accretion buoyancy and chaos abcs of galaxy formation
play

Accretion, Buoyancy, and Chaos: ABCs of Galaxy Formation Ben Keller - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Accretion, Buoyancy, and Chaos: ABCs of Galaxy Formation Ben Keller Universitt Heidelberg Diederik Kruijssen, James Wadsley, Samantha Benincasa, Hugh Couchman, Liang Wang Outfmows, Buoyancy, and Chaos: OBCs of Galaxy Formation Ben Keller


  1. Accretion, Buoyancy, and Chaos: ABCs of Galaxy Formation Ben Keller Universität Heidelberg Diederik Kruijssen, James Wadsley, Samantha Benincasa, Hugh Couchman, Liang Wang

  2. Outfmows, Buoyancy, and Chaos: OBCs of Galaxy Formation Ben Keller Universität Heidelberg Diederik Kruijssen, James Wadsley, Samantha Benincasa, Hugh Couchman, Liang Wang

  3. MUGS2: 18 L* Galaxies ● Cosmological zoom-in simulations, run using GASOLINE2 (Wadsley+ 2017), in a WMAP3 cosmology ● Initial conditions identical to MUGS (Stinson+ 2010), run with “classic” SPH and blast-wave feedback ● Virial Masses range from 3.7x10 11 to 2.1x10 12 M sun ● Variety of merger histories, spin parameters ● 320pc softening, baryon mass resolution of 2.2x10 5 M sun Keller+ 2016

  4. MUGS2: 18 L* Galaxies Keller+ 2016

  5. Feedback Models Matter! ● 4 test cases: ● g1536 – No Feedback – 8x10 11 M sun virial mass – Blastwave (Stinson+ 2006) – Last major merger at z=4 feedback – Equal SN energy for Blastwave – Superbubble Feedback and Superbubble – Superbubble Feedback 2X Energy – Details in Keller+ 2015 Keller+ 2015

  6. Superbubble Feedback ● Hot bubble is heated by multiple SN ● As bubble expands, forms a cold & radiative shell ● Shell is evaporated by thermal conduction ∂ M B ∂ t = 4 πμ 5 / 2 A B κ 0 T 25 k B Keller+ 2014

  7. Correct Stellar Mass, Small Bulge Stellar Mass Halo Mass Flat rotation curve == no major bulge component Stellar Mass Evolution (B/T ratio of 0.09 vs. 0.46, Matches Behroozi+ 2012 MW B/T ~0.14) abundance matching Keller+ 2015

  8. Superbubbles drive outfmows well Keller+ 2015

  9. High-z outfmows prevent bulges, preserve disks Keller+ 2015

  10. High-z outfmows prevent bulges, preserve disks Disk Forming Gas Bulge Forming Gas Keller+ 2015

  11. Can Supernovae do it all? Moster+ 2010

  12. Can Supernovae do it all? Moster+ 2010

  13. Can Supernovae do it all? Moster+ 2010

  14. Can Supernovae do it all? Stellar Mass (10 11 M sun ) Halo Mass (10 12 M sun ) Answer: No! Keller+ 2016

  15. Mass loading has universal scaling ● Mass-loading begins to fall from ~10 when disc is Mass Loading ~10 10 M sun , halo is ~2x10 11 M sun to << 1 in halos above ~10 12 M sun ● SDSS observations fjnd powerful AGN kick in here! Disc Mass ● Dubois+ 2015 simulations found AGN regulation began at 280 km/s bulge v esc at high z Keller+ 2016

  16. How Gas Moves Through the CGM ● Do outfmows escape the halo? – Wind vs. Fountain ● Are they driven by energy, momentum, or something else? ● How does accreted material interact with outfmowing material?

  17. What Governs CGM Flow? ● Physics at work ● Critical Timescales – Energy/Momentum – Cooling t cool injected by FB – Gravitational Freefall t f – Gravity/Accretion Shock – Brunt-Väisälä t buouy – Hydrodynamic Drag – Radiative Cooling – Buoyancy Feedback Cooling ● Buoyancy can add OR remove radial momentum! Drag Gravity

  18. What Governs CGM Flow? ● Physics at work ● Critical Timescales – Energy/Momentum – Cooling t cool injected by FB – Gravitational Freefall t f – Gravity/Accretion Shock – Brunt-Väisälä t buouy – Hydrodynamic Drag – Radiative Cooling – Buoyancy ● Buoyancy can add OR remove radial momentum!

