3dst acceptance without side ecal tpc
play

3DST acceptance without side ECAL/TPC Andriaseta Sitraka - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

3DST acceptance without side ECAL/TPC Andriaseta Sitraka (University of Antananarivo) Dr. Guang Yang (Stony Brook University) 1 Geometry A full 3DST set contains side TPC/ECAL and a dipole Magnet Goal of the study : without side, top,


  1. 3DST acceptance without side ECAL/TPC Andriaseta Sitraka (University of Antananarivo) Dr. Guang Yang (Stony Brook University) 1

  2. Geometry  A full 3DST set contains side TPC/ECAL and a dipole Magnet  Goal of the study : without side, top, bottom and upstream TPC/ECAL  Understand the efficiency and phase space coverage No Top and bottom TPC/ECAL No side ECAL/TPC 2

  3. Geometry 3  The total volume is 2.4 x 2.4 x 2 m and we used 2 kind of Fiducial Volume is 2.2 x 2.2 x 1.8 m and 1x1x1m 3 3  The efficiency are determined by selected events corresponding to a certain amoung of hadron or lepton energy contain in side, top, bottom and upstream veto region If the energy deposit in this veto region greater than a certain amount, this event is rejected. 3

  4. Lepton Momentum Vs Angle Efficiency ( FV= 2.2x2.2x1.8) -Require a detectable lepton deposit -Assume no side, top, bottom and upstream TPC/ECAL/Magnet 4

  5. Lepton Momentum Vs Angle Efficiency ( FV= 2.2x2.2x1.8) -Require a detectable lepton and hadronic deposit -Assume no side, top, bottom and upstream TPC/ECAL/Magnet 5

  6. Vertex Z Vs Vertex Y Efficiency ( FV= 2.2x2.2x1.8) -Require a detectable lepton deposit -Assume no side, top, bottom and upstream TPC/ECAL/Magnet 6

  7. Vertex Z Vs Vertex Y Efficiency ( FV= 2.2x2.2x1.8) -Require a detectable lepton and hadronic deposit -Assume no side, top, bottom and upstream TPC/ECAL/Magnet 7

  8. Vertex Z Vs Vertex Y yearly loss ( FV= 2.2x2.2x1.8) -Require a detectable lepton deposit -Assume no side, top, bottom and upstream TPC/ECAL/Magnet 8

  9. Lepton Momentum Vs Angle Efficiency ( FV= 1x1x1) -Require a detectable lepton deposit -Assume no side, top, bottom and upstream TPC/ECAL/Magnet 9

  10. Lepton Momentum Vs Angle Efficiency ( FV= 1x1x1) -Require a detectable lepton and hadronic deposit -Assume no side, top, bottom and upstream TPC/ECAL/Magnet 10

  11. Vertex Z Vs Vertex Y Efficiency ( FV= 1x1x1) -Require a detectable lepton deposit -Assume no side, top, bottom and upstream TPC/ECAL/Magnet 11

  12. Vertex Z Vs Vertex Y Efficiency ( FV= 1x1x1) -Require a detectable lepton and hadronic deposit -Assume no side, top, bottom and upstream TPC/ECAL/Magnet 12

  13. Vertex Z Vs Vertex Y yearly loss ( FV= 1x1x1) -Require a detectable lepton deposit -Assume no side, top, bottom and upstream TPC/ECAL/Magnet 13

Recommend


More recommend