board end measures college board monitoring presentation
play

Board End Measures College Board Monitoring Presentation Board End - PDF document

Board End Measures College Board Monitoring Presentation Board End #1: Educational and Career Goal Success All students achieve the learning necessary to be successful in their educational and career goals. Board End #1, Outcome 1


  1. Board End Measures – College Board Monitoring Presentation Board End #1: Educational and Career Goal Success – All students achieve the learning necessary to be successful in their educational and career goals. Board End #1, Outcome 1 – Results Course Success Measure Definition: Percentage of all courses attempted by degree credit students per year receiving a grade of “C” or better. Included in this measure are the following degree types: Occupational Associate, Liberal Arts Transfer, Less-Than-One-Year, One-Year and Two-Year Technical Diploma and Apprenticeship. Measure: Comments: !"#$%&'(#))&%%*'+,,'-&.$&&/!$&012'(2#0&32%' This chart shows the most recent 5- year trend in both course success (% +-%& C or higher) and a higher level of !'#)%&!!#'%& !"#'%& !"#!%& !"#(%& !"#$%& success (% B or higher). The course !"%& success rate for all degree credit !*#(%& students has fluctuated within a range ./00122&3%& !)#$%& of .9 percentage points since 2008. !-%& 45516&71809:;6<& From 2011 to 2012 this measure =>??@1&71809:;6<& increased to its highest level in the '"%& ABC16&71809:;6<& five-year period. ./00122&7%& ",#$%& ",#$%& ",#$%& "+#*%& '-%& "!#+%& Annual degree credit enrollment increased from 2008 to 2012 by 9.4%, ""%& nearly 2,000 students, but was below $--+& $--,& $-)-& $-))& $-)$& the peak seen in 2011. Additional Information: Benchmark: National Community !""#$%&'()*((&+*(,-.&/.#,(".&0($,12#".& College Benchmark Project (NCCBP) - Form 7 Credit Course Success. !'*$***!! !"&$*++!! !"'$%()!! !"'$#*,!! v Upper Benchmark: 77.6% !"#$&'"!! !"#$#"%!! v Middle Benchmark: 74.3% !"*$***!! v Lower Benchmark: 71.2% !#*$***!! !-!!!! "**,! "**)! "*#*! "*##! "*#"! Source: Madison College Data warehouse Basis for Rating: Course Success Cube. The yellow-green rating is based on National Community College Benchmark (NCCBP) rating standards. Red is 25 th percentile and For more information regarding these below; Yellow is between 25 th and 50 th percentiles; yellow-green is results please contact Terry Webb, between the 51 st and 75 th percentile; green is 76 th percentile and Provost at (608) 246-6270. above. The 2012 76.1% success percentage is in the 63 rd percentile placing it in the yellow-green range. Board End #1: All students achieve the learning necessary to be successful in their educational and career goals. September, 2012 1

  2. Board End Measures – College Board Monitoring Presentation Board End #1, Outcome 2 – Results Graduation Measure Definition: 3-Year Graduation Rate – graduation rate of first-time full-time and part-time students entering in the fall semester. Comments: !"#$%&'%()&"*+","-)%$."/"0'11/2*3)" This measure is based on the National Community College Benchmark $"%& 2.34567&86//9:9& Project (NCCBP) Form 2 Completion -;//0<=9>&-4?5@0<=9& measure. It tracks 3-year graduation ("%& 47&-.//& rates for entering full-time, first-time ABB9?&C97DE=.?F& !"%& and part-time, first-time student '+#$%& cohorts. '"%& '"#'%& 2433/9&C97DE=.?F& ,!#$%& In the most recent cohort year, ,"%& Madison College is slightly below the !"#$%& '(#)%& '*#)%& upper benchmark for full-time students, "%& G6H9?&C97DE=.?F& and substantially above the upper -.//&'""*0"+& -.//&'""+0")& -.//&'"")0"1& benchmark for part-time students. The number of students in first time !"#$%&'%()&"*+","-)%$."/"0%$(/1*2)" full-time and part-time cohorts is shown on the bottom chart. The )$%& entering first-time, full-time cohort grew 2.34567&86//9:9& ;.<=0>?9@&-4<5=0>?9& by 19 students (1.3%) while the +$%& 47&-.//& entering first-time, part-time cohort ABB9<&C97DE?.<F& grew by 60 students (7.1%). ,$%& !"#$%& !*#"%& !$%& 2433/9&C97DE?.<F& '(#)%& ''#!%& '$%& *#)%& +#!%& G6H9<&C97DE?.<F& $%& -.//&!$$*0$"& -.//&!$$"0$1& -.//&!$$10$(& !"#$%&'"()*+,%)#",-*./0/#%* !'#***!! !"#,**!! !"#&&$!! !"#&'&!! !"#$%"!! -1234!5167!-5! !"#***!! -1234!5167!85! !)*'!! !(&'!! !(")!! !,**!! !+!!!! -.//!'**%+*0! -.//!'**0+*(! -.//!'**(+*)! Board End #1: All students achieve the learning necessary to be successful in their educational and career goals. September, 2012 2

