14.7% Bay Library Programs 34.9% 46.6% 15.8% Annual May in Bay 5K 30.4% 49.8% 18.1% Touch-a-Truck 35.0% 45.1% 16.4% Summer Fun Night 25.6% 53.5% 17.7% Bay Days 29.2% 48.8% 18.5% Bay Village Community Christmas 27.0% 46.5% 23.7% Cahoon in June 29.6% 42.7% 23.3% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Good Average Poor Community Events
Opinions on Community Events Event Percent with “No Opinion” Touch-a-Truck 58.7% Annual May in Bay 5K 58.4% BAYarts Moondance 56.5% Bay Village Community Christmas 55.9% Summer Fun Night 53.4% Cahoon in June 53.3% BAYarts Farm + Art Market 32.0% Lake Erie Nature & Science Center Night 27.2% BAYarts Art Festival 25.5% Bay Library Programs 18.8% Bay Days 10.3% Community Events
Opinions on Community Events Event Percent with “No Opinion” Touch-a-Truck 58.7% Greater than 50% Annual May in Bay 5K 58.4% BAYarts Moondance 56.5% Bay Village Community Christmas 55.9% Summer Fun Night 53.4% Cahoon in June 53.3% BAYarts Farm + Art Market 32.0% Less than 35% Lake Erie Nature & Science Center Night 27.2% BAYarts Art Festival 25.5% Bay Library Programs 18.8% Bay Days 10.3% Community Events
Would you like to see additional events? Not Sure Yes 45.0% 43.2% No 11.8% Community Events
Would you like to see additional events? 64.1% 57.6% 52.5% 38.6% 36.8% 16.7% 18 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 to 74 75+ Community Events
Would you like to see additional events? 64.1% 57.6% 52.5% 38.6% 36.8% 16.7% 18 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 to 74 75+ Greater than 50% Less than 40% Community Events
Parks and Recreation
Opinions on Parks and Recreation Facilities Huntington Reservation (Cleveland Metroparks) 52.4% 40.0% Bay Village Family Aquatic Center 39.6% 47.0% 9.4% Cahoon Memorial Park 27.8% 53.4% 16.9% Bradley Park 21.8% 57.5% 19.0% Skate and Bike Park 17.0% 52.6% 21.4% Biking and Hiking Trails 20.3% 48.6% 22.6% 6.9% Dwyer Memorial Senior Center 15.4% 51.8% 28.6% Reese Park (Clague Road) 13.7% 49.3% 34.1% Columbia Park 11.3% 41.1% 36.8% 9.3% Community House 8.2% 37.0% 42.0% 12.5% Community Gym/Fitness Room 24.4% 28.9% 25.8% 15.3% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Good Average Poor Parks and Recreation
Opinions on Parks and Recreation Facilities Huntington Reservation (Cleveland Metroparks) 52.4% 40.0% Bay Village Family Aquatic Center 39.6% 47.0% 9.4% Cahoon Memorial Park 27.8% 53.4% 16.9% Bradley Park 21.8% 57.5% 19.0% Skate and Bike Park 17.0% 52.6% 21.4% Biking and Hiking Trails 20.3% 48.6% 22.6% 6.9% Dwyer Memorial Senior Center 15.4% 51.8% 28.6% Reese Park (Clague Road) 13.7% 49.3% 34.1% Columbia Park 11.3% 41.1% 36.8% 9.3% Community House 8.2% 37.0% 42.0% 12.5% Community Gym/Fitness Room 24.4% 28.9% 25.8% 15.3% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Good Average Poor Parks and Recreation
Opinions on Parks and Recreation Facilities Huntington Reservation (Cleveland Metroparks) 52.4% 40.0% Bay Village Family Aquatic Center 39.6% 47.0% 9.4% Cahoon Memorial Park 27.8% 53.4% 16.9% Bradley Park 21.8% 57.5% 19.0% Skate and Bike Park 17.0% 52.6% 21.4% Biking and Hiking Trails 20.3% 48.6% 22.6% 6.9% Dwyer Memorial Senior Center 15.4% 51.8% 28.6% Reese Park (Clague Road) 13.7% 49.3% 34.1% Columbia Park 11.3% 41.1% 36.8% 9.3% Community House 8.2% 37.0% 42.0% 12.5% Community Gym/Fitness Room 24.4% 28.9% 25.8% 15.3% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Good Average Poor Parks and Recreation
