a flavour of
play

...a flavour of ... Themis Bowcock 2 About our Liverpool group ... - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

...a flavour of ... Themis Bowcock 2 About our Liverpool group ... Built the LHCb Vertex Detector Core enabler of the LHCb B-measurements Our primary interest has been EW (W,Z production in forward region) Top (first results due in note next


  1. ...a flavour of ... Themis Bowcock

  2. 2 About our Liverpool group ... Built the LHCb Vertex Detector Core enabler of the LHCb B-measurements Our primary interest has been EW (W,Z production in forward region) Top (first results due in note next few weeks) Single Top Gateway Higgs Exotics 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  3. 3 NP in Quark Flavour (LHCb) Going ¡to ¡talk ¡about ¡B’s... You; balance against other topics and choices of where to do physics... 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  4. 4 Status of Searches No significant sign of NP at the LHC beyond the Higgs SUSY > 1TeV Increaseing (slowly) with luminosity and energy Before LHC, expectations were that “naturally” ¡the ¡masses ¡of ¡the ¡new ¡ particles would have to be light in order to reduce the “fine ¡tuning” ¡of ¡ the EW energy scale. naturalness->anthropic 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  5. 5 Existing Facilities Generally Lepton colliders (known cm). Elegant for neutrals and missing components Hadron colliders (large cross-sections) 1/fb at 7TeV at LHCb is equivalent to (1-5)/ab at the B-factories before tagging 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  6. 6 Indirect Search Method Discovery ¡through ¡“loops” Quantum interferometry smoking guns (rare decays) Part of long standing programme of precision measurement of FCNC 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  7. 7 CKM What accuracy do we need to know these numbers? CP phases A=0.81 ± 0.02 λ= ¡0.225 ± 0.001 Wolfenstein Parameterization 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  8. 8 Processes CKM Order in λ elements Decay Modes 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  9. 9 CP Violation/Angles In the limit theory as well as measurement limit NPdiscovery Trees Loops 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  10. Trees and Loops 10/29/2012 T. Bowcock - SPCS2011 10

  11. Trees and Loops 10/29/2012 T. Bowcock - SPCS2011 11

  12. Trees and Loops 10/29/2012 T. Bowcock - SPCS2011 12

  13. 13 � F=1, Trees (amplitudes) V ub at B-factories using inclusive or exclusive methods show a discrepancy at the 2-3 σ level: V ub (incl.)~1.3V ub (excl.). BR(B→ � ν) BaBar, Belle ( � , D*) NA62 has measured (2011) the ratio K → ¡ eν /K → ¡ μν =2.487 ± 0.013 in agreement with SM: 2.477 ± 0.001 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  14. 15 � F=1, Trees(phases) A ¡precise ¡determination ¡of ¡γ(O(1 ° )) is one of the highest priorities to be able to decide if there is new physics in B-> DK(*) Simplest analysis count B+/B- ratios 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  15. 16 � F=1 QCD Weak Higgs 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  16. 17 � F=1, QCD No significant discrepancy between b→ccs and s-penguin 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  17. 18 � F=1, EW EW Penguins Kaon Decays, NA62, KOTO, ORKA s>d (|V ts V td | α λ 5 ) Very rare decays Br ratios at the 10 -11 level. 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  18. 19 � F=1, EW b → s (|V tb V ts | ∝ λ 2 ) LHCb B → K* μμ is the golden mode to test new vector(-axial) couplings 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  19. 20 � F=1, Higgs Golden Modes: Rare Decay 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  20. 21 � F=1, Higgs FCNC family of measurements SM prediction B(K S0 → ¡μ + μ − ) = (5.0 ± 1.5) × 10 −12 μμ ¡ hypothesis Normalisation: ππ ¡ hypothesis We measure with 1.0 fb -1 : arXiv:1209.4029v2 0 → ¡μ + μ − ) < 11(9) × B(K S 10 −9 This limit is a factor 30 below the previous measurement ! 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  21. 22 � F=2, Box Diagrams B->u B->s c->u Need ¡“percent” ¡precision ¡to ¡disentangle ¡new ¡CP ¡phases ¡in ¡ Bd and Bs mixing, Bs->J/Psiphi etc 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  22. 23 � F=2 Also charm 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  23. 24 Mass Scales NP arXiv:1002.0900 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  24. 25 Reference ONLY 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  25. 26 LHCb Experiment Key Components A few recent results Upgrade Proposal (2018) Issues 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  26. Forward Physics @ LHC B decay vertices: � < 0.3rad Primary vertex: a few tracks many tracks ~50 Flavour 10 12 B /year � + Electro-weak B 0 b +... p p � - µ - � b B - D 0 � µ K/π ¡separation ¡ 10/29/2012 T. Bowcock - SPCS2011 27

  27. LHCb 1m long detector 21disks p p 10/29/2012 T. Bowcock - SPCS2011 28

  28. LHCb 10/29/2012 T. Bowcock - SPCS2011 29

  29. Key Requirements Vertexing & Tracking Trigger Specialized for B physics Adaptable Particle ID K/ π for P <100 GeV/c Tagging Get flavour of B at production 10/29/2012 T. Bowcock - SPCS2011 30

