differential algebraic dynamic logic for keymaera x
play

Differential-Algebraic Dynamic Logic for KeYmaera X CPS Grand Prix - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jan 31, 2023 •177 likes •786 views

Differential-Algebraic Dynamic Logic for KeYmaera X CPS Grand Prix Benjamin Lim Yao Chong Lim School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University December 11, 2018 Benjamin Lim, Yao Chong Lim (SCS) dA L for KeYmaeraX December 11, 2018 1 /

  1. Differential-Algebraic Dynamic Logic for KeYmaera X CPS Grand Prix Benjamin Lim Yao Chong Lim School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University December 11, 2018 Benjamin Lim, Yao Chong Lim (SCS) dA L for KeYmaeraX December 11, 2018 1 / 19

  2. Motivation Imprecision is everywhere in actual Cyber-Physical systems... Benjamin Lim, Yao Chong Lim (SCS) dA L for KeYmaeraX December 11, 2018 2 / 19

  3. Motivation Imprecision is everywhere in actual Cyber-Physical systems... but how do we precisely model its semantics and prove guarantees? Benjamin Lim, Yao Chong Lim (SCS) dA L for KeYmaeraX December 11, 2018 2 / 19

  4. Differential-Algebraic Dynamic Logic (dA L ) { x ′ = v , v ′ = a & v ≥ 0 } � � x ≤ m → x ≤ m Benjamin Lim, Yao Chong Lim (SCS) dA L for KeYmaeraX December 11, 2018 3 / 19

  5. Differential-Algebraic Dynamic Logic (dA L ) { x ′ = v , v ′ = a & v ≥ 0 } � � x ≤ m → x ≤ m Benjamin Lim, Yao Chong Lim (SCS) dA L for KeYmaeraX December 11, 2018 3 / 19

  6. Differential-Algebraic Dynamic Logic (dA L ) � {∃ δ. ( x ′ = v , v ′ = a + δ & v ≥ 0 ∧ δ 2 ≤ | v | � x ≤ m → 100) } x ≤ m Benjamin Lim, Yao Chong Lim (SCS) dA L for KeYmaeraX December 11, 2018 3 / 19

  7. Differential-Algebraic Dynamic Logic (dA L ) dA L = d L + existentially quantified ODEs y . ( x ′ 1 = θ 1 , x ′ 2 = θ 2 , · · · , x ′ {∃ ¯ n = θ n & Q ) } Benjamin Lim, Yao Chong Lim (SCS) dA L for KeYmaeraX December 11, 2018 3 / 19

  8. dA L Example (Perturbed Circular Motion) x 2 + y 2 = 1 → { x ′ = − y , y ′ = x } x 2 + y 2 ≤ 1 � � Benjamin Lim, Yao Chong Lim (SCS) dA L for KeYmaeraX December 11, 2018 4 / 19

  9. dA L Example (Perturbed Circular Motion) x 2 + y 2 = 1 → {∃ e . ( x ′ = − y + e , y ′ = x & x · e ≤ 0) } x 2 + y 2 ≤ 1 � � Benjamin Lim, Yao Chong Lim (SCS) dA L for KeYmaeraX December 11, 2018 4 / 19

  10. Uniform Substitution (Abridged) [ x := e ] P ( x ) → P ( e ) Axiom Schema Benjamin Lim, Yao Chong Lim (SCS) dA L for KeYmaeraX December 11, 2018 5 / 19

  11. Uniform Substitution (Abridged) [ x := e ] P ( x ) → P ( e ) Axiom Schema [ x := x + x ][ y := 3] x > 0 → [ y := 3] x + x > 0 Benjamin Lim, Yao Chong Lim (SCS) dA L for KeYmaeraX December 11, 2018 5 / 19

  12. Uniform Substitution (Abridged) [ x := e ] P ( x ) → P ( e ) Axiom Schema [ x := x + x ][ y := 3] x > 0 → [ y := 3] x + x > 0 Valid instance! Benjamin Lim, Yao Chong Lim (SCS) dA L for KeYmaeraX December 11, 2018 5 / 19

