Benchmarking case for validation of draping software K. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Benchmarking case for validation of draping software K. Vanclooster, S.V. Lomov and I.Verpoest K.U. Leuven - Department of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering Downloaded from http://www.mtm.kuleuven.ac.be/Research/C2/poly/index.htm

Benchmarking case for validation of draping software � Thermoforming of woven reinforced composite on “salami” shaped mould using different blank orientations Downloaded from http://www.mtm.kuleuven.ac.be/Research/C2/poly/index.htm

Benchmarking case for validation of draping software � Measurement of the local shear profile of the formed composite Downloaded from http://www.mtm.kuleuven.ac.be/Research/C2/poly/index.htm

Benchmarking case for validation of draping software � Compare shear angle measurements with kinematic mapping and FEM approach � Kinematic Large discrepancy Downloaded from http://www.mtm.kuleuven.ac.be/Research/C2/poly/index.htm

Benchmarking case for validation of draping software � FEM-simulation Downloaded from http://www.mtm.kuleuven.ac.be/Research/C2/poly/index.htm

Benchmarking case for validation of draping software � The mapping approach severely fails in predicting the fiber reorientation that occurs during forming. � The mechanical simulation approach gives a fairly good prediction of the fiber reorientation and seems the most promising technique in having good draping simulations. � The test results present a simple and distinctive benchmark for validation of any draping software Downloaded from http://www.mtm.kuleuven.ac.be/Research/C2/poly/index.htm