building technology capacity at monona grove
play

Building Technology Capacity at Monona Grove A PLAN TO SUPPORT 21 ST - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Building Technology Capacity at Monona Grove A PLAN TO SUPPORT 21 ST CENTURY LEARNING Objectives for Technology at Monona Grove Prepare students for global opportunities Provide staff with an effective, efficient system Remain


  1. Building Technology Capacity at Monona Grove A PLAN TO SUPPORT 21 ST CENTURY LEARNING

  2. Objectives for Technology at Monona Grove Prepare students for global opportunities • Provide staff with an effective, efficient system • Remain competitive with area school districts •

  3. Monona Grove Computer Network: 2012 1400 computers • Average computer age: 4.5 years old • Wireless buildings: 0 • Average Internet speed into MG buildings: 13 megabits/sec •

  4. Current Pressures on Monona Grove’s Technology Environment • An explosion of demand by students and staff • A proliferation of student portable devices • Area districts surpass us in wireless and mobile technology • 25% reduction in tech budget since 2000, in real dollars • Tech support staffing 30% below national, state, and area norms • Aging computers • Computer access deemed insufficient by staff and students

  5. Student and Staff Perceptions • Insufficient student access • Unreliable/slow internet access o Insufficient bandwidth o Slow computers • Inadequate technician response time

  6. Consequences • Lost educational opportunities for students • Lost work time for teachers and other staff • Weakened comparison with area districts

  7. 21 st Century Students Need: • Access to worldwide information resources, on demand • Ability to adapt to rapidly changing technologies • Technology-savvy teachers and staff

  8. 21 st Century Staff Need Resources To: • Communicate with parents and students • Collaborate with other staff • Build professional knowledge • Model and design 21st century learning for students • Have a system that lets them operate efficiently

  9. Limited Access Computer Labs Can’t Support Current and Future Demand Not enough computers to flexibly meet our students needs • Not enough labs • Not enough space in existing labs • Internet bottleneck, systemwide •

  10. Providing Access on Demand With Mobile Wireless Devices Access to the Internet whenever, wherever • Individual students or entire classes can use computers in class, • whether labs are available or not Devices: Laptops, iPads, Chromebooks, Kindles, Nooks, iPod • Touches, tablets, netbooks, and many more

  11. Requirements for Mobile Wireless and Robust Internet Access Robust Internet access District Wide • Sufficiently fast desktop computers (for staff) • Wireless environment in every building • Mobile devices (for students) •

  12. Robust Internet Access Has Become Indispensable Key services and data are moving to the cloud • MAP and other tests will soon be delivered via the Internet • Key data reports are delivered via the Internet • DPI’s Student Information System will be delivered via the Internet • Student and staff will increasingly interact via the cloud • MG students will move toward taking some or many classes online •

  13. Robust Internet Access Has Become Indispensable Staff development will be done increasingly via videoconference • Use of Google Apps is becoming widespread among students and staff • E-school offerings are evolving and becoming an educational norm • Video is delivered via the Internet • Textbooks will be delivered increasingly online • The number of devices at MG requiring Internet access is continually • increasing

  14. Desktop Speed Affects Internet Speed • Current state: average desktop computer is 4.5 years old • Replacement cycle: acquire 2 year old computers, replace at 7 years old • Result: 3/5 of our desktop computers are 5, 6, or 7 years old • Substantially hinders Internet Access • Proposed solution: buy new computers and replace them every 5 years

  15. Installing Wireless at MG: Hardware Components • Access points (similar to home access points, but centrally managed) • Cabling to every access point • Wireless controller to manage access points • Biggest costs: access points, cabling

  16. Installing Wireless at MG: Building by Building • MGHS: 50 access points, limited cabling costs • GDS: 40 access points, no cabling costs • Elementary Schools: 30 access points each, new cabling needed to every access point

  17. Accumulating Mobile Devices at MG: • Incremental approach • Year 1: Chromebooks and iPads for checkout at all buildings • Year 2: Add these and other devices as demand develops • Year 3 and beyond: move to blended checkout and “BYOD” environment

  18. Recap: System Requirements To Support Student and Staff Needs • Increased student computer access via mobile devices • Reliable wireless throughout every building • Internet access comparable to home access o Increased internet bandwidth o Workstations 1 – 5 years old • Adequate tech staffing

  19. Getting From Here to There: A Proposed Sequence of Steps • Add 1 FTE technician • Install wireless at all schools • Increase Internet bandwidth to Cottage Grove schools • Implement MUFN fiber network in Monona • Replace all computers older than 5 years with new computers • Add portable wireless devices based on demand

  20. Technology Planning Process • Solicit input from all stakeholders on • Connection of technology to curriculum • Identification of key student skills • Staff development • Development of needed processes • Procurement • Resource distribution • Student use of portable devices • Create regular building tech committee meeting schedule in every building • Reconstitute District Technology Committee • Permanent members: Directors of Technology, Business Services, and Instruction • Annual members: 1 rep from each building committee • District committee creates district tech plan based on input from stakeholders and building committees

  21. Budget • Current operational budget: $275,000 • Internet access and WAN circuits • Consumables (user devices, network devices, projectors) • Software • Replacement computers and servers • Staff Development • Current staff budget: $227,000 • Tech Director, Network Engineer, Technician (salary and fringe) • Proposed operational budget: $430,000 • Increase of $155,000 annually, beginning 2012-2013 • Would cover cost of wireless, new computers, added portable devices • Proposed staff budget: $269,000 • Increase of $42,000 annually • Would cover cost of 1 FTE “Tech 1” position (salary and fringe)

  22. Questions?

Recommend


More recommend