  13. Uniform Substitution (Abridged) [ x := e ] P ( x ) → P ( e ) Axiom Schema [ x := x + x ][ y := 3] x > 0 → [ y := 3] x + x > 0 Valid instance! [ x := x + y ][ y := 3] x > 0 → [ y := 3] x + y > 0 Benjamin Lim, Yao Chong Lim (SCS) dA L for KeYmaeraX December 11, 2018 5 / 19

  14. Uniform Substitution (Abridged) [ x := e ] P ( x ) → P ( e ) Axiom Schema [ x := x + x ][ y := 3] x > 0 → [ y := 3] x + x > 0 Valid instance! [ x := x + y ][ y := 3] x > 0 → [ y := 3] x + y > 0 Invalid instance! Benjamin Lim, Yao Chong Lim (SCS) dA L for KeYmaeraX December 11, 2018 5 / 19

  15. Uniform Substitution (Abridged) [ x := e ] P ( x ) → P ( e ) Axiom Schema [ x := x + x ][ y := 3] x > 0 → [ y := 3] x + x > 0 Valid instance! [ x := x + y ][ y := 3] x > 0 → [ y := 3] x + y > 0 Invalid instance! Benjamin Lim, Yao Chong Lim (SCS) dA L for KeYmaeraX December 11, 2018 5 / 19

  16. Uniform Substitution (Abridged) [ x := e ] P ( x ) → P ( e ) Axiom Schema [ x := x + x ][ y := 3] x > 0 → [ y := 3] x + x > 0 Valid instance! [ x := x + y ][ y := 3] x > 0 → [ y := 3] x + y > 0 Invalid instance! Side conditions necessary... Benjamin Lim, Yao Chong Lim (SCS) dA L for KeYmaeraX December 11, 2018 5 / 19

  17. Uniform Substitution (Abridged) [ x := e ] P ( x ) → P ( e ) Axiom Schema [ x := x + x ][ y := 3] x > 0 → [ y := 3] x + x > 0 Valid instance! [ x := x + y ][ y := 3] x > 0 → [ y := 3] x + y > 0 Invalid instance! Side conditions necessary...but which ones? Benjamin Lim, Yao Chong Lim (SCS) dA L for KeYmaeraX December 11, 2018 5 / 19

  18. Uniform Substitution (Abridged) [ x := e ] P ( x ) → P ( e ) Axiom Schema [ x := x + x ][ y := 3] x > 0 → [ y := 3] x + x > 0 Valid instance! [ x := x + y ][ y := 3] x > 0 → [ y := 3] x + y > 0 Invalid instance! Side conditions necessary...but which ones? Key observation: Never bind a free variable that was free! Benjamin Lim, Yao Chong Lim (SCS) dA L for KeYmaeraX December 11, 2018 5 / 19

  19. Uniform Substitution (Abridged) Instead of schema each with their own unique side conditions... [ x := e ] P ( x ) → P ( e ) (+some set of side conditions) Benjamin Lim, Yao Chong Lim (SCS) dA L for KeYmaeraX December 11, 2018 6 / 19

  20. Uniform Substitution (Abridged) Instead of schema each with their own unique side conditions... [ x := e ] P ( x ) → P ( e ) (+some set of side conditions) You have substitution axioms (without side conditions)... [ x := c ()] p ( x ) → p ( c ()) Benjamin Lim, Yao Chong Lim (SCS) dA L for KeYmaeraX December 11, 2018 6 / 19

  21. Uniform Substitution (Abridged) Instead of schema each with their own unique side conditions... [ x := e ] P ( x ) → P ( e ) (+some set of side conditions) You have substitution axioms (without side conditions)... [ x := c ()] p ( x ) → p ( c ()) and generic admissibility rules for each logical construct (checked recursively) preventing capture of free variables. Benjamin Lim, Yao Chong Lim (SCS) dA L for KeYmaeraX December 11, 2018 6 / 19

