cise reu evaluation toolkit
play

CISE REU EVALUATION TOOLKIT Audrey Rorrer, PhD Audrey Rorrer, PhD - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CISE REU EVALUATION TOOLKIT Audrey Rorrer, PhD Audrey Rorrer, PhD University of North Carolina at Charlotte University of North Carolina at Charlotte College of Computing & Informatics audrey.rorrer@uncc.edu audrey.rorrer@uncc.edu NSF


  1. CISE REU EVALUATION TOOLKIT Audrey Rorrer, PhD Audrey Rorrer, PhD University of North Carolina at Charlotte University of North Carolina at Charlotte College of Computing & Informatics audrey.rorrer@uncc.edu audrey.rorrer@uncc.edu NSF CISE REU PI Meeting, Orlando, FL, March 2016

  2. Agenda  Birds Eye View of Toolkit Components  Common Application, Shared Applicant Pool  A la Carte Survey, Faculty Survey  Outcomes  Future  Alumni Tracking Tool NSF CISE REU PI Meeting, Orlando, FL, March 2016

  3. History of Evaluation Project 2009 Working Group Members Guy Alain Amousou Chris Aberson Wendy Cooper Teresa Dahlberg Andy Fagg Stephen Gilbert Manfred Huber Niels Lobo Sanjay Madrias Joan Peckham Eric Wong Yu-Dong Yoa Kevin Zeng New Modules Faculty Research Module Study Needs Assessment & Established Common Inclusive Terminology Study Indicators & Tools Alumni Shared Applicant Pool Tracker Instructional Videos 2010 2009 2013 UNC Charlotte Humbolt State 2014-16 Toolkit Expansion Project NSF CISE REU PI Meeting, Orlando, FL, March 2016

  4. Online Evaluation • Evaluation Toolkit: reu.uncc.edu/cise-reu-toolkit • How To videos Toolkit • Evaluation materials and resources tailored to CISE REU Common • Google Form application UNIQUE to site • Standardized & customizable Application • Aggregate descriptive statistics across CISE directorate Shared Applicant • Managed via Google Drive & Common Applications • Site PI “releases” unselected candidates Pool • All PIs have access to online folder Surveys: A la • Student Outcomes: modulated, valid/reliable Carte and Faculty • Faculty Impact: Survey deploying summer 2016 Alumni Follow • Prototype: Review and comment! Up Tool NSF CISE REU PI Meeting, Orlando, FL, March 2016

  5. Launching Toolkit Options Common Application: Reply to email call outs: Oct, Nov, Dec, Jan, Feb Shared Applicant Pool: All PIs will have access ; Includes students who have not been selected and gave permission OR: Contact A la Carte Survey: Reply to email call audrey.rorrer outs: April, May @uncc.edu Faculty Survey : Summer 2016! Alumni Tracker Tool : under construction NSF CISE REU PI Meeting, Orlando, FL, March 2016

  6. Alumni Toolkit Development Working Group Jan 2016 Working Group Members: Lazaros Gallos, Rutgers • Claire Duggan, Northeastern U. • Feedback: Bonnie Swan, U. Central Florida • Breakout Prototype1 Session Review Stephen Gilbert, Iowa State • Today @ 2 Tiffany Reardon, Berkeley • Huirong Fu, Oakland • Jamie Payton, UNC Charlotte • Raja Kushalnagar, RIT • Prototype 2 Revisions NSF CISE REU PI Meeting, Orlando, FL, March 2016

  7. The Common Application NSF CISE REU PI Meeting, Orlando, FL, March 2016

  8. Applicants: Challenges & Solutions Individual NSF-CISE Technical Value Sites Community Tools Free= inflexible Replication of Understand Aggregate human capital Candidate Pool: Description of Supply & candidate traits Customized= Demand Expensive Efficiency in shared set of application items DIY= Buggy Site autonomy Observe Trends Provides shared applicant pool No Desire for as needed Centralization NSF CISE REU PI Meeting, Orlando, FL, March 2016

  9. 5 Year Trends in Common Applications 2012 2013 2014 2015 Site Descriptors 2010 (N=13) 2011 (N=20) (N=22) (N= 26) (N=25) (N= 23) Range of # Applicants 29-152 4-176 18-212 20-299 29-232 15- 349 Avg Applications per Site 77 79 93 112 102 122 Largest # of Sites Applied to by Individual 30 (n=1) 6 (n=1) 7 (n=2) 18 (n=1) 14 (n=1) 16 (n=1) Unique vs Multiple Site Applicants Unique Applicants Total Applicants Applicants Applying to 1+ Sites 2905 2827 2445 2144 2119 1934 1706 1562 1105 1006 851 761 739 697 708 372 309 254 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 NSF CISE REU PI Meeting, Orlando, FL, March 2016

  10. Applicant Demographic Trends Applicant Underrepresented Minority Applicant Gender Distribution Distribution Male Female Unspecified White/Asian URM Unspecified 1546 1503 1471 1221 1354 1156 1128 989 741 615 668 593 549 569 557 500 522 494 461 380 288 220 194 187 56 24 48 9 6 4 5 26 16 24 24 10 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 28% 34% 36% 31% 31% 35% 27% 26% 24% 28% 27% 26% NSF CISE REU PI Meeting, Orlando, FL, March 2016

