By By th the e end of of th this s sessio ion we w will l hav ave an an unders rstan andin ing of of th the fol ollo lowin ing: A model el f for tea eacher er ev evaluation based ed o on curren ent res esea earch The e FEAPs Ps as a framew ework for the e obser ervation proces ess The he corre rrelation n of BEST ST in in the he obse servatio ion rub rubri rics The he re revise ised st struc ructure of the he inst instruc uctional l appraisal s system em
Evalu luatio ion p proc rocess re requires a a tw two-way ay dialogue betwee een o observer a and o obser ervee ee A A tea each cher’s i impact a as a a lea eader o on the s e sch chool should d extend d beyond d the classroom Th The p prim rimary p purpose of of an e evalu aluatio ion is is to to improve ve instruction, e evi videnced b d by s stude dent achievement
Th The d develo lopme ment of t of th the e evalu luatio ion p proc rocess for a any ny one ne t teacher is de designed w with t h the he i inp nput of of both oth te teacher a and ad admi ministrati tion Evalu luatio ion f for th or the te teac acher is is an an on ongoin oing re refle lecti tive p proc rocess It t ta takes more more th than an on one ob observatio ion to to ev eval aluate t the ef e effectiveness of a a teac eacher
Tea eacher ef effec ectiveness i is co correlated t to the e le level l of of stu tudent t engag ageme ment t an and stu tudent t perfor orman mance ce Fundamental l to to all all we do o is is th the underly lying purpo pose: Impr provi ving stu tudent t achiev evemen ent th thro rough grow rowth th in in re refle lectio ion, colla ollaboratio ion, an and p prof rofessio ional p l pra ractic ice.
Al All tea teacher ers will i increa ease th e thei eir expert rtis ise and d skill ill level l from year r to to yea ear which allow ows ga gains in stu student achiev eveme ment from om yea ear to to year.
PROFESS SSIONA NAL PRACT CTICES CES 30 P 30 Points: : Professional Practices 50%Multi-Metric 6 P Points ts: : Professional Growth Plan Development (50 pts) 10 P 10 Points: : Plan Implementation 4 P Points ts: : Collaboration & Mutual Accountability INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTABILITY BASED ON IDENTIFIED ASSESSMENTS 50% 45 Po 45 Points: Individual Results ts Student Achievement 5 Points: 5 Po : Collaborative team student achievement (50 pts) results related to closing t the a achievement g gap of the Lowest 25% in Reading and/or Math
Annual Evaluation of Professional Practices 30 Pts ◦ reflects evidence collected during formal and informal observations Professional Growth Plan Development 6 Pts PGP Implementation 10 Pts Collaboration and Mutual Accountability 4 Pts
BPS I Instr truct ction onal Performance Ap Appraisal S Syst ystem Dimens nsions Instructional Design & Lesson Planning Learning Environment Instructional Delivery & Facilitation Assessment Professional Responsibilities & Ethical Conduct
Development of PGP Goal Work Plan Strategies Outcome Measures and Reflection
* Individual pre-conference meetings with administrator * Teachers may collaborate with others in development but no plan should be identical * PGP goal may continue into second year if student data indicates a need for continued professional growth in a particular area * Strategies and outcome indicators would be differentiated in year two
For teachers returning to BPS, reflect on last • year’s annual evaluation and student achievement results to develop your “stretch goal.” Wednesday, August 27, is an early release day • designated for PGP development activity. You may submit a draft plan to your • administrator for review prior to scoring by August 29, 2014. Final due date for PGP’s: Friday, September 26 •
For teachers new to BPS, reflect on your first • semester observations and midterm evaluation to develop your “stretch goal.” You may submit a draft plan to your • administrator for review prior to scoring by January 9, 2015. Final due date for PGP’s: Friday, January 23, • 2015
Working the Plan Peer observations are required for a “Distinguished” rating In-Process Monitoring Evidence to support implementation may include training records, peer observations, student work samples, lesson plans, parent communication, other artifacts illustrating efforts to implement the strategies and use feedback from colleagues to improve instructional practice. Evidence not required for indicators or dimensions observed by the administrator.