Opinions on Parks and Recreation Facilities Event Percent with “No Opinion” Dwyer Memorial Senior Center 49.4% Community Gym/Fitness Room 47.8% Skate and Bike Park 41.8% Community House 38.2% Columbia Park 30.0% Reese Park (Clague Road) 27.0% Bay Village Family Aquatic Center 25.7% Bradley Park 17.9% Biking and Hiking Trails 15.1% Cahoon Memorial Park 7.5% Huntington Reservation (Cleveland Metroparks) 2.8% Parks and Recreation
Opinions on Parks and Recreation Facilities Event Percent with “No Opinion” Dwyer Memorial Senior Center 49.4% Community Gym/Fitness Room 47.8% Skate and Bike Park 41.8% Community House 38.2% Columbia Park 30.0% Reese Park (Clague Road) 27.0% Bay Village Family Aquatic Center 25.7% Bradley Park 17.9% Biking and Hiking Trails 15.1% Cahoon Memorial Park 7.5% Huntington Reservation (Cleveland Metroparks) 2.8% Parks and Recreation
Ease of Access to Lake Erie Very Poor Poor 0.7% 5.4% Average 10.5% Excellent 41.8% Good 41.6% Parks and Recreation
Would you like to see a new green space constructed next to City Hall? Yes 29.1% Not Sure 45.8% No 25.1% Parks and Recreation
Overall Quality of Parks and Recreation Facilities Very Poor Poor 0.2% 0.5% Average Excellent 14.3% 27.3% Good 57.7% Parks and Recreation
Transportation
Opinions on Ease of Getting Around Car 72.3% 26.5% Walking 46.2% 43.3% 7.6% Bike 42.3% 44.5% 6.7% Senior Transportation 12.9% 24.2% 56.1% Public Transit 16.5% 32.9% 28.8% 17.1% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Agree Neither Disagree Transportation
Opinions on Ease of Getting Around Car 72.3% 26.5% Walking 46.2% 43.3% 7.6% Bike 42.3% 44.5% 6.7% Senior Transportation 12.9% 24.2% 56.1% Public Transit 16.5% 32.9% 28.8% 17.1% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Agree Neither Disagree Transportation
Priority for Improvements to Getting Around Bike 20.7% 30.3% 23.7% 10.6% 14.7% Walking 14.4% 26.1% 30.3% 11.6% 17.6% Senior Transportation 13.5% 24.5% 32.5% 10.0% 19.5% Public Transit 9.1% 18.2% 33.8% 17.2% 21.7% Car 9.1% 11.4% 26.6% 20.5% 32.5% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% High Average Low Transportation
Priority for Improvements to Getting Around Bike 20.7% 30.3% 23.7% 10.6% 14.7% Walking 14.4% 26.1% 30.3% 11.6% 17.6% Senior Transportation 13.5% 24.5% 32.5% 10.0% 19.5% Public Transit 9.1% 18.2% 33.8% 17.2% 21.7% Car 9.1% 11.4% 26.6% 20.5% 32.5% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% High Average Low Transportation
Priority for Improvements to Getting Around Bike 20.7% 30.3% 23.7% 10.6% 14.7% Walking 14.4% 26.1% 30.3% 11.6% 17.6% Senior Transportation 13.5% 24.5% 32.5% 10.0% 19.5% Public Transit 9.1% 18.2% 33.8% 17.2% 21.7% Car 9.1% 11.4% 26.6% 20.5% 32.5% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% High Average Low Transportation
Condition of the City’s Sidewalks Very Poor 0.5% Poor Excellent 9.8% 9.1% Average 35.6% Good 45.0% Transportation
City Services
Opinions on Quality of City Services Fire protection/EMS 59.0% 37.8% Police protection 53.2% 40.7% Park maintenance 32.7% 56.6% 9.7% Trash removal & curbside recycling 36.9% 49.3% 11.5% Compost and brush recycling 33.3% 49.5% 13.2% Leaf collection 35.1% 46.1% 14.2% Traffic enforcement 28.6% 48.1% 18.7% Recreational programs 20.8% 54.5% 21.7% Snow removal 24.4% 47.8% 22.6% Senior transportation services 16.7% 46.5% 25.4% 9.6% Street maintenance/repair 11.3% 42.7% 34.9% 7.9% Building department 11.9% 40.4% 37.9% 6.3% City of Bay Village website 10.6% 40.0% 41.8% Tree lawn planting 12.6% 35.0% 33.2% 13.8% Property maintenance enforcement 7.1% 37.9% 35.7% 14.0% Sidewalk correction program 8.3% 31.6% 38.6% 15.5% Water back up/sewer inspection 8.1% 24.0% 31.7% 20.1% 16.1% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Good Average Poor City Services