  22. Uniform Substitution (Abridged) Upshot: A significantly reduced soundness-critical core that is easier to maintain and understand Benjamin Lim, Yao Chong Lim (SCS) dA L for KeYmaeraX December 11, 2018 7 / 19

  23. Plan of Attack Modernize dA L , providing a uniform substitution calculus for it similar to that for d L . Benjamin Lim, Yao Chong Lim (SCS) dA L for KeYmaeraX December 11, 2018 8 / 19

  24. Plan of Attack Modernize dA L , providing a uniform substitution calculus for it similar to that for d L . Implement uniform substitution axioms into KeYmaeraX. Benjamin Lim, Yao Chong Lim (SCS) dA L for KeYmaeraX December 11, 2018 8 / 19

  25. Plan of Attack Modernize dA L , providing a uniform substitution calculus for it similar to that for d L . Implement uniform substitution axioms into KeYmaeraX. Implement derived axioms and tactics into KeYmaeraX. Benjamin Lim, Yao Chong Lim (SCS) dA L for KeYmaeraX December 11, 2018 8 / 19

  26. Plan of Attack Modernize dA L , providing a uniform substitution calculus for it similar to that for d L . Implement uniform substitution axioms into KeYmaeraX. Implement derived axioms and tactics into KeYmaeraX. Prove stuff! Benjamin Lim, Yao Chong Lim (SCS) dA L for KeYmaeraX December 11, 2018 8 / 19

  27. d L Recap DW [ c & q (¯ x )] p (¯ x ) ↔ [ c & q (¯ x )]( q (¯ x ) → p (¯ x )) DC ([ c & q (¯ x )] p (¯ x ) ↔ [ c & q (¯ x ) ∧ r (¯ x )] p (¯ x )) ← [ c & q (¯ x )] r (¯ x ) [ x ′ = f (¯ x ) ↔ [ x ′ = f (¯ x )][ x ′ := f (¯ DE x ) , c & q (¯ x )] p (¯ x ) , c & q (¯ x )] p (¯ x ) x )) ′ DI ([ c & q (¯ x )] p (¯ x ) ↔ [? q (¯ x )] p (¯ x )) ← [ c & q (¯ x )]( p (¯ Benjamin Lim, Yao Chong Lim (SCS) dA L for KeYmaeraX December 11, 2018 9 / 19

  28. d L Recap DW [ c & q (¯ x )] p (¯ x ) ↔ [ c & q (¯ x )]( q (¯ x ) → p (¯ x )) DC ([ c & q (¯ x )] p (¯ x ) ↔ [ c & q (¯ x ) ∧ r (¯ x )] p (¯ x )) ← [ c & q (¯ x )] r (¯ x ) [ x ′ = f (¯ x ) ↔ [ x ′ = f (¯ x )][ x ′ := f (¯ DE x ) , c & q (¯ x )] p (¯ x ) , c & q (¯ x )] p (¯ x ) x )) ′ DI ([ c & q (¯ x )] p (¯ x ) ↔ [? q (¯ x )] p (¯ x )) ← [ c & q (¯ x )]( p (¯ Benjamin Lim, Yao Chong Lim (SCS) dA L for KeYmaeraX December 11, 2018 9 / 19

  29. d L Recap DW [ c & q (¯ x )] p (¯ x ) ↔ [ c & q (¯ x )]( q (¯ x ) → p (¯ x )) DC ([ c & q (¯ x )] p (¯ x ) ↔ [ c & q (¯ x ) ∧ r (¯ x )] p (¯ x )) ← [ c & q (¯ x )] r (¯ x ) [ x ′ = f (¯ x ) ↔ [ x ′ = f (¯ x )][ x ′ := f (¯ DE x ) , c & q (¯ x )] p (¯ x ) , c & q (¯ x )] p (¯ x ) x )) ′ DI ([ c & q (¯ x )] p (¯ x ) ↔ [? q (¯ x )] p (¯ x )) ← [ c & q (¯ x )]( p (¯ Benjamin Lim, Yao Chong Lim (SCS) dA L for KeYmaeraX December 11, 2018 9 / 19