  11. Common Applications: Graduate School Plans  Majority plan to pursue graduate degrees  79% in 2013  80% in 2014  84% in 2015  Few are first generation college students  Less than 20% across all 5 years  17% are first person in family to attend college (2015) NSF CISE REU PI Meeting, Orlando, FL, March 2016

  12. A Geographical Look 2015 Common Applications NSF CISE REU PI Meeting, Orlando, FL, March 2016

  13. The A la Carte Student Survey Rorrer, A.S. (2016). An evaluation capacity building toolkit for principal investigators of undergraduate research experiences: A demonstration of transforming theory into practice, Evaluation and Planning, 55(April 2016), 103-111. NSF CISE REU PI Meeting, Orlando, FL, March 2016

  14. Student Outcomes: Challenges & Solutions Individual NSF-CISE Technical Value Sites Community Tools Replication of Customizable Aggregate Measurement human capital survey analysis more Reliability & powerful than Validity sites Budgets focused Packaged on students not dataset evaluation Augment Site autonomy individual site DIY = loss of Analysis is ‘Teed assessment reliability and Up” validity NSF CISE REU PI Meeting, Orlando, FL, March 2016

  15. A la Carte Student Survey Modular, pre/post assessment of student outcomes • • Self Efficacy Research Skills – I can formulate a research problem – Formulate a research hypothesis – Write a research paper for • Intent to attend graduate school publication – I plan to apply to graduate school in a • Leadership in Science computing discipline - I know how to be good team • Attitudes towards computing member – I like to use computer science to - I know how to encourage team solve problems performance • Help seeking/coping skills • Professional Identity as Scientist – When I do poorly on an exam, - I feel like I belong in science typically I….skip class • Mentoring Satisfaction (post-only) • My mentor was helpful in providing direction and guidance on research NSF CISE REU PI Meeting, Orlando, FL, March 2016 project issues

  16. A la Carte 2015 Outcomes Significant Effects for Time (pre- and post- surveys, * (p<.05) in Self-Efficacy, Research Knowledge, and Leadership Construct Pre (SD) Post (SD) • 38% Female N=187 N=169 • 32% multi-ethnic Self-Efficacy 3.87 (.64) 4.34 (.59)* minority groups Intent to Grad School 3.86 (.79) 3.78 (.89) • Predominantly Rising Juniors and Attitudes 4.33 (.55) 4.23 (.66) Seniors Help-Seeking/ 3.99 (.49) 4.01 (.51) Coping Note: 5 pt Likert scale Research Knowledge 3.37 (.69) 4.04 (.61)* Scientific Identity 3.62 (.88) 3.81 (1.06) Leadership 4.24 (.57) 4.37 (.56)* Mentorship Not applicable 4.47 (.74) NSF CISE REU PI Meeting, Orlando, FL, March 2016

  17. A la Carte 2015: Interactions Minority Groups: Main effects for Gender and Minority Groups were Higher Help-seeking/coping, observed * Significant differences (p<.05) Efficacy, Leadership and Research Women: Higher Help- Construct Majority URM seeking/coping (SD) (SD) Help-Seeking/ 3.93 4.17 Construct Male Female Coping (.50) (.53)* (SD) (SD) Help- 3.92 4.13 Self-efficacy 4.26 4.50 Seeking/ (.52) (.51)* (.70) (.47)* Coping Leadership 4.26 4.60 (.58) (.47)* Caveat: The effect sizes were very small Research 3.93 4.20 (<.07) Knowledge (.64) (.55)* NSF CISE REU PI Meeting, Orlando, FL, March 2016

  18. Post Program Evaluation 2015 Item Mean SD Your Faculty Advisor 4.33 1.09 Your Housing arrangements (if applicable) 4.19 1.03 The program in general 4.31 .97 Your research experience 4.42 .87 Your interaction with project staff 4.37 .89 Your interaction with other students 4.65 .72 NSF CISE REU PI Meeting, Orlando, FL, March 2016

  19. Post Program Evaluation Most rewarding experiences: • Connections with faculty and peers • “working with faculty and other students” • “friends + research” • Mentoring “one on one with my faculty advisor ” • • Learning • “learning new skills” • “learning what grad research is like” Most frustrated experiences: • Lack of understanding; Time Constraints • “having to work on a subject I didn’t understand” • “ the initial amount of reading to understand basic concepts” • “Rushing” NSF CISE REU PI Meeting, Orlando, FL, March 2016

  20. Take Aways  Students are reporting statistically significant gains in Self-Efficacy, Research Knowledge, and Leadership  No causal link but  Students are developing and exploring research skills  Long-term follow up needed  Deeper Studies!!! NSF CISE REU PI Meeting, Orlando, FL, March 2016

  21. Faculty Survey NSF CISE REU PI Meeting, Orlando, FL, March 2016

Recommend


More recommend