Opinions on Quality of City Services Fire protection/EMS 59.0% 37.8% Police protection 53.2% 40.7% Park maintenance 32.7% 56.6% 9.7% Trash removal & curbside recycling 36.9% 49.3% 11.5% Compost and brush recycling 33.3% 49.5% 13.2% Leaf collection 35.1% 46.1% 14.2% Traffic enforcement 28.6% 48.1% 18.7% Recreational programs 20.8% 54.5% 21.7% Snow removal 24.4% 47.8% 22.6% Senior transportation services 16.7% 46.5% 25.4% 9.6% Street maintenance/repair 11.3% 42.7% 34.9% 7.9% Building department 11.9% 40.4% 37.9% 6.3% City of Bay Village website 10.6% 40.0% 41.8% Tree lawn planting 12.6% 35.0% 33.2% 13.8% Property maintenance enforcement 7.1% 37.9% 35.7% 14.0% Sidewalk correction program 8.3% 31.6% 38.6% 15.5% Water back up/sewer inspection 8.1% 24.0% 31.7% 20.1% 16.1% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Good Average Poor City Services
Opinions on Quality of City Services Fire protection/EMS 59.0% 37.8% Police protection 53.2% 40.7% Park maintenance 32.7% 56.6% 9.7% Trash removal & curbside recycling 36.9% 49.3% 11.5% Compost and brush recycling 33.3% 49.5% 13.2% Leaf collection 35.1% 46.1% 14.2% Traffic enforcement 28.6% 48.1% 18.7% Recreational programs 20.8% 54.5% 21.7% Snow removal 24.4% 47.8% 22.6% Senior transportation services 16.7% 46.5% 25.4% 9.6% Street maintenance/repair 11.3% 42.7% 34.9% 7.9% Building department 11.9% 40.4% 37.9% 6.3% City of Bay Village website 10.6% 40.0% 41.8% Tree lawn planting 12.6% 35.0% 33.2% 13.8% Property maintenance enforcement 7.1% 37.9% 35.7% 14.0% Sidewalk correction program 8.3% 31.6% 38.6% 15.5% Water back up/sewer inspection 8.1% 24.0% 31.7% 20.1% 16.1% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Good Average Poor City Services
Opinions on Quality of City Services Fire protection/EMS 59.0% 37.8% Police protection 53.2% 40.7% Park maintenance 32.7% 56.6% 9.7% Trash removal & curbside recycling 36.9% 49.3% 11.5% Compost and brush recycling 33.3% 49.5% 13.2% Leaf collection 35.1% 46.1% 14.2% Traffic enforcement 28.6% 48.1% 18.7% Recreational programs 20.8% 54.5% 21.7% Snow removal 24.4% 47.8% 22.6% Senior transportation services 16.7% 46.5% 25.4% 9.6% Street maintenance/repair 11.3% 42.7% 34.9% 7.9% Building department 11.9% 40.4% 37.9% 6.3% City of Bay Village website 10.6% 40.0% 41.8% Tree lawn planting 12.6% 35.0% 33.2% 13.8% Property maintenance enforcement 7.1% 37.9% 35.7% 14.0% Sidewalk correction program 8.3% 31.6% 38.6% 15.5% Water back up/sewer inspection 8.1% 24.0% 31.7% 20.1% 16.1% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Good Average Poor City Services
Opinions on Quality of City Services Fire protection/EMS 59.0% 37.8% Police protection 53.2% 40.7% Park maintenance 32.7% 56.6% 9.7% Trash removal & curbside recycling 36.9% 49.3% 11.5% Compost and brush recycling 33.3% 49.5% 13.2% Leaf collection 35.1% 46.1% 14.2% Traffic enforcement 28.6% 48.1% 18.7% Recreational programs 20.8% 54.5% 21.7% Snow removal 24.4% 47.8% 22.6% Senior transportation services 16.7% 46.5% 25.4% 9.6% Street maintenance/repair 11.3% 42.7% 34.9% 7.9% Building department 11.9% 40.4% 37.9% 6.3% City of Bay Village website 10.6% 40.0% 41.8% Tree lawn planting 12.6% 35.0% 33.2% 13.8% Property maintenance enforcement 7.1% 37.9% 35.7% 14.0% Sidewalk correction program 8.3% 31.6% 38.6% 15.5% Water back up/sewer inspection 8.1% 24.0% 31.7% 20.1% 16.1% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Good Average Poor City Services
