an exploration into comparing
play

An Exploration into Comparing WBCs and their Performance May 1, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

An Exploration into Comparing WBCs and their Performance May 1, 2015 Prepared by students of Carnegie Mellons Heinz College of Public Policy: Roxanna Cisneros, Nichole Hoeflich, John Lira, Cory Misley, Yalan Qin & Natalie Sabadish E-1


  1. An Exploration into Comparing WBCs and their Performance May 1, 2015 Prepared by students of Carnegie Mellon’s Heinz College of Public Policy: Roxanna Cisneros, Nichole Hoeflich, John Lira, Cory Misley, Yalan Qin & Natalie Sabadish E-1

  2. AGENDA Introductions Background Project Objectives Project Methodology Results Recommendations E-2

  3. TEAM MEMBERS Natalie Sabadish Nichole Hoeflich Cory Misley Roxanna Cisneros John Lira Yalan Qin E-3

  4. ADVISORY BOARD MEMBERS Thu Stubbs Dr. Monique Morrissey CEO and Owner Economist Technology Science Economic Policy Corporation Institute Marshall Contino Eleanor “Ellie” Thornton Antonella Pianalto President and CEO Program Manager Acting Executive Director Booz Allen Hamilton Visionary Consulting Partners, Association of Women’s Business LLC Centers E-4

  5. BACKGROUND The Clients: Office of Women’s Business Ownership (OWBO) National Women’s Business Council (NWBC ) E-5

  6. BACKGROUND  105 Women’s Business Centers (WBCs)  WBCs provide training and counseling for entrepreneurs and women business owners to support them in starting and growing small businesses. E-6

  7. PROJECT OBJECTIVES The Research Questions  How can the SBA’s OWBO & NWBC define performance at WBCs?  What factors contribute to the performance of WBCs focusing on the interactions with other local organizations, resources & economic conditions? E-7

  8. PROJECT OBJECTIVES Project Goals  To achieve a better understanding of the internal and external factors that influence the capabilities and performance of WBCs;  To provide guidance that will assist OWBO in future decision making for WBCs regarding grant language, support offered to new WBCs, and additional services for existing WBCs. E-8

  9. PROJECT METHODOLOGY E-9

  10. PROJECT METHODOLOGY DATA COLLECTION • Source : SBA’s Office of Women’s Business Ownership (OWBO) • Data Collected : contact information, demographic information, and performance measures. Internal Data Sources • Source : a variety of public sources, mostly federal government agencies • Data Collected : unemployment rate, employment, small business tax climate, median income, education level, population by gender, local colleges/universities, existence of other business assistance programs, External local chambers of commerce, access to capital, fair market rent, family budget Data Sources • Source : WBC Directors Survey & Interviews • Data Collected : service population, performance measures, basic WBC information; WBC history, host Primary structure & cohort characteristics, program services, funding, resource partnerships Data Sources E-10

  11. PROJECT METHODOLOGY DATA CHALLENGES • Missing values • Inconsistent reporting of internal performance measures Internal Data • Limited to larger geographic areas • Variable data years External Data • Inconsistent and incomplete survey responses • Wide range of responses to open-ended questions Primary Data E-11

  12. DATABASE SCREENSHOTS E-12

  13. DATABASE SCREENSHOTS E-13

  14. PROJECT METHODOLOGY DATA ANALYSIS Population Cohort Survey Interview Analysis Identification Results Spotlights E-14

  15. WBC POPULATION ANALYSIS 1,400 Total Clients Served by Area type 1,380 Overall average  A majority of WBCs serve urban 1,350 populations; 1,287 1,300  WBCs serving urban populations 1,250 have a higher average of total clients served 1,198 1,200 1,183 Average Age of 90.1% WBCs have a 1,150 WBCs Facebook account 14 Years old 1,100 1,050 Urban Mixed Populations Suburban Rural Source: SBA OWBO E-15

  16. WBC POPULATION ANALYSIS Average Total Clients Seen by Average Total Clients Seen by Tenure of WBC directors Experience of WBC directors tenure 2,000 60% Average clients served 1,600 50% Average clients served WBC director experience 47.5% 1,456 1774 1,800 WBC director tenure 45% 1,400 50% 49.2% 1,600 40% 1438 1,200 1339 1,400 35% 40% 953 1,000 1,200 1132 30% 877 25.4% 1,000 30% 800 25% 20% 800 559 600 18.6% 20.3% 20% 15% 600 18.6% 400 10% 400 11.9% 10% 5.1% 161 200 5% 200 3.4% 0 0% 0 0% Less than one year 1-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 15 or more years 1-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 15 or more years E-16 Source: Survey results Source: SBA OWBO and Survey results

