aging water infrastructure research program sab
play

Aging Water Infrastructure Research Program SAB Consultation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Aging Water Infrastructure Research Program SAB Consultation Rehabilitation of Wastewater Collection and Water Distribution Systems Dr. Ari Selvakumar Water Supply and Water Resources Division Photo image area measures 2 H x 6.93 W and can be


  1. Aging Water Infrastructure Research Program SAB Consultation Rehabilitation of Wastewater Collection and Water Distribution Systems Dr. Ari Selvakumar Water Supply and Water Resources Division Photo image area measures 2 H x 6.93 W and can be masked by a ” ” collage strip of one, two or three images. The photo image area is located 3.19 from left and 3.81 from top of page. ” ” Each image used in collage should be reduced or cropped to a maximum of 2 high, stroked with a 1.5 pt white frame and positioned edge to edge with ” - - accompanying images. Office of Research and Development July 21, 2009 National Risk Management Research Laboratory

  2. Rehabilitation Definition: Rehabilitation includes repair, renewal, and replacement of pipes and components (pump stations, manholes, etc.) to return the system to near-original condition and performance. Research Area Goals: To accelerate the application of innovative ƒ technologies for cost-effective rehabilitation/replacement of aging/failing drinking water distribution and wastewater collection systems. To conduct full-scale demonstrations of promising ƒ technologies that will gather reliable cost and performance data. Office of Research and Development 1 National Risk Management Research Laboratory

  3. Project Strategies • Identify, characterize, and document the SOT at the global level, including critical data and capability gaps, for the rehabilitation of DW and WW conveyance systems. • Demonstrate and evaluate promising innovative technologies and decision-support systems under controlled-conditions and at sites of opportunity. Office of Research and Development 2 National Risk Management Research Laboratory

  4. Tasks Stakeholder Members • Establish Stakeholder Group • Steve Allbee - EPA Office of Water • Conduct Technology Forum • Dr. Daniel Woltering - WERF • Develop State-of-the-Technology Reports • Dr. Jian Zhang - WRF • John Hemphill - NASTT • Develop Protocols/Metrics for • Duncan Rose - GHD Consulting, Inc. Demonstrations • Dr. David Hughes - American Water • John Griffin, Jr. - City of Atlanta • Develop Site Selection Criteria for Research Partners Demonstrations • Field Demonstration of at Least Two • Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, OH Technologies • Trenchless Technology Center, • Develop Rehabilitation vs. Replacement Louisiana Tech. (Dr. Ray Sterling) Decision Support Strategies • Jason Consultants • Virginia Tech University (Dr. Sunil Sinha) Office of Research and Development 3 National Risk Management Research Laboratory

  5. International Forum Purpose: Develop inventory of rehabilitation technologies and identify candidate technologies for demonstration. Forum Highlights • Need decision-support systems: − Rehabilitation methods/materials − Rehabilitation vs. replacement • Lack of understanding of rehabilitation capabilities; • 31 Invited Experts need rational/uniform design approach • 21 Presentations • Proprietary systems, procedures, materials • Group Discussions • Need long-term performance/cost data • Better technologies for water distribution pipes • Vendor & Utility • EPA clearing house for performance/cost data Roundtable Discussion • Retrospective evaluation of rehabilitation technologies Office of Research and Development 4 National Risk Management Research Laboratory

  6. Retrospective Evaluation of Lining Technologies • Develop protocols for the forensic evaluation of existing rehabilitation systems. • Demonstrate protocols on selected case studies. • Encourage municipalities to examine their rehabilitated systems using the protocols. • Develop/provide database on performance. Office of Research and Development 5 National Risk Management Research Laboratory

  7. Next Steps 1. Selection of Technologies for Demonstration • Wastewater: CIPP with UV ‐ cured (Glass fiber & polyester tube impregnated with polyester or vinylester resin & UV cured) • Water: CIPP with hot water or steam cured (Aqualiner, Aquapipe, InSitu Main) 2. Selection of Potential Demonstration Sites • Columbus, OH • Indianapolis, IN • Omaha, NE 3. Preparation for Demonstration • QAPP • Protocols/Metrics 4. Demonstration Trials • Site Selection Criteria Office of Research and Development 6 6 6 National Risk Management Research Laboratory

  8. Planned Outputs • State of the technology reports on State of Technology Report rehabilitation of: − Wastewater collection pipes & service laterals − Force Mains − Water distribution pipes & service lines • Report on initial field demonstrations • Rehabilitation vs. replacement decision approach • Report on retrospective evaluation of lining • Journal articles EPA/600/X-09/048 Office of Research and Development 7 National Risk Management Research Laboratory

  9. ETV Program Stakeholder Members • NSF International • NASSCO • WRF ƒ Established Infrastructure Stakeholders Group. • University of Houston ƒ • Springfield Water/Sewer Comm Evaluating coatings & grouting materials for • Inland Water Pollution Control rehabilitating stormwater & wastewater • Black & Veatch, Hydroqual infrastructure. • Ultraliner ƒ • Virginia Public Works Equip. Six vendors participating at University of Houston’s • Prime Resins Center for Innovative Grouting Materials and • Cues, Inc. Technology. ƒ Verification Reports in 2010 & 2011. Office of Research and Development 8 National Risk Management Research Laboratory

  10. Summary ƒ Water & sewer systems are critical to the effective functioning & environmental health of our cities. ƒ Delay in addressing the problems only increases total costs. ƒ Rehabilitation technologies are available & continue to be developed. ƒ International technology transfer, design, & performance data can improve the cost-effectiveness of rehabilitation efforts. ƒ This can translate into billions of dollars saved. Office of Research and Development 9 National Risk Management Research Laboratory

  11. Thank You! Questions/Comments? Office of Research and Development 10 National Risk Management Research Laboratory

Recommend


More recommend