Opinions on Importance of City Services Fire protection/EMS 92.0% 7.5% Police protection 89.6% 9.4% Trash removal & curbside recycling 64.8% 33.4% Snow removal 75.5% 22.6% Street maintenance/repair 60.6% 37.5% Leaf collection 65.7% 31.3% Park maintenance 52.3% 44.5% Water back up/sewer inspection 66.8% 29.9% Compost and brush recycling 47.5% 43.6% 8.4% Recreational programs 37.8% 50.1% 10.0% Building department 27.4% 54.6% 15.7% Sidewalk correction program 28.5% 51.9% 17.9% Property maintenance enforcement 35.2% 44.9% 17.5% Traffic enforcement 34.0% 44.4% 19.0% Senior transportation services 26.5% 45.7% 19.5% 8.3% Tree lawn planting 19.2% 33.3% 34.7% 12.8% City of Bay Village website 11.6% 38.1% 36.0% 14.3% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Very Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important City Services
Opinions on Importance of City Services Fire protection/EMS 92.0% 7.5% Police protection 89.6% 9.4% Trash removal & curbside recycling 64.8% 33.4% Snow removal 75.5% 22.6% Street maintenance/repair 60.6% 37.5% Leaf collection 65.7% 31.3% Park maintenance 52.3% 44.5% Water back up/sewer inspection 66.8% 29.9% Compost and brush recycling 47.5% 43.6% 8.4% Recreational programs 37.8% 50.1% 10.0% Building department 27.4% 54.6% 15.7% Sidewalk correction program 28.5% 51.9% 17.9% Property maintenance enforcement 35.2% 44.9% 17.5% Traffic enforcement 34.0% 44.4% 19.0% Senior transportation services 26.5% 45.7% 19.5% 8.3% Tree lawn planting 19.2% 33.3% 34.7% 12.8% City of Bay Village website 11.6% 38.1% 36.0% 14.3% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Very Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important City Services
Opinions on Importance of City Services Fire protection/EMS 92.0% 7.5% Police protection 89.6% 9.4% Trash removal & curbside recycling 64.8% 33.4% Snow removal 75.5% 22.6% Street maintenance/repair 60.6% 37.5% Leaf collection 65.7% 31.3% Park maintenance 52.3% 44.5% Water back up/sewer inspection 66.8% 29.9% Compost and brush recycling 47.5% 43.6% 8.4% Recreational programs 37.8% 50.1% 10.0% Building department 27.4% 54.6% 15.7% Sidewalk correction program 28.5% 51.9% 17.9% Property maintenance enforcement 35.2% 44.9% 17.5% Traffic enforcement 34.0% 44.4% 19.0% Senior transportation services 26.5% 45.7% 19.5% 8.3% Tree lawn planting 19.2% 33.3% 34.7% 12.8% City of Bay Village website 11.6% 38.1% 36.0% 14.3% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Very Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important City Services
Matrix on Importance and Quality City Services
Matrix on Importance and Quality Increasing quality Increasing importance City Services
Matrix on Importance and Quality Average quality City Services
Matrix on Importance and Quality Average importance City Services
Matrix on Importance and Quality Above average quality, above average importance City Services
Matrix on Importance and Quality Below average quality, above average importance City Services
Matrix on Importance and Quality Below average quality, below average importance City Services
Matrix on Importance and Quality Above average quality, below average importance City Services
Overall Quality of City Services Very Poor Poor 0.2% 0.7% Average 7.9% Excellent 33.3% Good 57.9% City Services
Change in Overall Quality of City Services Greatly Greatly Declined Somewhat Improved 0.9% Declined 3.5% 10.7% Somewhat Improved 33.0% Stayed the Same 51.8% City Services
Housing
