A presentation by Sakshi Kalani
Companion animals Mental health “A state of well-being” (WHO, 2011) Resilience/flourishing: “[Being able to] cope with the normal stresses of life” (WHO, 2011) Broad concept
What is already known Literature Current events
Physiological health: • Dogs lower blood pressure and heart rate (relaxation) • Adults and small children • Dog owner are more likely to be physically active Mental health: Social health: • Cats improve depressed • Animals help build moods rapport during therapy What • Animals reduce depression • Animal improve social in HIV patients we interaction of older adults know
The quality of evidence is weak! Lack of RCTs and longitudinal studies Small sample sizes (limited generalisability) Very few studies are replicated Uncontrolled confounding variables Very few studies explore mental health benefits of companion animals for young people
Introduction of puppy rooms to relieve exam stress "Obviously puppies are really cool because animals de-stress you” (Fairfax Media, 2013)
Is there a relationship? If yes, then what does this relationship look like? Is this relationship stronger for some animals than others? Does the time spent with the animal account for variance in mental health? What are the benefits and harms interacting with a companion animal?
My research paradigm Objectivism (epistemology) Post-positivism (theoretical perspective) Quantitative survey research (methodology)
Sampling method: Convenience sampling ▪ All secondary schools in Auckland were emailed and invited to participate in the research ▪ The study was advertised in newsletters, notices and during assemblies to year 13 students
Demographic information WHOQQOL-BREF Formed a new scale with questions related to human-animal interaction Information about the companion animal Reasons for having the companion animal Activities carried out Positives and negatives
Summary statistics 8 Auckland schools and 69 students participated 40 females and 21 males Average age was 17 years Most common pets were cats and dogs
Students with and without a companion animals scored similarly on the four WHOQOL domains: Physical Social Environmental Mental Relationships with each animal are yet to be assessed
Students with companion animals have similar mental health to those without companion animals
STRENGTHS LIMITATIONS WHOQOL-BREF Small sample size Helps control confounding Limited generalisability to factors such as physical, social students in New Zealand and environmental health
Future studies should have large sample size Intervention studies should be carried out
Recommend
More recommend