Teams have two purposes: working together to improve each other’s instructional practice, and working with at-risk students to improve their achievement and close the achievement gap. Groups may be by grade level, department, cohorts, within or outside the school. All teacher teams must have at least 8 students and specify learning targets and measures. Deadline to identify teacher teams, students, achievement measures, and targeted outcomes: October 3, 2014
Formative Time frame provided to teacher Pre-conference required Full lesson segment Use classroom observation instrument (COI) ◦ Post-conference with scored feedback within 10 days ◦ Scored feedback = evidence for evaluations
Formative Minimum of two for all teachers by administrator Scored feedback provided within 5 days electronically or face to face Scored feedback = evidence for evaluations
Teachers new to Brevard ◦ Probationary for one year ◦ Minimum of two informal observations by administrator ◦ Two formal observations, midterm evaluation, and annual evaluation conducted by administrator ◦ Two additional informal observations by administrator, mentor teacher, or other qualified persons
◦ Tea eache hers no not m meet eeting ef effective e standa dard rds o of instruc ructio iona nal p l practic ice Inter erim im e evaluat aluation Writ Written PDAP for r dim imensio ions sco corin ring g 2. 2.9 9 or r lo lower Spec ecific ific s strat rateg egies ies, s sug ugges estio ions ns, improv ovements ts Spec ecific ific & & reas asonab nable le timel melin ine t e to correc rect defic ficie ient a areas eas
Admin inistra trator tors m may condu duct a t additi tion onal l forma rmal l or informa ormal o l observ rvati tion ons and m may v vide deota otape pe instr truction tional p practic tice. If evid idence f from rom a an obs observation or or vide ideo will be ill be used in the e evalu luation tion, w writte ten f feedba back k must t be be pro provid ided to th to the te teacher prior prior to th to the evalu luation tion m meetin ing. g. Admi dminis istrators rs ma may als lso c o con onduct walk lk-thr hroug ughs hs or or in instructio ional rou rounds. These e events a are re f for or dat ata co a collec ection an and ar are e not u used ed in a a teach eacher er’s evalu luation tion. Teach Teachers ar are e en enco couraged ed t to observe one e anot other a and pro d provide feedb dback to on to one a anoth other. Th Thes ese o e observations ar are n e not u used ed i in a a teach eacher’s evalu luation tion b but may be prov ovide ided t d to admin inis istra trator tor as PGP i imple leme menta tation tion evide dence.
PS PSC T C Tea eacher er who rec ecei eives es a a sec econd “unsa unsatis isfactory ry” ra rating ing o or r thre hree ne needs s im impro rovement nt ra rating ings in s in a thre hree y year r perio riod sha shall ll be e placed ed on probation for 90 calendar days Four f r formal rmal o obser servat atio ions will ll be c conducted ed Admi minis istrat rator w r will a ill assess ssess p perfo rform rman ance a e again ain no m more t re than 1 an 14 days s after t er the e e end of the 90 90-day ay p probat atio iona nary ry p perio riod a and submit a recomme mmendation r regard rding ing f future empl ployment s status s to the S Supe perintende dent
Summat ative e eval aluat ation, P , Par art I 50 points Formal evaluation of professional practices from formal and informal observations (30 points) PGP Development (6 points) PGP Implementation (10 points) Collaborative/Mutual Accountability Score (4 points) Signed in the spring by teacher and administrator Use results to guide reflection for next year’s PGP goal
Summa mmativ ive E Evaluatio ion Part I II ◦ Totals 100 points ◦ Includes Summative Part I and Student Achievement Scores ◦ Signed by Teacher and Administrator in the fall
Sc Scores a s added together fr from Summative P Part rt I I and S Summative P Part II II det etermine fi final rating: Highl ghly Effe Effective, Effe Effective, Need Needs s to Im Improve or or Unsat atisfact actory P Performan ance ce
Recommend
More recommend