  30. d L Recap DW [ c & q (¯ x )] p (¯ x ) ↔ [ c & q (¯ x )]( q (¯ x ) → p (¯ x )) DC ([ c & q (¯ x )] p (¯ x ) ↔ [ c & q (¯ x ) ∧ r (¯ x )] p (¯ x )) ← [ c & q (¯ x )] r (¯ x ) [ x ′ = f (¯ x ) ↔ [ x ′ = f (¯ x )][ x ′ := f (¯ DE x ) , c & q (¯ x )] p (¯ x ) , c & q (¯ x )] p (¯ x ) DI ([ c & q (¯ x )] p (¯ x ) ↔ [? q (¯ x )] p (¯ x )) ← [ c & q (¯ x )]( p (¯ x )) ′ Benjamin Lim, Yao Chong Lim (SCS) dA L for KeYmaeraX December 11, 2018 9 / 19

Recommend

A Logic of Proofs for Differential Dynamic Logic Toward Independently Checkable Proof Certificates

A Logic of Proofs for Differential Dynamic Logic Toward Independently Checkable Proof Certificates

A Logic of Proofs for Differential Dynamic Logic Toward Independently Checkable Proof Certificates for Differential Dynamic Logic Nathan Fulton Andr` e Platzer Carnegie Mellon University CPP16 January 19, 2016 1 Motivation Strong

383 views • 37 slides
Differential Dynamic Logic and Differential Invariants for Hybrid Systems Andr e Platzer

Differential Dynamic Logic and Differential Invariants for Hybrid Systems Andr e Platzer

Differential Dynamic Logic and Differential Invariants for Hybrid Systems Andr e Platzer aplatzer@cs.cmu.edu Computer Science Department Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA http://symbolaris.com/ 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 1.0 0.1 0.8

1.69k views • 164 slides
A Uniform Substitution Calculus for Differential Dynamic Logic Andr e Platzer

A Uniform Substitution Calculus for Differential Dynamic Logic Andr e Platzer

A Uniform Substitution Calculus for Differential Dynamic Logic Andr e Platzer aplatzer@cs.cmu.edu Computer Science Department Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA The Secret for Simpler Sound Hybrid Systems Provers 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2

914 views • 77 slides
Formally Verified Differential Dynamic Logic (in Isabelle/HOL and Coq) Brandon Bohrer ,

Formally Verified Differential Dynamic Logic (in Isabelle/HOL and Coq) Brandon Bohrer ,

Formally Verified Differential Dynamic Logic (in Isabelle/HOL and Coq) Brandon Bohrer , Vincent Rahli, Ivana Vukotic, Marcus Vlp, Andr Platzer Thanks to: Johannes Hlzl, Fabian Immler, Tobias Nipkow, et. al. + Coquelicot team

540 views • 38 slides
(Belief) Dynamic Doxastic Differential Dynamic Logic (d4L) for Belief-Aware Cyber Physical

(Belief) Dynamic Doxastic Differential Dynamic Logic (d4L) for Belief-Aware Cyber Physical

(Belief) Dynamic Doxastic Differential Dynamic Logic (d4L) for Belief-Aware Cyber Physical Systems Joo G. Martins 1,2 , Andr Platzer 2 , Joo Leite 1 1 2 1 Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) Continuous movement Discrete control 2

971 views • 47 slides
Dynamic Process Models Moritz Diehl Overview Ordinary Differential Equations (ODE)

Dynamic Process Models Moritz Diehl Overview Ordinary Differential Equations (ODE)

Dynamic Process Models Moritz Diehl Overview Ordinary Differential Equations (ODE) Boundary Conditions, Objective Differential-Algebraic Equations (DAE) Multi Stage Processes Partial Differential Equations (PDE) and Method of

265 views • 22 slides
Quantified Differential Dynamic Logic for Distributed Hybrid Systems Andr e Platzer Carnegie

Quantified Differential Dynamic Logic for Distributed Hybrid Systems Andr e Platzer Carnegie

