op Water ter Su Sustaina stainabili bility ty Wor orksh kshop A A Smar Smart-Phone Phone Applica pplication tion for Hom or Home e Emissions Emissions Estima Estimates tes Michelle M. Rogers, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Carol J. Miller, Shawn P. McElmurry, Guoyao Xu, Weisong Shi, Caisheng Wang, Cheng-Zhong Xu, PhD Wayne State University – College of Engineering C OLLEGE OF ENGINEERIN G
WHY? WHY? Ener Energy y – Emissions Emissions Total generation: 4,120 billion (kWh) 3,950 billion (kWh) in 2009 Source: http://www.eia.doe.gov
Polluting Emissions from Electricity Generation http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-02-16/pdf/2012-806.pdf http://www.epa.gov/mats/actions.html
Emissions Effects Air Quality Visual Health (asthma) GHG………Climate (?) Contaminant Deposition Surface Water Soils Vegetation Food Chain Fish Consumption And,…. Even for the “non - environmentalist”……… Policy: Government Specified Caps
Problem: How to identify emission potential? Locational Marginal Price as Proxy for Generator Type Price ($/MWh) LMP at time t i Hydro & Nuclear Coal Natural Gas Oil
Locational Marginal Prices (LMP) LMPs based on marginal cost of supplying the next increment of electric demand at a specific location LMP Accounts for: generation marginal cost (fuel cost) physical aspects of transmission system (constraint in transmission lines) Cost of marginal power losses
Methodology Use LMP to point to the marginal fuel type Calculate emissions associated with that fuel type for a specific area (or specific generator)
Environmental Optimization Linking Consumption to Emissions 1. Source Identification • Dispatch adjusted every 5 minutes within MISO 2. Emission Quantification • Function of generator type
Locational Marginal Prices LMPs available from MISO (Midwest Independent System Operator) LMPs for select Commercial Pricing Nodes (CPNs) available every 5 minutes
LMP = f LMP = f (space,time) (space,time) Locational Marginal Prices…spatial variation
Locational Marginal Prices….temporal variation
Emission Rates LMP Marginal Generator Type Air Emissions Measured Air Emissions Data from EPA’s eGRID (Emissions & Generation Resource Integrated Database) Data on thousands of power plants in the US Sort by EGCL code (Electric Generating Company, Location-Based) i.e., all of DTE-operated plants in SE Michigan WE WANT THIS TO BE DEFINED ON THE FINEST GRID POSSIBLE….compare to an approach based on national averages of emissions/KWh
Emission Rates Calculate average emission rate for entire area for each fuel type Example, Detroit Edison: (2008 data) Air Emissions in pounds pollutant per MWhr generated (lb/MWh) Pollutant Nuclear Coal Natural Gas Distilled Fuel Oil SO2 0 10.54 1.65 2.3445 NOX 0 3.05 1.57 21.73 CO2 equiv 0 2071 2292 1862 Hg 0 5.26E-05 3.62E-06 5.81E-06 3.10E-05 1.66E-06 3.65E-05 Pb 1.09E-07 LMP Marginal Generator Type Air Emissions
Putting it Together: the HERO app HERO = Home Emissions Read-Out (LMP Marginal Generator Type Air Emissions) Applying this concept to household energy use Android App for smart phones
HERO ARCHITECTURE HERO: Home Emissions Read-Out 14
HERO Input HERO can automatically find nearest CPN based on phone’s GPS User also has choice to pick location from map
HERO Output Current, Past, and Projected Future emissions CO 2 , NO X , SO X , Mercury, Lead
HERO Screen Shots 17
18
User can view more to see background information on CO 2 , NO X , SO X , Mercury, Lead Environmental Effects, Human Health Effects Example: NO X & SO X
LEEM: Locational Emissions Estimation Methodology Output: Link LMP to Input: Geographic Closest LMP Marginal Real-Time Location Node Address Generator Emissions 20
HERO published in GooglePlay https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com. amaker.herotest&feature=search_result#?t=W251b GwsMSwyLDEsImNvbS5hbWFrZXIuaGVyb3Rlc3Q iXQ.. 21
Improvements? 22
Server-Based Approach 23
Test Case of Emissions Benefits Appliance Frequency Cycle Power Energy/ Intermittent Preferred (d -1 ) (kW) (Y/N) Length cycle Time (hrs) (kWh) Hr (1 - 24) Water Heater 1.00 3.00 1.29 3.87 YES 4 Defrost Cycle 2.00 0.33 0.70 0.23 NO 1 Dishwasher 0.50 2.0 0.98 1.97 NO 22 Clothes 1.00 0.5 0.61 0.31 NO 20 Washer Clothes Dryer 0.86 0.75 4.59 3.44 NO 19 24
BEST/WORST CASE PERFORMANCE Greatest Least Average change change Based change achieved by achieved by Node on LMP in target any any Region Location Year type pollutant pollutant pollutant RFCM Monroe, MI 2009 RT -68% -84% -33% RFCM Monroe, MI 2007 RT -78% -88% -49% RFCM Monroe, MI 2009 DA -27% -61% +1% RFCM St. Clair, MI 2009 RT -68% -84% -32% RFCM Midland, MI 2009 RT -70% -86% -29% SRMW Labadie, MO 2009 RT -74% -80% -49% MROW Fergus Falls, 2009 RT -70% -72% -64% MN 25
Great Lakes Benefits Consumer Great utilizes Lakes local Resident resources Fishing Engages Energy Restrictio Consuming n Lifted Device Reduced LEEM Hg in Optimiza Fish tion Reduction Change in Hg in 26 Emissions Demand
Extension of Project 27
Thanks to Great Lakes Protection Fund THANK YOU Water ter Su Sustaina stainabili bility ty Wor orksh kshop op: : A S A Smar mart-Ph Phon one e App ppli lica cation tion for or Home Emission Home Emissions s Estima Es timates tes C OLLEGE OF ENGINEERIN G 28
Recommend
More recommend