  3. Board End Measures – College Board Monitoring Presentation Full-Time: 73 rd percentile Sources: 1. IRE custom SAS program running on extracted cohort information. 2. Madison College Data Warehouse Part-Time: 94 th percentile FTE & Enrollment Cube. Benchmark Source: 1. NCCBP: Form 2: 3-year Cohort Graduation Rate for Entering Full- Basis for Rating: Time and Part-Time students. Percentile ranking based on benchmarks as with previous measure. For more information regarding these results please contact Terry Webb, Provost at (608) 246-6270. Board End #1: All students achieve the learning necessary to be successful in their educational and career goals. September, 2012 3

  4. Board End Measures – College Board Monitoring Presentation Board End #1, Outcome 3 – Results Overall Student Success Measure Definitions: § 3-Year Cohort Graduation Rate + Transfer Rate + Retention Rate. Total of the graduation rate, transfer rate and retention rate of first-time students entering in the fall semester, 3 years after first enrollment - excludes students in programs less than 1 year in length and apprenticeships (no benchmarks available); § Cohort 3-year percent of all first-time, full-time students and first-time part-time students; § Two re-enrollment measures of all degree credit students: 1. Fall to Spring Persistence. 2. Fall to Fall Retention. Comments: Cohort year information on each chart shows the year !"#$""%&$"'()%*)+'",)%*+--"..%/%0% that students first took a Madison College degree /1"2$% credit class. Students are followed for 3 years and -*%& their success in graduation, retention, or transfer is '!#"%& "$#'%& "-#!%& "-#$%& ")#-%& '*%& recorded. Combining the results for a student cohort’s +*#!%& !$#"%& !)#'%& !)#!%& !)#)%& graduation, transfer and retention rates reveals the ,*%& ++#(%& ++#+%& +,#-%& +,#+%& ++#)%& overall student success of that cohort. 3-Year total +*%& student success decreased from 61.5% to 58.9% in !$#*%& !$#!%& !'#(%& !)#(%& !"#$%& *%& the most recent cohort year. ./00&+**,1*"& ./00&+**"1*'& ./00&+**'1*)& ./00&+**)1*-& ./00&+**-1*$& 23456573893& :4/;</=>8& ?4/85@34& Benchmark Notes: • Useful benchmarks are not available to take into Data Notes: account all 3 outcomes simultaneously while tracking • The above chart includes students in programs of 1 year or on an entering cohort basis. Alternative 3-year longer. Short-term program enrollees in programs such as graduate, transfer, retention, and persistence measures Certified Nursing Assistant and the short-term EMT programs are excluded. with associated benchmarks are presented in the Since we are following students for 3 years, the most • following 4 charts. recent retention, graduation, and transfer outcome information available is for the 2008-09 cohort. The 2 charts below combine graduation and transfer outcomes for entering degree-seeking, first-time, full-time and first time, part-time student cohorts. Both full-time and part-time cohorts showed substantial increases in the % Graduated or Transferred measure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oard End #1: All students achieve the learning necessary to be successful in their educational and career goals. September, 2012 4

Recommend


More recommend