chemical properties that a fg ect binding of enzyme
play

Chemical properties that a fg ect binding of enzyme-inhibiting drugs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Chemical properties that a fg ect binding of enzyme-inhibiting drugs to enzymes Research proposal by Dan Nacu ? Global Pharmaceutical Industry $400,000,000,000 http:/ /www.who.int/trade/glossary/story073/en/ Drug Development Computer


  1. Chemical properties that a fg ect binding of enzyme-inhibiting drugs to enzymes Research proposal by Dan Nacu

  2. ?

  3. Global Pharmaceutical Industry $400,000,000,000 http:/ /www.who.int/trade/glossary/story073/en/

  4. Drug Development Computer Simulations

  5. How can it be done? Simulation Models Shape Complementarity Chemical Properties

  6. How can it be done? Chemical Properties Solvent Accessible Surface Area Hydrophobicity Electrostatics Van Der Waal’s Forces Residue Pair potential Desolvation Energies Atomic Contact Energies Complementary Determining Regions etc… A lot of options…

  7. Its been done before… in a di fg erent way. Li et al, 2007 Their Equation

  8. Its been done before…in a di fg erent way. Li et al, 2007 Their Results

  9. How will this be di fg erent? Introducing HINT H ydropathic INT eractions The HINT Equation

  10. Why HINT? Its more true to life

  11. HINT j i two atoms

  12. HINT a ffj nity score for single interaction All interactions are summed at end

  13. HINT hydrophobic atom constant hydrophobic atom constant i j hydrophobic character of interaction sum Log P 1-octanol/water

  14. HINT accessible (inside) non-accessible

  15. HINT Electrostatics hydrophobic-hydrophobic hydrophobic-polar acid-base hydrogen bond polar-polar acid-acid base-base returns +1 or -1

  16. HINT Atomic Distance j j j i decreased interaction

  17. HINT Lennard-Jones Potential j j j i i i too close too far just right

  18. What can be done? By weighing each variable in HINT, the most important chemical property for enzyme/ inhibitor complexes can be found. Why exponents?

  19. Why exponents? Li et al HINT

  20. Overview of Experiment Benchmark 5 PDB File Modi fj ed Equation Similarity to True-Structure Decision

  21. What’s the experiment? Start with 46 enzyme inhibitor complexes from the Benchmark 5.

  22. What’s the experiment? Bound Unbound FTDock What’s FTDock?

  23. FTDock Rotation & translation in 3D space to fj nd all possible con fj gurations.

  24. What’s the experiment? FTDock Huge list of possible complexes

  25. What’s the experiment? Huge list of possible complexes L_RMSD Testing Ligand_Root-Mean-Square-Deviation What’s L_RMSD Testing?

  26. L_RMSD Testing Σ ( ) 2 atom x 1 - atom x 2 total # of atoms

  27. What’s the experiment? L_RMSD Testing Top 20 Structures

  28. What’s the experiment? Top 20 Structures For 46 complexes = 920 simulated structures. For both bound and unbound, 1,840 total Lets look at just one

  29. What’s the experiment? Why these exponents?

  30. What’s the experiment? In the end… 23,000 HINT Scores for Bound 23,000 HINT Scores for Unbound 6,325,000 scores 46•20•5•5 = 23,000

  31. What’s the experiment? Highest 50 HINT Scores for each complex L_RMSD Testing Find best match for each complex

  32. Interpreting result Enzyme-Inhibitor Simulated Complex Best L_RMSD Score: 4 Å b ij = a i a j S i S j (T ij ) 1.5 R ij + r ij HINT weight used: Electrostatics

  33. Possible Results

  34. Possible Results

  35. In the future… Di fg erent models (besides HINT) Di fg erent complexes (besides enzyme/inhibitor)

  36. Questions?

  37. Extras

  38. Electrostatics Table Kellogg and Abraham, 2001

Recommend


More recommend