Critical points of the multiplier map Igors Gorbovickis Jacobs University Bremen March 25, 2019 Igors Gorbovickis Critical points of the multiplier map
Independence of multipliers Theorem (G. 2014): The multipliers of any n − 1 distinct periodic orbits, considered as algebraic maps on the space of degree n polynomials, are locally independent at a generic polynomial f . Igors Gorbovickis Critical points of the multiplier map
The multiplier map on the space Poly 2 = { z 2 + c | c ∈ C } For any k ∈ N , ◮ let Poly k 2 be the set of all pairs ( f c , O ), such that f c ∈ Poly 2 and O is a periodic orbit of f c of period k . ◮ The multiplier map ρ k : Poly k 2 → C is defined by ρ k ( f c , O ) := the multiplier of the periodic orbit O . Question: What can we say about the critical points of the maps ρ k ? Igors Gorbovickis Critical points of the multiplier map
The multiplier map on the space Poly 2 = { z 2 + c | c ∈ C } For any k ∈ N , ◮ let Poly k 2 be the set of all pairs ( f c , O ), such that f c ∈ Poly 2 and O is a periodic orbit of f c of period k . ◮ The multiplier map ρ k : Poly k 2 → C is defined by ρ k ( f c , O ) := the multiplier of the periodic orbit O . Question: What can we say about the critical points of the maps ρ k ? When c = 0, k − 1 d ρ k z − 2 j +1 � dc (0 , � z 0 � ) = − 2 k . 0 j =0 6 12 18 20 21 24 30 k e 2 π i / 9 e 2 π i / 45 e 2 π i / 27 e 2 π i / 25 e 2 π i / 49 e 2 π i / 153 e 2 π i / 99 z 0 Table: The list of all k ≤ 30, for which ρ k has a critical point at c = 0. ( z 0 is a corresponding periodic point.) Igors Gorbovickis Critical points of the multiplier map
Critical points of the multiplier maps ρ k For any k ∈ N , define ◮ σ k ( f c , O ) := d ρ k dc ( f c , O ); ◮ X k := { c ∈ C | σ k ( f c , O ) = 0 , for some periodic orbit O} . (Points in X k are counted with multiplicity.) 1 � ν k := δ c . # X k c ∈ X k Theorem (Firsova, G.): The sequence of measures { ν k } k ∈ N converges to µ bif in the weak sense of measures on C . Theorem (Firsova, G.): For every k 0 ∈ N and c ∈ X k 0 \ M , there exists a sequence { c k } ∞ k =3 , such that each c k ∈ X k and k →∞ c k = c . lim Igors Gorbovickis Critical points of the multiplier map
Related results for quadratic polynomials µ bif = ∆ G M , where G M : C → [0 , + ∞ ) is the Green’s function of the Mandelbrot set and ∆ is the generalized Laplacian. n → + ∞ max { 2 − n log | f ◦ n G c ( z ) = lim c ( z ) | , 0 } , G M ( c ) = G c ( c ) . Igors Gorbovickis Critical points of the multiplier map
Related results for quadratic polynomials µ bif = ∆ G M , where G M : C → [0 , + ∞ ) is the Green’s function of the Mandelbrot set and ∆ is the generalized Laplacian. n → + ∞ max { 2 − n log | f ◦ n G c ( z ) = lim c ( z ) | , 0 } , G M ( c ) = G c ( c ) . Theorem (Brolin 1965): For any z 0 ∈ C (possibly avoiding two exceptional values), the points f − k ( z 0 ) (counted with multiplicity) c equidistribute on the Julia set J c , as k → ∞ . Theorem (Levin 1989, Bassanelli-Berteloot 2011, Buff-Gauthier 2015): For any ρ 0 ∈ C , the set of parameters c (counted with multiplicity), such that ρ k ( f c , O ) = ρ 0 , for some ( f c , O ) ∈ P k , equidistributes on the boundary of M , as k → ∞ . Igors Gorbovickis Critical points of the multiplier map
Critical points of the multiplier maps ρ k For any s ∈ C and any k ∈ N , ◮ define X s , k := { c ∈ C | σ ( f c , O ) = s , for some periodic orbit O} . (Points in X s , k are counted with multiplicity.) 1 � ν s , k := δ c . # X s , k c ∈ X s , k Theorem (Firsova, G.): For every sequence of complex numbers { s k } k ∈ N , such that 1 lim sup k log | s k | ≤ log 2 , k → + ∞ the sequence of measures { ν s k , k } k ∈ N converges to µ bif in the weak sense of measures on C . Igors Gorbovickis Critical points of the multiplier map
Idea of the proof: Potentials! Step 1: For each measure ν k , construct a potential (a subharmonic function) u k : C → [ −∞ , + ∞ ), such that ∆ u k = ν k . Step 2: Then convergence u k → G M in L 1 loc as k → ∞ implies weak convergence of measures ν k → µ bif . Igors Gorbovickis Critical points of the multiplier map
Step 1: Potentials ˜ � S k ( c , s ) := ( s − σ k ( f c , O )) O| ( c , O ) ∈ P k ˜ S k is a rational map in c with simple poles at primitive parabolic c . � C k ( c ) := ( c − ˜ c ) . c ∈ ˜ ˜ P k S k ( c , s ) = C k ( c ) ˜ S k ( c , s ) – polynomials in c and s . Lemma: S k ( c , 0) = 0, iff c is a critical point of the multiplier map ρ k . Igors Gorbovickis Critical points of the multiplier map