Priority for Types of Housing Maintain existing housing 55.4% 32.6% 10.3% More options for seniors 19.9% 28.2% 35.7% 8.7% 7.6% More single-family detached 14.5% 31.4% 35.2% 12.3% 6.6% More walkable options 9.1% 24.4% 40.5% 18.0% 8.0% More townhouses/condos 10.9% 20.9% 27.4% 20.1% 20.7% More options for young 21.1% 41.7% 20.2% 11.2% people More infill development 8.7% 17.5% 37.1% 20.3% 16.3% More apartments/mixed-use 8.8% 24.5% 25.6% 36.0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% High Average Low Housing
Priority for Types of Housing Maintain existing housing 55.4% 32.6% 10.3% More options for seniors 19.9% 28.2% 35.7% 8.7% 7.6% More single-family detached 14.5% 31.4% 35.2% 12.3% 6.6% More walkable options 9.1% 24.4% 40.5% 18.0% 8.0% More townhouses/condos 10.9% 20.9% 27.4% 20.1% 20.7% More options for young 21.1% 41.7% 20.2% 11.2% people More infill development 8.7% 17.5% 37.1% 20.3% 16.3% More apartments/mixed-use 8.8% 24.5% 25.6% 36.0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% High Average Low Housing
Priority for Types of Housing Maintain existing housing 55.4% 32.6% 10.3% More options for seniors 19.9% 28.2% 35.7% 8.7% 7.6% More single-family detached 14.5% 31.4% 35.2% 12.3% 6.6% More walkable options 9.1% 24.4% 40.5% 18.0% 8.0% More townhouses/condos 10.9% 20.9% 27.4% 20.1% 20.7% More options for young 21.1% 41.7% 20.2% 11.2% people More infill development 8.7% 17.5% 37.1% 20.3% 16.3% More apartments/mixed-use 8.8% 24.5% 25.6% 36.0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% High Average Low Housing
Priority for Types of Housing Maintain existing housing 55.4% 32.6% 10.3% More options for seniors 19.9% 28.2% 35.7% 8.7% 7.6% More single-family detached 14.5% 31.4% 35.2% 12.3% 6.6% More walkable options 9.1% 24.4% 40.5% 18.0% 8.0% More townhouses/condos 10.9% 20.9% 27.4% 20.1% 20.7% More options for young 21.1% 41.7% 20.2% 11.2% people More infill development 8.7% 17.5% 37.1% 20.3% 16.3% More apartments/mixed-use 8.8% 24.5% 25.6% 36.0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% High Average Low Housing
Priority for Types of Housing Maintain existing housing 55.4% 32.6% 10.3% More options for seniors 19.9% 28.2% 35.7% 8.7% 7.6% More single-family detached 14.5% 31.4% 35.2% 12.3% 6.6% More walkable options 9.1% 24.4% 40.5% 18.0% 8.0% More townhouses/condos 10.9% 20.9% 27.4% 20.1% 20.7% More options for young 21.1% 41.7% 20.2% 11.2% people More infill development 8.7% 17.5% 37.1% 20.3% 16.3% More apartments/mixed-use 8.8% 24.5% 25.6% 36.0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% High Average Low Housing
Priority for Types of Housing 70.6% 58.5% 46.2% 45.2% 38.0% 19.5% More housing options for More well-designed seniors looking to remain single-family, detached in the City homes 18 to 44 Years Old 45 to 64 Years Old Housing
Priority for Types of Housing 70.6% 58.5% 46.2% 45.2% 38.0% 19.5% More housing options for More well-designed seniors looking to remain single-family, detached in the City homes 18 to 44 Years Old 45 to 64 Years Old Housing
Priority for Types of Housing 17.3% 15.3% 38.4% 37.4% 35.3% 34.4% 25.6% 6.5% 16.3% More housing options More well-designed More well-designed within walking distance to townhouses/condos apartments/mixed-use amenities development 18 to 44 Years Old 45 to 64 Years Old Housing
Priority for Types of Housing 17.3% 15.3% 38.4% 37.4% 35.3% 34.4% 25.6% 6.5% 16.3% More housing options More well-designed More well-designed within walking distance to townhouses/condos apartments/mixed-use amenities development 18 to 44 Years Old 45 to 64 Years Old Housing
Recommend
More recommend