  19. Buoyancy is all about Entropy! “Entropy” Entropy − 2 / 3 Δ S =Δ ln ( K ) K = k B T n Brünt-Väisälä Frequency Schwarzchild Criterion ω= √ ∂ S 3 ∂ r > 0 5 ∇ ϕ∇ S Keller+ 2018b, in prep

  20. Buoyancy determines fmow direction Keller+ 2018b, in prep

  21. Entropy-Driven Fountains Keller+ 2018b, in prep

  22. EoM for Entropy-Driven Fountains Drag Buoyancy r =∇ ϕ ¨ Gravity Keller+ 2018b, in prep

  23. Can We Derive the Entropy of a SB? Superbubble Density − 3 L 38 − 3 cm 6 / 35 n 0 19 / 35 t 7 − 22 / 35 n SB = 9.6 ∘ 10 Superbubble Temperature Superbubble Radius T SB = 10 μ m p 1 / 5 n 0 − 1 / 5 t 7 3 / 5 Lt R SB = 267 pc L 38 33 k B m SB Weaver+ 1977, Mac Low & McCray 1988

  24. Superbubble Entropy Entropy at breakout (R~h) 26 / 36 h 2 / 63 n 0 − 14 / 63 2 ( K SB = 5.84 keV cm 267 pc ) L 38 Halo Entropy 2 ( 12 M sun ) 2 / 3 M vir K vir = 30.06 keV cm 10 Keller+ 2018b, in prep

  25. Integrating the Buoyant EoM

  26. Buoyant Outfmows Recycle Slowly! Entropy-Driven Energy-Driven Keller+ 2018b, in prep

  27. Buoyancy determines recycling time

  28. A “Reproducibility Crisis” In Numerical Astrophysics? Monya Baker, Nature News, 2016

  29. How Sensitive Are Galaxy Properties to Small Perturbations? ● N-Body Chaos ● Infjnitesimal Initial Condition Perturbations ● Random Number Generator seeds ● Poisson Noise ● Floating Point Roundof

  30. Chaos Rules Everything Around Me Laskar & Gastineau 2009

  31. Chaos is Important in Protoplanetary Discs: Why Not Galactic Discs? Hofgmann+ 2017

  32. Chaos is Universal! Isolated Dwarf Galaxy Cosmological MW Zoom Difgerence in Stellar Mass Between Runs ● All codes ● All subgrid feedback models ● All initial conditions ● See also Genel+ 2018 Keller+ 2018a, submitted

  33. Keller+ 2018a, submitted

  34. Keller+ 2018a, submitted

  35. Feedback & Gas Exhaustion Constrain Stochasticity No Feedback: Feedback: Gas Exhaustion Self-Regulation Variance in Stellar Mass Time Keller+ 2018a, submitted

  36. Starbursts & Mergers Pump Chaos Merger Isolated/ Keller+ 2018a, submitted

  37. T emporal ~ Numerical Stochasticity Stellar Surface Density Keller+ 2018a, submitted

  38. T emporal ~ Numerical Stochasticity Run-to-Run Step-to-Step Variation Variation Keller+ 2018a, submitted

  39. What does “simulation” mean? Model 1 Model 2 n o i t a l u Final m i Initial S State Conditions Confjguration Space Keller+ 2018a, submitted

  40. What does “simulation” mean? Model 1 Model 2 n o i Final t a l u State a m i Initial S Conditions Final State b Confjguration Space Keller+ 2018a, submitted

  41. What does “simulation” mean? Keller+ 2018a, submitted

  42. What does “simulation” mean? Keller+ 2018a, submitted

  43. Read My Papers Here :) Conclusions ● Highly mass-loaded outfmows, especially at high-z, are essential to forming realistic L* galaxies – These outfmows cannot be driven by SN alone in halos more massive than 10 12 M sun ● Entropy-driven winds, driven by buoyancy, behave quite diferently than ballistic outfmows – Gentle acceleration, low velocities – Long recycling times – Halo entropy exceeds superbubble entropy near 10 12 M sun , halting outfmows ● Galaxy evolution involves chaotic physics: small-scale stochasticity can pump large-scale changes

Recommend


More recommend