Quantified Differential Dynamic Logic for Distributed Hybrid Systems Andr e Platzer Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 1.0 0.1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Andr e Platzer (CMU) Quantified Differential Dynamic Logic

1.38k views • 88 slides
d L : Definite Descriptions in Differential Dynamic Logic Brandon Bohrer , Manuel Fern

d L : Definite Descriptions in Differential Dynamic Logic Brandon Bohrer , Manuel Fern

d L : Definite Descriptions in Differential Dynamic Logic Brandon Bohrer , Manuel Fern andez, and Andr e Platzer Logical Systems Lab Computer Science Department Carnegie Mellon University CADE-27 August 29 2019 1 / 22 Outline 1

778 views • 43 slides
dTL 2 : Differential Temporal Dynamic Logic with Nested Modalities for Hybrid Systems

dTL 2 : Differential Temporal Dynamic Logic with Nested Modalities for Hybrid Systems

dTL 2 : Differential Temporal Dynamic Logic with Nested Modalities for Hybrid Systems Jean-Baptiste Jeannin and Andr Platzer Carnegie Mellon University IJCAR, July 21 st , 2014 Jeannin & Platzer dTL 2 :

477 views • 33 slides
Switched Differential Algebraic Equations: Solution Theory, Lyapunov Functions, and Stability

Switched Differential Algebraic Equations: Solution Theory, Lyapunov Functions, and Stability

Switched Differential Algebraic Equations: Solution Theory, Lyapunov Functions, and Stability Stephan Trenn (joint work with Daniel Liberzon) Institute for Mathematics, University of W urzburg, Germany Workshop on Hybrid Dynamic Systems,

202 views • 19 slides
Nonsmooth Differential- Algebraic Equations Paul I. Barton Process Systems Engineering

Nonsmooth Differential- Algebraic Equations Paul I. Barton Process Systems Engineering

Nonsmooth Differential- Algebraic Equations Paul I. Barton Process Systems Engineering Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology Dynamic Modeling Frameworks in PSE Trade-off: applicability vs. ease of modeling & solving Hybrid

608 views • 36 slides
Logic & Proofs for Cyber-Physical Systems with KeYmaera X Andr e Platzer 0.5 0.4 0.3

Logic & Proofs for Cyber-Physical Systems with KeYmaera X Andr e Platzer 0.5 0.4 0.3

Logic & Proofs for Cyber-Physical Systems with KeYmaera X Andr e Platzer 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 1.0 0.1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Andr e Platzer (CMU) Logic & Proofs for Cyber-Physical Systems with KeYmaera X iFM17 1 / 29 Outline

1.38k views • 90 slides
Differential Dynamic Logic for Verifying Parametric Hybrid Systems e Platzer 1 , 2 Andr 1

Differential Dynamic Logic for Verifying Parametric Hybrid Systems e Platzer 1 , 2 Andr 1

Differential Dynamic Logic for Verifying Parametric Hybrid Systems e Platzer 1 , 2 Andr 1 University of Oldenburg, Department of Computing Science, Germany 2 Carnegie Mellon University, Computer Science Department, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

888 views • 76 slides
Differential Dynamic Logic for Hybrid Systems e Platzer 1 , 2 Andr 1 University of Oldenburg,

Differential Dynamic Logic for Hybrid Systems e Platzer 1 , 2 Andr 1 University of Oldenburg,

Differential Dynamic Logic for Hybrid Systems e Platzer 1 , 2 Andr 1 University of Oldenburg, Department of Computing Science, Germany 2 Carnegie Mellon University, Computer Science Department, Pittsburgh, PA, USA KeY07 Andr e Platzer

999 views • 70 slides
differential schemes and differential algebraic varieties Dmitry Trushin Department of

differential schemes and differential algebraic varieties Dmitry Trushin Department of

differential schemes and differential algebraic varieties Dmitry Trushin Department of Mechanics and Mathematics Moscow State University October 2010 Dmitry Trushin () Differential schemes October, 2010 1 / 21 Contents The differential

