CORE F UNDI NG RE PORT CYCL E 24 F UNDI NG CYCL E 30 L - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CORE F UNDI NG RE PORT

CYCL E 24 F UNDI NG CYCL E

30 L OI L OI Applic a- Gr ants 25 Submit- Ac c e pt- tions (suc c e ss Gra nts 20 te d e d r ate ) 15 (suc c e ss Unfunde d r ate ) 10 Applic a tio ns 5 I DE As 28 19 (68%) 17 6 (35%) L OI s no 0 T ra nsla tio 11 4 (36%) 3 0 (0%) sub missio n na l De c line d L OI s CRC Pilo t 10 3 (30%) CRC F ull 5 2 (40%) CYCL E 24 F UNDI NG SUCCE SS

Awa rd T ype b y Do lla rs Awa rd T ype b y numb e rs Community Re se ar c h Collabor atio n - F ull, 2, 18% IDE A, Community $1,281,661, Re se ar c h 36% Collabor ati on - F ull, Community $1,712,896, IDE A, 6, 55% Re se ar c h 48% Collabor atio Community n - Pilot, 3, Re se ar c h 27% Collabor ati on - Pilot, $574,051, 16% CYCL E 24 F UNDI NG DE CI SI ONS

Prio rity I ssue b y Do lla rs Prio rity I ssue b y Numb e rs Biolog y Biolog y of Community of the Communi the Bre a st Impa c t of Bre a st ty Impa c t Ce ll, Bre a st of Bre a st Ce ll, 1, $288,000, Ca nc e r, E tiolog y 9% Ca nc e r, 8% $354,051, a nd 2, 18% 10% Pre ve ntio n, 3, 27% E tiolog y De te c tion/ P a nd rog nosis/ T r Pre ve ntion, e a tme nt, De te c tion $1,932,896, $993,661, / Prog nosi 54% 28% s/ T re a tme nt, 5, 46% CYCL E 24 F UNDI NG DE CI SI ONS

I nstitutio ns b y Do lla rs Ca rrie 's Bre a st Ca nc e r Ce da rs- Sina i Clinic a de USC, $165,000, T OUCH Ove r T ime , Me dic a l Sa lud de l Institution # of Gra nts 5% Afric a n $183,334, 5% Ce nte r, Va lle de Ame ric a n $255,867, 7% Sa lina s, Breast Cancer Over Time 1 Bre a st $95,401, 3% Ca nc e r, UCSD, E spe ra nza Carrie’s TOUCH African American Breast Cancer 1 $82,336, 2% $296,013, 8% Community Housing Cedars-Sinai Medical Center 1 Corpora tion, $55,000, 2% Ha us of Clinica de Salud del Valle de Salinas 1 Volta , $69,598, 2% UCL A, $643,898, Esperanza Community Housing Corporation 1 18% Haus of Volta 1 San Diego Biomedical Research Institute 1 Sa n Die g o Biome dic a l Sutter Bay Hospital dba California Pacific Medical Sutte r Ba y Hosp Re se a rc h - CPMC, Institute , Center 1 UCB, $645,497, $788,664, 22% $288,000, 8% 18% 1 UC Berkeley UCLA 4 UC San Diego 2 USC 1 CYCL E 24 F UNDI NG ota l 17 Gra nd T

CYCL E 25 F UNDI NG CYCL E

L vie w 2018- 2019 F unding T ime line Ove r OI submission Oc t Oc t Conf Re vie w L OI Re vie w No v No v De c De c App submission Ja n Ja n Letter of Intent Review Oct-Dec • Applicants submit IDEA LOIs by Oct. 25, F F e b e b 2018 2018. Pr Sc ie ntific Re vie w • Council committees receive LOIs Ma r Ma r ogr by Nov. 1 ammatic Re vie w • Scoring completed by Nov. 27 April April • CRC awards do not require LOIs, but applicants may submit research plans for Ma y Ma y review by Oct. 25, 2018 Gr ant F June June • LOI invitation and conference award funding decisions made at Dec. meeting unding July July • Conference Awards are due Nov. 1, 2018 – Outreach committee (and ad hoc July July members) review and bring recommendations to full council Aug Aug

