2_Title Slide Clean Energy for Low Income Communities Accelerator (CELICA) CESA Workshop June 15 2017
CELICA State/Local Partners (38 in Total) State Partners Local Government Partners Community Action, Non-Profits, Utilities State of California Chicago, IL Couleecap Community Action Agency State of Colorado Cleveland, OH Community Action Partnership of Oregon State of Connecticut, Connecticut Duluth, MN Community Action Program of Green Bank, Eversource Energy & Evansville and Vanderburgh County Illuminating Holdings Corporation District of Columbia Fresno, CA / Local Government Hawkeye Area Community Action Commission Program State of Florida Gary, IN Opportunity Council State of Illinois Holland, MI Association for Energy Affordability State of Iowa Newark, NJ Energy Outreach Colorado Commonwealth of Massachusetts Oakland, CA Mercy Housing State of Michigan Orlando, FL Renewable Energy Transition Initiative State of Minnesota Rochester, NY San Antonio Housing Authority State of Missouri Chattanooga, TN & EPB Electric Power Pacific Gas & Electric NYSERDA Philadelphia, PA & Tennessee Valley Authority Philadelphia Energy Authority State of Tennessee State of Washington
Baselining Tools Baseline Assessment Guide Program Catalog
State LMI Energy Data Profiles NUMBER OF HOUSING UNITS PERCENT OF HOUSING UNITS TYPE 600,000 100% CONSTRUCTION YEAR 90% HEATING FUEL TYPE 500,000 80% NUMBER OF UNITS 70% 400,000 60% COUNTY_NAME 300,000 50% Poweshiek County 40% State of Iowa (Example) 200,000 Ringgold County 30% Sac County 20% 100,000 10% Scott County - 0% Shelby County 0-60% AMI 60-80% 80-100% 100%+ 0-60% AMI 60-80% 80-100% 100%+ 0-60% AMI 60-80% 80-100% 100%+ AMI 0-60% AMI 60-80% 80-100% 100%+ AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI Sioux County OWNER RENTER OWNER RENTER Story County 2000+ 1980-99 1960-79 1940-59 BEFORE 1940 2000+ 1980-99 1960-79 1940-59 BEFORE 1940 Tama County Taylor County ENERGY BURDEN [AVG EXPENDITURES/AVG INCOME] AVERAGE MONTHLY ENERGY EXPENDITURES [$/MONTH] Union County 3,000 12% 300 Van Buren County 2,500 10% 250 Wapello County Warren County 2,000 8% 200 Washington County 1,500 6% 150 Wayne County Webster County 1,000 4% 100 Winnebago County 500 2% 50 Winneshiek County Woodbury County - 0% - 0-60% 60-80% 80-100% 100%+ 0-60% 60-80% 80-100% 100%+ 0-60% AMI 60-80% 80-100% 100%+ AMI 0-60% AMI 60-80% 80-100% 100%+ AMI Worth County AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI OWNER RENTER OWNER RENTER Wright County ANNUAL ENERGY COST PERCENT OF INCOME 2000+ 1980-99 1960-79 1940-59 BEFORE 1940
LMI Community Solution Pathways Solutions in … Residential buildings Community networks / assets Commercial buildings Utility networks 5
Energy efficiency + rooftop solar combo Leverage or expand existing Support emerging energy assistance programs program/business models • WAP/LIHEAP • Solar project aggregation / Wx plus solar bulk purchasing • Municipality • Blend of financing and residential/commercial funding for energy energy campaigns efficiency + solar standard • Utility offerings • Volunteers / donations / integrated bill assistance and demand side mgmt crowdsourcing • Affordable housing renovations tax credit financing, ESPCs 6
LMI community solar with EE linkages Non-profit-driven LMI participant models with carve outs from private tax-credit- community solar programs financing partners LMI Brownfields used community for community/ dedicated solar shared solar demonstration projects projects Link with energy efficiency to engage participants, improve impact, and reduce costs: 1. Promote, incentivize or require Wx by participants 2. Wx homes are a qualified pipeline for LMI solar subscribers 7
Partner Example: Michigan State of Michigan Community solar demonstration projects Combines WAP/LIHEAP, utility, community foundation funding Proof of concept to secure additional charge for market- rate Community Solar patrons to contribute to a longer term slush fund 8
Recommend
More recommend
