50 pass
play

50% pass developmental credit course course pass take pass - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Calculating Success Co-Requisite Models # who # who # who # who take pass take pass 115 115 121 121 # who # who = Success Rate pass take 121 115 credit course 50% pass developmental credit course course pass take


  1. Calculating Success Co-Requisite Models # who # who # who # who take pass take pass 115 115 121 121 # who # who = Success Rate ฀ pass take 121 115

  2. credit course 50% pass

  3. developmental credit course course

  4. pass take pass developmental credit credit course course course 75% 75% 75% pass pass pass .75 X .75 X .75 = 42%

  5. The Pipeline Effect two one gate- levels level way down down course 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% pass take pass take pass = 17%

  6. What is a Co-Requisite Model? Developmental programs in which the developmental course is a co-requisite, not a pre-requisite, to the credit-level course.

  7. Co-Requisite Models Co-Requisite Models 3 hours 1 hour MyCompLab Studio Compressed 2 hours Writing Two Stretch Center Tri Instruc- Angle tors

  8. Co-Requisite Models Co-Requisite Models 3 hours 1 hour MyCompLab Studio Compressed 2 hours Writing Two Stretch Center Tri Instruc- Angle tors

  9. Co-Requisite Models 3 hours 1 hour MyCompLab Studio Compressed 2 hours Writing Co-Requisite Models Two Stretch Center Tri Instruc- Angle tors

  10. Co-Requisite Models 3 hours Co-Requisite Models 1. students are in ENG 101 2. cohort effect 3. small class size 4. coordination of two courses 5. attention to non-cogs 6. developmental students are in a class with 101-level students 7. progressive pedagogy 8. scalable 9. enough time to include reading and non-cogs

  11. Co-Requisite Models 3 hours 1 hour MyCompLab Studio Compressed 2 hours Writing Co-Requisite Models Two Stretch Center Tri Instruc- Angle tors 1. students are in ENG 101 1. students are in ENG 101 2. cohort effect 2. cohort effect 3. small class size 3. small class size 4. coordination of two courses 4. coordination of two courses 5. attention to non-cogs 5. attention to non-cogs 6. developmental students in a 6. developmental students in a class with 101-level students class with 101-level students 7. progressive pedagogy 7. progressive pedagogy 8. scalable 8. scalable 9. enough time to include 9. enough time to include reading and non-cogs reading and non-cogs

  12. Co-Requisite Models 3 hours 1 hour MyCompLab Studio Compressed 2 hours Writing Co-Requisite Models Two Stretch Center Tri Instruc- Angle tors 1. students are in ENG 101 1. students are in ENG 101 2. cohort effect 2. cohort effect 3. small class size 3. small class size 4. coordination of two courses 4. coordination of two courses 5. attention to non-cogs 5. attention to non-cogs 6. developmental students in a 6. developmental students in a class with 101-level students class with 101-level students 7. progressive pedagogy 7. progressive pedagogy 8. scalable 8. scalable 9. enough time to include 9. enough time to include reading and non-cogs reading and non-cogs

  13. Co-Requisite Models 3 hours 3 hours 1 hour 1 hour MyCompLab Compressed 2 hours 2 hours Writing Co-Requisite Models Two Stretch Center Tri Instruc- Angle tors 1. students are in ENG 101 1. students are in ENG 101 1. students are in ENG 101 2. cohort effect 2. cohort effect 2. cohort effect 3. small class size 3. small class size 3. small class size 4. coordination of two courses 4. coordination of two courses 4. coordination of two courses 5. attention to non-cogs 5. attention to non-cogs 5. attention to non-cogs 6. developmental students in a 6. developmental students in a 6. developmental students in a class with 101-level students class with 101-level students class with 101-level students 7. progressive pedagogy 7. progressive pedagogy 7. progressive pedagogy 8. Scalable 8. scalable 8. scalable 9. enough time to include 9. enough time to include 9. enough time to include reading and non-cogs reading and non-cogs reading and non-cogs

  14. Costs Analysis for 1000 students Traditional ALP Dev: 50 sections X $3000 = $150,000 Dev: 100 sections X $3000 = $300,000 101: 24 sections X $3000 = $ 72,000 101: 50 sections X $3000 = $150,000 total cost = $450,000 total cost = $222,000 Number of successful students = 333 Number of successful students = 740 Cost per successful student: $667 Cost per successful student: $581

  15. Cost/Revenue Analysis Traditional ALP revenue from tuition = $621,600 revenue from tuition = $840,000 revenue from state/county = $404,040 revenue from state/county = $546,000 total revenue = $1,025,640 total revenue = $1,386,000 total cost = $220,000 total cost = $450,000 difference = +$805,640 difference = +$936,000

  16. Oregon Model Co-Requisite Models ฀ 90 90 115 115 1. students are in ENG 101 2. cohort effect 3. small class size 4. coordination of two courses 5. attention to non-cogs 6. developmental students are in a class with 101-level students 7. progressive pedagogy 8. scalable 9. enough time to include reading and non-cogs

Recommend


More recommend