  30. 31 Performance 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  31. 32 Performance 32 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  32. 33 Efficiencies 99.94 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 99.98 98.71 99.72 100.00 99.27 80.00 82.00 84.00 86.00 88.00 90.00 92.00 94.00 96.00 98.00 100.00 % 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  33. 34 >2.2 fb -1 1380 bunches pA 770 pb -1 1380 bunches TS2 543 pb -1 10 days restart Luminosity in 2012 TS1 34 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  34. 35 35 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  35. 36 LHCb Trigger Scheme L0 H/W trigger 4 μs latency in FE electronics HLT S/W trigger Implemented in CPU farm Luminosity upgrade Event yields saturate Need full event information at L0 4.5 KHz 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  36. B Lifetimes(2011) B + → J/ ψ ¡ B 0 → J/ ψ K* 0 K + B s → J/ ψφ Λ b → J/ ψ ¡Λ 10/29/2012 T. Bowcock - SPCS2011 37

  37. B Lifetimes 10/29/2012

  38. 39 J/ψ, ¡ϒ(1S), ¡ϒ(2S) ¡and ¡ϒ(3S) ¡@ ¡8 ¡TeV Was 47 MeV/c 2 in 2011 Measure ¡the ¡J/ψ ¡from ¡ b quarks : 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  39. Example: Z Decay � �� Z Clean! 10/29/2012

  40. 41 Z → ¡ττ cross section LHCB-PAPER-2012-029 • Signal topologies and channels Observed : 124 o Bkg : 42 o Signal : 82 ATLAS : ATLAS-CONF-2012-006 ATLAS : Phys. Rev. D84 (2011) 1 CMS : JHEP 08 (2011) 117 41 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  41. Measurement of CP observables in B0→DK ∗ 0 with ¡D→K + K − 42 Two color suppressed decay modes � Interference � Sensitivity ¡to ¡γ ¡ LHCb-CONF-2012-024 B 0 B s B 0 B s 42 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  42. 43 � F =1, EW Differential Flavour Changing branching Neutral Current fraction of NP SM B+→K+μ+ (FCNC) μ− ¡ Measure the differential branching fraction : arXiv:1209.4284 Event yield 1232 ± 40 of B + → K + μ + μ in 1.0 fb -1 and normalise to B + → ¡J/ψ ¡K + 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  43. 44 DF=1, EW F H and the FB asymetry A FB are expected to be null in the SM arXiv:1209.4284 If muons were massless, F H would be proportional to the contributions from (pseudo- )scalar ¡and ¡tensor ¡operators ¡to ¡the ¡partial ¡width, ¡Γ. 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  44. 45 � F=1, EW AFB(B 0 →K* 0 μ+μ– ) : An extraordinarily complex but beautiful analysis First measurement of the zero-crossing point of the forward-backward asymmetry q 2 = (4.9+1.1−1.3) ¡GeV 2 (SM predictions in the range 4.0 – 4.3 GeV2) 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  45. 46 � F=1, Higgs Standard Model expectation, e.g. ¡(3.2 ¡― ¡0.3) ¡x ¡10 -9 ATLAS ¡B(Bs→μ+μ– ) < 2.2 (1.9) × 10 −8 @ 95% (90%) CL CMS ¡B(Bs→μ+μ– ) < 7.7 (6.4) × 10 −9 @ 95% (90%) CL 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  46. 47 � F=2, Semileptonic asymmetries The observables : LHCb-CONF-2012-022 How we measure it : Yields 190 k B s0 candidates in 1.0 fb -1 : D s- D s+ 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  47. Semileptonic asymmetries 48 Delicate systematic treatement is needed : • Obtain any corrections from data/control samples. • Pay ¡attention ¡to ¡the ¡π ¡and ¡μ ¡detection ¡asymmetries. ¡ • Swap magnetic field to help cancel effects. 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  48. 49 Semileptonic asymmetries We measure : a sl s = (-0.24 ± 0.54 ± 0.33 ) % Most precise measurement ! LHCb-CONF-2012-022 And also in agreement with SM as quoted in arXiv:1205.1444 a sl s = (0.0019 ± 0.0003 ) % and a sl d = (-0.0041 ± 0.0006 ) % • Dominant systematic is from limited statistics in control sample. • 3 tension with SM in the D0 result, not confirmed or excluded by LHCb. • More decay modes, data are needed. But also the B 0 mode! 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  49. 50 B s → KK effective lifetime • B s → K + K - is a CP even eigenstate : • Dominantly a penguin decay. • Doubly Cabibbo suppressed tree decay. • Analysis uses minimal lifetime biasing selection : • No selection on variables biasing the lifetime. • Trigger and event selection based on NN using • Primiarly particle identification. � Independent of previous measurement using 40 pb -1 of data using a complementary technique in Phys.Lett. B 707 (2012) 349 This independent analysis is currently being updated with 1.0 fb -1 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  50. 51 B s → KK effective lifetime τ KK = 1.455 ± 0.046 (stat) ± 0.006 (syst) ps arXiv:1207.5993 HFAG Combinations (ICHEP 2012*) 51 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  51. 52 LHCb Near Future Highlights LHCb ¡will ¡dramatically ¡improve ¡the ¡precision ¡of ¡γ ¡measurements ¡ from 11º to ~2º in the next years B s0 mixing. Study of the theoretically clean CP-violating phase � s will be extended to reach SM level precision, stringently constraining new physics models such as B s0 → �� decays B 0d →K* ���� B s,d → �� γ To complete the programme (e.g. % resolution on angles) need more data. Originally 5fb -1 now 50fb -1 ... (why?) 17/10/2012 Birmingham

  52. 53 LHCb Upgrade 17/10/2012 Birmingham

Recommend


More recommend