broadband qos test results illustration
play

Broadband QoS Test Results Illustration Chanuka Wattegama LIRNEasia - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Broadband QoS Test Results Illustration Chanuka Wattegama LIRNEasia Expert Forum on ICT Sector Indicators and Benchmark Regulation for SAARC Regulatory Authorities, Changi Village, Singapore June 15, 2008 Packages tested Advertised Advertised


  1. Broadband QoS Test Results Illustration Chanuka Wattegama LIRNEasia Expert Forum on ICT Sector Indicators and Benchmark Regulation for SAARC Regulatory Authorities, Changi Village, Singapore June 15, 2008

  2. Packages tested Advertised Advertised Download Upload S peed S peed India Airtel 512 kbps 512 kbps BSNL - Business 2 Mbps 256 kbps BSNL - Home 2 Mbps 256 kbps Hathway 256 kbps 256 kbps Sri Lanka Dialog 2 Mbps 512 kbps SLT - Business 2 Mbps 512 kbps SLT - Home 512 kbps 128 kbps Singapore StarHub* 1 Mbps 256 kbps * Partial testing

  3. Test Results � Throughput (Download speed/ Upload speed) Business Packages performance in • IS P domain • Local domain • International level S ri Lanka vs. India/ S ingapore performance Business vs. Home performance � Delay metrics (RTT/ j itter) � Loss metrics (Packet Loss)

  4. Test Results Throughput ‐ Download speed

  5. Download speed (Business Packages): Relatively healthy in IS P domain… 2 Mbps > 75% ISP

  6. Download speed (Business Packages): … poor in Local domain 2 Mbps > 75% Local

  7. Download speed (Business Packages): … even poorer when accessing International sites 2 Mbps > 75% Int’l

  8. Download speed: India and S ri Lanka (IS P Domain): S ri Lanka performs slightly better > 75% ISP

  9. Download speed: India and S ri Lanka (Local Domain): India performs better > 75% Local

  10. Download speed: India and S ri Lanka (accessing International servers): India looks good > 75% Int’l

  11. Download speed S ri Lanka and S ingapore (accessing International servers): S ingapore wins > 75% Int’l

  12. Download speed (S LT Business vs. S LT Home packages): … in % terms, home is better than business

  13. Download speed (S LT Business vs. S LT Home packages): … and comparable in reaching international sites

  14. Test Results Throughput ‐ Upload speeds

  15. Upload speed (Business packages): S omewhat healthy in IS P domain 512 kbps > 75% ISP

  16. Upload speed (Business packages): … a bit down at Local Domain 512 kbps > 75% Local

  17. Upload speed (Business packages): … and poor in accessing International sites 512 kbps > 75% Int’l

  18. Upload speed S ri Lanka and S ingapore (accessing International sites): S ingapore wins > 75% Int’l

  19. Upload speed (S LT Business vs. S LT Home packages): … here too in % , home is better than business, but not in actual speeds (aprox 100 kpbs) (aprox 200 kpbs)

  20. Test Results Jitter and Packet Loss

  21. Jitter : S ometimes not enough quality for video/ high quality audio (<+10ms) but satisfactory for other apps

  22. Packet Loss : Most of the times, but not always, within acceptable limits (5% ) ISP –Week Day Local –Week Day INT –Week Day ISP –Weekend Local –Weekend INT –Weekend

  23. Where is the bottleneck?

  24. Accessing www.lankacom.net through S LT (2M/ 512k) 170 ms 65 ms 25 ms 10 ms Local NB: All IP addresses are within SL (www.whois.net)

  25. Accessing www.yahoo.com through S LT (2M/ 512k) 170 ms 65 ms 25 ms 10 ms Int’l NB: Upto 5 th hop IP addresses are within SL (www.whois.net)

  26. What’ s next? o A decentralised approach based on ‘ Volunteer Computing’ * o Automating the manual test process (otherwise too resource consuming and cumbersome) o Need to conduct tests from different point (take Last Mile issues into account) o A software application that tests with the minimal involvement from the user o Volunteers report test results to a web site that stored and presents on-line QoS data * Volunteer computing is a type of distributed computing in which computer owners donate their computing resources (such as processing power and storage) to one or more "projects". It is distinct from Grid computing, which involves sharing of managed computing resources within and between organizations.

  27. Example: www.internetpulse.com

  28. Thank You! wattegama@ lirne.net www.lirneasia.net Thanks to LIRNE asia team, Prof. Timothy Gonsalves and team, Ranga Kamaladasa, S riganesh Lokanathan, S anj ana Hattotuwa, S anath S iriwardena and all who contributed ideas/ opinions in online discussions at LIRNEasia blog.

Recommend


More recommend