disclosures conflicts
play

Disclosures/Conflicts There were no grants No Disclosures as - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

5/8/2014 Disclosures/Conflicts There were no grants No Disclosures as related to this talk There were no potential conflicts of interest. Introduction But Characterization of OCD in hallux valgus? Hallux valgus deformity


  1. 5/8/2014 Disclosures/Conflicts � There were no grants � No Disclosures as related to this talk � There were no potential conflicts of interest. Introduction But… � Characterization of OCD in hallux valgus? � Hallux valgus deformity common � Correlation of cartilage lesions to � (Bock et al. JBJS Br 2004, Roukis et al. JFAS 2005) patient symptoms/outcome? � 15-20% dissatisfaction rate after hallux valgus correction � Correlation of cartilage lesions to (Smith et al. FA 1984, Coughlin et al. JBJS Am 2007) � severity of deformity? � 1 st MTP joint lesions have been associated with hallux � Prospective evaluation lacking valgus deformities � (Bock 2004, Lui 2008, Roukis 2005) 1

  2. 5/8/2014 Goals Hypothesis � Detail articular erosion patterns � Lesion grade and surface area would correlate with radiographic � Evaluate if damage is associated with measures of deformity and deformity patient clinical outcomes � Prospectively evaluate effect on outcomes Materials/Methods • Inclusion: � Exclusion: • Isolated pain � Rheumatoid • Hallux valgus � Inflammatory arthropathy • Refractory to non-op � Traumatic origin � Revision � DM � neuropathy 2

  3. 5/8/2014 Methods: Radiographic Methods: Clinical Outcomes Outcomes VAS � � Traditional Walking tolerance � Angles: HVA, IMA, HVIP, � Subjective numbness � DMMA AOFAS � � Grading- Grading- International � Cartilage Repair Society � (Coughlin (JBJS scale Am 2003) Location � � (Roukis et al. JFAS 2005) Pearson’s correlation coaefficient, student t-test, Post hoc power analysis- 44 would provide 90% power Often these are below the “equator” Results and not actually seen during bunion surgery � 56 feet � 91% with lesions � At 24 months: � VAS 5 � 1, AOFAS 59 � 89 � HVA 24 � 9, IMA 14 � 5 � 1 reoperation to fusion *Mean area 50 mm2 *Avg grade 3 *80% were inferior > superior, medial > lateral *size/grade did not correlate w/age or differ by gender 3

  4. 5/8/2014 Hallux valgus As oppose to Hallux rigidus DORSAL 4

  5. 5/8/2014 lesion max grade/number of lesions vs. radiograph outcomes lesion max grade/number of lesions vs. lesion max grade/number of lesions vs. radiograph outcomes radiograph outcomes 5

  6. 5/8/2014 lesion area vs radiographic outcomes lesion area vs radiographic outcomes 6

  7. 5/8/2014 Conclusions Discussion � Roukis et al. (JFAS 2005) � Proposed map • OCD in Hallux Valgus are anterior/medial/inferior � 100% w/ lesions >50 yo • No Correlation � Realign in young – High prevalence? � Lui et al. (Arthroscopy 2008) – Pain Multifactorial? � Correlated HVA to prevalence of OCD of 1 st MTP – Evaluation sensitive enough? • Significance of these lesions is unknown � Doty et al. (FAI 2013) • fusion or chondral repair techniques needed? � Cadeveric study- ant/inf > superior lesions • Not poor prognostic factors � More zones, higher grade of lesions • Realignment procedures are not contra-indicated � Correlated grade/size to angular deformity Thank You 7

Recommend


More recommend