Step 1: Potentials ˜ � S k ( c , s ) := ( s − σ k ( f c , O )) O| ( c , O ) ∈ P k ˜ S k is a rational map in c with simple poles at primitive parabolic c . � C k ( c ) := ( c − ˜ c ) . c ∈ ˜ ˜ P k S k ( c , s ) = C k ( c ) ˜ S k ( c , s ) – polynomials in c and s . Lemma: S k ( c , 0) = 0, iff c is a critical point of the multiplier map ρ k . For all c ∈ C , define 1 1 � � log | ˜ u k ( c ) := log | S k ( c , 0) | = S k ( c , 0) | + log | C k ( c ) | . deg c S k deg c S k Then ν k = ∆ u k . Igors Gorbovickis Critical points of the multiplier map
Step 2: L 1 loc convergence of potentials Lemma (Buff, Gauthier): Any subharmonic function u : C → [ −∞ , + ∞ ) which coincides with G M outside M , coincides with G M everywhere. Lemma (Buff, Gauthier): Let K ⊂ C be a compact set such that C \ K is connected. Let v be a subharmonic function on C such that ∆ v is supported on ∂ K and does not charge the boundary of the connected components of the interior of K . Then, any subharmonic function u on C which coincides with v outside K , coincides with v everywhere. Igors Gorbovickis Critical points of the multiplier map
Step 2: L 1 loc convergence of potentials Lemma (Buff, Gauthier): Any subharmonic function u : C → [ −∞ , + ∞ ) which coincides with G M outside M , coincides with G M everywhere. Lemma (Buff, Gauthier): Let K ⊂ C be a compact set such that C \ K is connected. Let v be a subharmonic function on C such that ∆ v is supported on ∂ K and does not charge the boundary of the connected components of the interior of K . Then, any subharmonic function u on C which coincides with v outside K , coincides with v everywhere. Corollary: We need to prove u k → G M only outside M . Igors Gorbovickis Critical points of the multiplier map
Roots of the multiplier maps c ( λ ) := φ − 1 M ( λ 2 ) c : C \ D → C \ M – conformal double covering, Ω := { 0 , 1 } N , σ : Ω → Ω is the left shift. Igors Gorbovickis Critical points of the multiplier map
Roots of the multiplier maps c ( λ ) := φ − 1 M ( λ 2 ) c : C \ D → C \ M – conformal double covering, Ω := { 0 , 1 } N , σ : Ω → Ω is the left shift. For any λ ∈ C \ D , the map ψ λ : Ω → C is ◮ a homeomorphism between Ω and J c ( λ ) , conjugating σ to f c ( λ ) : ψ λ ◦ σ = f c ( λ ) ◦ ψ λ ; (1) ◮ ψ λ ( w ) depends analytically on λ ∈ C \ D ; Igors Gorbovickis Critical points of the multiplier map
Roots of the multiplier maps c ( λ ) := φ − 1 M ( λ 2 ) c : C \ D → C \ M – conformal double covering, Ω := { 0 , 1 } N , σ : Ω → Ω is the left shift. For any λ ∈ C \ D , the map ψ λ : Ω → C is ◮ a homeomorphism between Ω and J c ( λ ) , conjugating σ to f c ( λ ) : ψ λ ◦ σ = f c ( λ ) ◦ ψ λ ; (1) ◮ ψ λ ( w ) depends analytically on λ ∈ C \ D ; For λ ∈ C \ D , define 1 / k k − 1 � 2 k ψ λ ( σ j w ) g k , w ( λ ) := . j =0 Motivation: If w is k -periodic, then g k , w ( λ ) is the k -th degree root of the multiplier. Igors Gorbovickis Critical points of the multiplier map
Roots of the multiplier maps Ergodic Theorem: For a.e. w ∈ Ω, the sequence of maps { g k , w } k ∈ N converges to 2 λ on compact subsets of C \ D , as k → ∞ . Igors Gorbovickis Critical points of the multiplier map
Roots of the multiplier maps Ergodic Theorem: For a.e. w ∈ Ω, the sequence of maps { g k , w } k ∈ N converges to 2 λ on compact subsets of C \ D , as k → ∞ . Ω k ⊂ Ω – periodic itineraries of period k . For any w ∈ Ω k , define g w ( λ ) := g k , w ( λ ) – the k -th degree root of the multiplier. Theorem: For any ε, δ > 0 and a compact subset K ⊂ C \ D , there exists k 0 ∈ N , such that for any k ≥ k 0 , the following holds: # { w ∈ Ω k : � g w − 2 · id � K < δ } > 1 − ε. #Ω k Igors Gorbovickis Critical points of the multiplier map
Potentials outside of M 1 � � log | ˜ Recall: u k ( c ) := S k ( c , 0) | + log | C k ( c ) | . deg c S k According to Buff-Gauthier, for any c ∈ C \ M , 1 log | C k ( c ) | → log | λ ( c ) | , pointwise as k → ∞ . deg c S k Next � � 1 S k ( c , 0) | ∼ 1 1 d log | ˜ � � dc ([ g w ( λ )] k ) � k · log � = � � deg c S k 2 k � w ∈ Ω k 1 1 � � � � d λ � log k + ( k − 1) log | g w ( λ ) | + log | g ′ � � w ( λ ) | + log → � � 2 k k dc � � w ∈ Ω k → log | g w ( λ ) | (for “nice” w ) = log | 2 λ | = log | λ ( c ) | + log 2 . Igors Gorbovickis Critical points of the multiplier map
Recommend
More recommend