L vie w 2018- 2019 F unding T ime line Ove r OI submission Oc t Conf Re vie w L OI Re vie w No v De c App submission Ja n Programmatic Review Jan-June • Applicants submit CRC and IDEA F e b 2019 applications by Mar 7, 2019. Pr Sc ie ntific Re vie w • Council begins programmatic review in Ma r ogr April ammatic Re vie w • Council committees assigned at April March meeting and members receive review materials Mar 22. Ma y Notify member of triaged Gr applications in May ant F June • Preliminary scores due by May 31 unding • Funding decisions made at June 7 council July meeting July • Finalize programmatic scores in sub-committee Aug • Make final funding recommendations after discussion by the full council

 T wo awards pe r c yc le for up to $50,000 total  One Sta nda r d Confe r e nc e Awa r d  One Community- L e d  Re vie we d by Outre ac h Committe e and Ad Hoc Me mbe rs  E valuate d for:  E lig ibility  Re sponsive ne ss  Outr e a c h  Appr oa c h (for g e ne r a ting ne w ide a s a nd fa c ilita ting c olla bor a tion)  Qua lific a tions of the or g a nize r s  F unding de c ision made at De c e mbe r 1 me e ting  T ime line de pe nde nt on ad hoc me mbe rs and numbe rs of applic ations and L OIs CONF E RE NCE AWARD RE VI E W

 se le c t pr oje c ts that be st me e t our pr ogr ammatic goals;  r e duc e ove r all applic ation volume to e nsur e that PIs submitting a full applic ation have a mor e r e asonable c hanc e of suc c e ss;  lowe r s the c ost of r e vie w c ommitte e s by r e duc ing the numbe r of applic ations to pr oc e ss and r e vie we r s to r e c r uit. L E T T E R OF I NT E NT PURPOSE

oc e ss L e tte r of Inte nt Re vie w Pr Oc t 25 No v 1 No v 27 No v 30 De c 17 De c 1 Mo rn. L OIs Submitte d L OI Pr e liminar y Re vie w Sc or e s c ompile d L OI so rte d , c o mmitte e s L OIs re vie we d a c c o rd ing to Counc il Me e ts Sc o re s a ssig ne d , ma te ria ls c rite ria a nd sc o re s a re c o mpile d & Co unc il d isc uss pro d uc e d sub mitte d . Applic ants c o unc i sc o re s a nd ma ke s Notifie d me mb e rs d e c isio n

 2- pa g e le tte r of inte nt  PI Bioske tc h only  Advoc a c y L e tte r of Commitme nt BOOK L E T CONT E NT S

 Aims a nd spe c ific ity to bre a st c a nc e r: Are the a ims c o nsiste nt with a n I DE A-le ve l pro je c t. Are the a ims spe c ific to b re a st c a nc e r?  Innova tion: T he de g re e o f inno va tive a spe c ts o f the pro po se d pro je c t.  Critic a l Pa th: I s the pa th to imple me nta tio n o f so me thing o f pra c tic a l va lue a t the pa tie nt (risk re duc tio n/ pre ve ntio n o r tre a tme nt) o r c o mmunity le ve l c le a r a nd we ll-de sc rib e d?  Inve stig a tive te a m: Do e s the PI ha ve de mo nstra te d e xpe rtise in b re a st c a nc e r re se a rc h, o r a re c o lla b o ra tio ns pro po se d to a ddre ss this issue ?  Involve me nt of a dvoc a te s. Ha s the PI c o nta c te d a n a ppro pria te a dvo c a c y o rg a niza tio n a b o ut the pro po se d re se a rc h q ue stio n? Are a dvo c a te s a de q ua te ly invo lve d in the de sig n, imple me nta tio n, inte rpre ta tio n, a nd disse mina tio n o f the re sults? RE VI E W CRI T E RI A -15 POI NT T OT AL

 Me e t as full c ounc il  Appr oximate ly 26 L OIs to r e vie w  All L OIs c an be invite d RE VI E W COMMI T T E E E ST I MAT E S

Que stions??? Ka the rine .Mc Ke nzie @uc op.e du (510) 987- 9876