  17. WBC POPULATION ANALYSIS Technical Services Offered Training Courses Offered Webinars 17.4% Government Contracting Assistance 73.5% Online training and counseling 15.1% Mentoring program 64.3% 12.8% Skype counseling Microloans 45.9% 11.6% Software and technology 8.1% Web design ENCORE/Senior women 37.8% Social media 8.1% International trade/ export 33.7% GoToMeeting 7.0% 5.8% QuickBooks workshops Programs for youth/ young women 25.5% 4.7% Ed2Go Veteran-specific programs 24.5% 4.7% Google applications Manufacturing 18.4% Excel 3.5% 20% 18% 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Source: SBA OWBO Source: SBA OWBO E-17

  18. COHORT IDENTIFICATION Factor Selection Graph & Identify Factor Analysis Outliers Performance Composite Six Cohorts Index E-18

  19. COHORT IDENTIFICATION Step 1: Factor Selection: Similar WBCs that share characteristics of two to three of chosen factors. Step 2: Factor Analysis: Hosted vs. Stand-Alone; Unemployment Rate; Population; Age of WBC Step 3: Six Cohorts: E-19

  20. E-20

  21. COHORT IDENTIFICATION Step 4: Performance Composite Index E-21

  22. COHORT IDENTIFICATION Step 5: Graph and Identify Outliers E-22

  23. SURVEY RESULTS Non-Funding Resources Number of Share of total Resource mentions mentions Technology and online support 27 35.1% Training and curriculum for clients 23 29.9% Marketing and promotion 16 20.8% Staff support and training for WBCs 15 19.5% Best practice and standardized resources for WBCs 13 16.9% Partnerships and collaboration 12 15.6% Source: Survey results E-23

  24. E-24

  25. SURVEY RESULTS Partnerships E-25

  26. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY PARTNERSHIPS National  Small Business Development Centers (SBDC)  SCORE  National Association of Women Business Owners (NAWBO) Local  Business improvement districts  Community development centers  Workforce development agencies  Economic development councils E-26

  27. INTERVIEW SPOTLIGHTS 1. BrightBridge Women’s Business Center Chattanooga, TN 2. Denver Women’s Business Center Denver, CO 3. Entrepreneurial Center University of Hartford Hartford, CT 4. Queens Women’s Business Center Queens, NY 5. WBC at Old Dominion University Norfolk, VA 6. Women Business Partners Program San Luis Obispo, CA 7. Wyoming Women’s Business Center Laramie, WY E-27

  28. INTERVIEW RESULTS  Data Collection • WBCs interpret and report data inconsistently • Only counts businesses started and jobs created that result from counseling • Difficult to use/time consuming, and doesn’t capture the full impact of their work  Association of Women’s Business Centers (AWBC) • In general, positive interactions with the AWBC and benefits their work • WBCs would welcome more interaction and networking opportunities  General Support • More support for new WBCs and WBC director transitions • Facilitate sharing of best practices E-28

  29. RECOMMENDATIONS Data Collection Strategies Performance Assessment Techniques Programmatic Changes E-29

  30. RECOMMENDATIONS Data Collection Strategies 1. Standardize data collection procedures and provide clarification of data reporting definitions and statistics. 2. Revise the EDMIS data collection tool in order to better capture the full impact of WBCs. 3. Track additional performance and demographic metrics. E-30

  31. RECOMMENDATIONS Performance Assessment Techniques 1. Implement the cohort identification process discussed in the report with other defining factors, potentially leading to an alternate comparison analysis. 2. Research alternative performance comparison frameworks to apply to the WBC network. 3. Incentivize WBCs to use more program evaluation techniques. E-31

  32. RECOMMENDATIONS Programmatic Changes 1. Expand resources and curriculum made available to new WBCs and during transitions between WBC directors. 2. Provide enriched opportunities for WBCs to engage in sharing best practices. 3. Offer a centralized database of automated templates and resources. 4. Increase technological software and hardware updates available to WBCs. E-32

  33. Q & A E-33

  34. CONCLUSION Project Deliverables:  Comprehensive database with summary sheet highlighting key information for each WBC  Raw survey data files on 81 survey respondents  Audio files of 7 calls with WBC directors  A series of recommendations to provide guidance on future decision making for WBC grant language, support offered to new WBCs, and adjustments to resources provided to existing WBCs E-34

  35. THANK YOU! E-35

Recommend


More recommend