NJSLA Results: Spring 2019 Administrations Measuring College and Cedar Grove School District Career Readiness October 29, 2019 1
NEW JERSEY’S STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM ◼ 2019 marks the first administration of the New Jersey Student Learning Assessment (NJSLA) and the third opportunity to compare year-to-year results as the following slides will show. ◼ Students took NJSLS English Language Arts (ELA) in grades 3–11. ◼ Students took NJSLS Mathematics in grades 3–8 and End of Course Assessments in Algebra I, Geometry and Algebra II, but only up to Grade 10. ◼ Proposed Modifications for Spring 2020 and beyond... 2
GRADUATION REQUIREMENTS: Classes of 2020 - 2022 3
NJSLA PERFORMANCE LEVELS ◼ Level 1 : Not yet meeting grade-level expectations (650-699) ◼ Level 2 : Partially meeting grade-level expectations (700-724) ◼ Level 3 : Approaching grade-level expectations (725-749) ◼ Level 4 : Meeting grade-level expectations (750-809) ◼ Level 5 : Exceeding grade-level expectations (810-850) 4
COMPARISON OF CEDAR GROVE SCHOOL DISTRICT’S STUDENTS TESTED SPRING 2018 AND SPRING 2019 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY Students Tested Year to Year Increase 2018 2019 Grade 3 123 82 - 41 Grade 4 128 120 - 8 Grade 5 110 128 +18 Grade 6 127 109 -18 Grade 7 124 127 +3 Grade 8 131 124 -7 Grade 9 127 124 -3 Grade 10 113 128 +15 TOTAL 983 942 - 41 *Grade 11 does not include students who took an AP/IB test. Note: “Students Tested” represents individual valid test scores for English Language Arts/Literacy. 5
6
SPRING 2018 AND SPRING 2019 PARCC/NJSLA ADMINISTRATIONS English/Language Arts Literacy LEVELS 4 and 5 COMBINED Total Meeting and Exceeding Year to Year 2018 2019 Increase Grade 3 71.6 70.8 - 0.8 Grade 4 82.0 77.5 - 4.5 Grade 5 76.3 79.7 3.4 Grade 6 71.7 75.2 3.5 Grade 7 79.8 85.8 6.0 Grade 8 61.8 74.2 12.4 Grade 9 54.3 70.1 15.8 Grade 10 61.1 60.9 - 0.2 7
DISTRICT INITIATIVES LANGUAGE ARTS ◼ Continued implementation of student-centered differentiated instruction in all grade levels ▪ Emphasis on Grades 2 and 3 ◼ Further analysis of assessment data to determine student needs in order to drive instruction ▪ Link It! ◼ Cross-Curricular alignment of New Jersey Student Learning Standards for English Language Arts into other subject areas ▪ Social Studies ▪ Science ◼ Continued professional development to address reading and writing skills 8
COMPARISON OF CEDAR GROVE SCHOOL DISTRICT’S STUDENTS TESTED SPRING 2018 AND SPRING 2019 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS MATHEMATICS Students Tested Year to Year Increase 2018 2019 Grade 3 123 82 -41 Grade 4 128 120 -8 Grade 5 111 128 +17 Grade 6 127 109 -18 Grade 7 125 127 +2 Grade 8* 79 84 +5 Algebra I 145 117 -28 Geometry 100 132 +32 Algebra II 112 65 -47 TOTAL 1050 964 -86 *Some students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment in place of the 8 th grade Math assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. Notes: “Students Tested” represents individual valid test scores for Mathematics. 9
10 10
SPRING 2018 AND SPRING 2019 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS MATHEMATICS LEVELS 4 and 5 COMBINED Total Meeting and Exceeding Year to Year 2018 2019 Increase 60.2 69.6 9.4 Grade 3 71.1 75.8 4.7 Grade 4 63.1 75.8 12.7 Grade 5 44 50.5 6.5 Grade 6 41.6 52.7 11.1 Grade 7 16.5 26.2 9.7 Grade 8* 46.2 44.5 -1.7 Algebra I 19 23.5 4.5 Geometry 17.9 27.7 9.8 Algebra II 11
COMPARISON OF CEDAR GROVE SCHOOL DISTRICT’S SPRING 2017 to 2019 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS EVIDENCE STATEMENTS 12
COMPARISON OF CEDAR GROVE SCHOOL DISTRICT’S SPRING 2017 to 2019 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS EVIDENCE STATEMENTS 13
COMPARISON OF CEDAR GROVE SCHOOL DISTRICT’S SPRING 2017 to 2019 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS EVIDENCE STATEMENTS 14
COMPARISON OF CEDAR GROVE SCHOOL DISTRICT’S SPRING 2017 to 2019 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS EVIDENCE STATEMENTS 15
DISTRICT INITIATIVES MATHEMATICS ◼ Continued professional development to address problem solving skills ▪ Department Goals ▪ Self-Assessment, Mathematical Practices, Conversation - “Math Talk” ▪ Conquer Math (Grades K - 10) ▪ Open-Ended Questions + Financial Literacy - Grades 5 - 8 ▪ Algebra I, Geometry + increased investigation-based instruction, manipulatives ▪ Interdisciplinary Connections, Literature in Math, Special Education, Open-Ended - K - 4 ◼ Modified Assessments for SGO Process in Mathematics ▪ Standards-based “point of entry” approach ▪ Increased vertical and horizontal articulation and Consistency K - 12 ◼ Further analysis of assessment data to determine student needs in order to drive instruction ▪ Moby Max in K - 8 ▪ Link It! 16
Recommend
More recommend