894 views • 63 slides
Algebraic Logic Applied to Relevance Logic: From De Morgan Monoids to Generalized Galois Logics

Algebraic Logic Applied to Relevance Logic: From De Morgan Monoids to Generalized Galois Logics

Algebraic Logic Applied to Relevance Logic: From De Morgan Monoids to Generalized Galois Logics J. Michael Dunn School of Informatics and Computing, and Department of Philosophy Indiana University Bloomington Special Section on Algebraic

487 views • 38 slides
Lambdas, Vectors, and Dynamic Logic Develop: a vector semantics and a dynamic logic for

Lambdas, Vectors, and Dynamic Logic Develop: a vector semantics and a dynamic logic for

Lambdas, Vectors, and Dynamic Logic Develop: a vector semantics and a dynamic logic for lambda calculus models of language Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Queen Mary University of London Joint work with Reinhard Muskens (Tilburg) Supported by Royal

1.08k views • 94 slides
Validated Simulation of Differential Algebraic Equations Julien Alexandre dit Sandretto

Validated Simulation of Differential Algebraic Equations Julien Alexandre dit Sandretto

Validated Simulation of Differential Algebraic Equations Julien Alexandre dit Sandretto Alexandre Chapoutot Department U2IS Ensta ParisTech SWIM 2015-Praha Guaranteed simulation of differential equations Recall of Ordinary differential

345 views • 30 slides
Improving KeYmaera Less clicking, more proving Motivation & Initial Idea improve the

Improving KeYmaera Less clicking, more proving Motivation & Initial Idea improve the

Improving KeYmaera Less clicking, more proving Motivation & Initial Idea improve the user-KeYmaera experience implement convenience features in KeYmaera reduce the amount of clicking Changes from initial idea moved over

291 views • 14 slides
Stochastic Differential Dynamic Logic for Stochastic Hybrid Systems Andr e Platzer Logical

Stochastic Differential Dynamic Logic for Stochastic Hybrid Systems Andr e Platzer Logical

Stochastic Differential Dynamic Logic for Stochastic Hybrid Systems Andr e Platzer Logical Systems Lab Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 1.0 0.1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Andr e Platzer (CMU) Stochastic

849 views • 83 slides
A geometric model of twisted differential K -theory Byungdo Park CUNY Algebraic Topology Seminar

A geometric model of twisted differential K -theory Byungdo Park CUNY Algebraic Topology Seminar

A geometric model of twisted differential K -theory Byungdo Park CUNY Algebraic Topology Seminar Princeton University 16th February 2017 Outline Overview of Differential K -theory Generalized cohomology theories and spectra Differential

1.28k views • 38 slides
b b b b b b b b b Geometric Singularities of Algebraic Differential Equations Werner M.

b b b b b b b b b Geometric Singularities of Algebraic Differential Equations Werner M.

b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b Geometric Singularities of Algebraic Differential Equations Werner M. Seiler ur Mathematik, Universit Institut f at Kassel (joint work with Markus Lange-Hegermann , RWTH Aachen) W.M.

677 views • 39 slides
UMBC A B M A L T F O U M B C I M Y O R T 1 (Nov. 19, 2001) I E S R C E O

UMBC A B M A L T F O U M B C I M Y O R T 1 (Nov. 19, 2001) I E S R C E O

Advanced VLSI Design Combination Logic Design IV CMSC 613 Dynamic Logic Dynamic logic reduces the fan-in, similar to pseudo-NMOS, without the static power consumption. M p Out A B C M p = + Out A In 1 C In 2 B PDN In 3

490 views • 21 slides
Combining equilibrium logic and dynamic logic (an introduction and a very brief overview) Luis

Combining equilibrium logic and dynamic logic (an introduction and a very brief overview) Luis

Introduction HT logic and equilibrium logic A dynamic extension of HT logic and of equilibrium logic DL-PA: dynamic logic of propositional Combining equilibrium logic and dynamic logic (an introduction and a very brief overview) Luis Farias

637 views • 31 slides

More recommend