PERU'S PROPOSAL FOR AN EMISSION REDUCTIONS PERU'S PROPOSAL FOR AN EMISSION REDUCTIONS PROGRAM IN SAN MARTÍN AND UCAYALI PROGRAM IN SAN MARTÍN AND UCAYALI Clarifications Clarifications Berioska Quispe Estrada Ministry of Environment of Perú July, 2019
Overview TAP’s final assessment: • 52 indicators met • 11 indicators not met → 10 major non-conformities • 15 indicators not applicable at this time In addition, 57 comments received by FCPF participants in May 2019 → Country’s response sent in the Matrix of Comments and Team Responses document, on June 4 th . Final comments received in July 2019.
Carbon Accounting (Ind. 5.1 & Ind. 8.2) A set of improvements will be developed for the RL and FREL: • Development of the Forest Reference Emission Level: Including uncertainty Deforestation + Degradation Submission of updated analysis • Update of ER Program FREL to the UNFCCC Reference Level 2019 2020 2021 • Development of the Mixed • Validation of degradation maps FREL approval Approach for monitoring (field work and high-resolution degradation. satellite images). • Preliminary degradation maps • Development of carbon stocks for the Amazon. for degradation classes. • Development of the method and • Validation of Land Use Change maps of Secondary Forest areas. Maps (periods to be defined).
Nesting (Ind. 23) Relevant actors engaged in constructing the nesting scheme: MINAM, SERNANP, SERFOR, REDD+ Initiatives. Other actors to be involved this year to finalize the development of the technical proposal Political discussion and approval of technical proposal Nesting implementation in 2020: - Update of FREL - Development of a normative tool - Linkages with National Registry of Mitigation Initiatives Full operation from 2021 in the Amazon
Safeguards (Ind. 24.2) Update of the National SESA and ESMF Finished In design • World Bank's ESS and inputs from the ER Program process. To be developed Implementation • Design and development of monitoring and evaluation tools. of the SIS NATIONAL LEVEL • Institutional arrangements. 2020 November December June July September October August Environmental and Social Communication Plan SESA ESMF ER PROGRAM LEVEL Commitment Plan (ESCP) Analysis and evaluation of the compliance of Analysis of impacts and risks; identification of preliminary mitigation measures. the Program's interventions with the Bank's ESS, and the existing national legal framework. Preliminary analysis of the compliance of the Update and improvement of Development of the ER Program safeguards Program's interventions with the Bank's ESS, the Stakeholder plans, including guidelines and procedures and the existing national legal framework. Engagement Plan manuals for compliance with the World Bank's Stakeholder consultation, focusing on risk and ESS. measures prioritization. Consultation and participation with key Update and improvement of stakeholders. Preliminary SESA for the ER Program. the Plan for Indigenous Institutional arrangements for safeguards Peoples Adjustments and improvements. implementation, monitoring and evaluation .
Sustainable Program Design and Implementation (Ind. 28.1 & 28.2) Conflicts A high level Commission (MINAGRI, MINAM, MINCU) is working directly between with indigenous organizations to provide support and close the current gap communities SERFOR mandated to develop guidelines to remeasure BPP, in addition to Permanent Production actions aimed to simplify procedures and accelerate the process and reduce Forests (BPP) the costs of land titling Overlapping conflicts Various ways have been sought to reach an agreement with the communities Protected Natural within the current regulatory framework so that their territorial rights are Areas recognized Overlapping individual A normative proposal has been developed that prevents the granting of properties with these rights over the communities indigenous communities We continue working to generate more norms and mechanisms to address conflicts over land overlapping and to reduce the gap in communities’ land titling before our Bicentennial Anniversary
Sustainable Program Design and Implementation Benefit sharing (Ind. 33.1) Pending issues Type of benefits Link to Transversal Criteria, timeline Consultation Legal Monitoring & beneficiaries strategy approaches & processes process framework A clear schedule has been agreed with regional governments and stakeholders. This accomplish meets the pending issue regarding consultation process 1 st planning GORES 3 BSM Draft Participatory Approval May designate June meeting (RGs July consultation August September October proposal process process delegates + MINAM) workshops 1. Legal framework 2. Beneficiaries 3. Financial administrator The consultation process The structure of the BSM draft 4. Governance incorporates the transversal proposal includes criteria, 1. Indigenous organizations a. Monitoring approaches as can be seen in procedures, timeline, 2. Government & Academy 5. Eligible activities (Interventions the way how stakeholders has monitoring and legal 3. Private sector & CSO matrix) been divided in the first framework. 6. Criteria of BS allocation consultation stage The framework is the a. Stock / Flow intervention matrix of the PRE b. Scenarios 7. Procedures 8. Audits
Ind. 28.3, 36.1, 36.2 & 36.3 Transfer of ER Current legal framework states that forest heritage, including environmental services, belongs to the Nation but forest holders have the right to access to their benefits. MINAM has the authority to regulate it and administer ER. • Technical meetings for coordination and consulting with related public institutions and experts on the subject June • Preparation of draft text by MINAM, including legal basis, statement of reasons, reports, studies and public feedback July • Stakeholders participation, including posting in electronic portal, in the official newspaper and review and acquittal of citizen contributions August • Consulting to the vice-ministerial Coordination Commission and with other involved sectors Sept. • Headed by the President and referendum with involved Ministers Oct. • Posting in official newspaper for formal approval Nov. MINAM’s legal power to sign ERPA and transfer ER
Additional Comments by FCPF Participants • On Degradation: → The Mixed Approach is under development and involves the Indirect and Direct Methods. → The results obtained will be used for updating the ER Program Reference Level and for monitoring during the accounting period → Updates are allowed before the 1st verification event. → Similarly, results will be used for the updated Amazonian FREL. → Deforested areas previously degraded will be excluded from the degradation emissions estimation and will be accounted in the deforestation emissions. • On Nesting: → Overestimated impact to ER Program emission reductions by projects. An exact estimation will be done over the updated RL. → Adjustments to ER volumes from the 1 st monitoring period can be made as needed.
• On the development of the platform of the National Registry of Mitigation Measures: 2019 ( January - From 2018 (September - 2019 May - September ) April ) 2020 December) • Software design for the Registry • Signature of the contract Registry of • Training on the operation of the Platform (MINAM & IS MARKIT) mitigation • Conducting tests and system Registry (DGCCD Team) • Process management under the measures • Development of user manuals. adjustments (First phase of QA BPM methodology (continuous) • Implementation, hosting and Tests & Second phase of QA Tests & • Development of RESTFul UAT tests) maintenance (Back up system) Webservices for interoperability • Results of the design of tests that • Proposal for the Register with SINIA of MINAM (National allow to know and determine the maintenance period Environmental Information • Piloting Phase (Two months) necessary adjustments that are System) required to implement the system
Muchas Gracias
Recommend
More recommend
