Why Offsite? Planning for Housing Rory Bergin, Partner, Sustainable - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Why Offsite? Planning for Housing Rory Bergin, Partner, Sustainable Futures April 2017

Who we are? N G C I N O N N I S W U - L D T R A A N YEAR W C Y A HISTORY 165 STAFF

Our Services Design for Manufacture and Assembly Market Assessment for Manufacturers Technical Advice Feasibility Studies Design to Planning Planning to Delivery

Our experience with Ofgsite HTA - Annual Ofgsite Projects (2013-1016 actual - 2017 Predicted) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Why Ofgsite? Pros Cons Quicker construction Needs early engagement with manufacturer Early rent Designer returns needs to understand the discipline of DfMA Less disruption Needs timely decision- making from client More sustainable

Difgerent types of Ofgsite

Difgerent types of Ofgsite

Timeline Traditional vs Ofgsite Design & Construction Traditional vs. Offsite Design & Construction Construction phase time saved construction Man-hours Traditional Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Project 2015 2017 Felda House, Wembley

Project Sequence Years 0 3 6 9 12 Traditional Procurement Project Project Project 1 2 3 Better Procurement Project Project Project Project 1 2 3 4 Best Procurement Project Project Project Project Project Project 1 2 3 4 5 6

BIM Integration

BIM Integration

BIM Integration

Volumetric Modular Process First stage: Second stage: Third stage: slipform core and podium structure module delivery f acade delivery

Development of Ofgsite UK Government 50% 50% 50% Construction 33% 2025 faster delivery lower GHG emissions improvements in exports lower costs Strategy 20- 20- DfMA 70% 90% 20% 60% 40% Design for Reduction Reduction in Reduction in in onsite waste pollution and onsite labour Reduction in Manufacture using congestion Reduction in (health and construction volumetric construction (road safety) programme and construction costs accidents) time Assembly

The advantages of Volumetric Quality Control: Responsibility Simplifjed Safety: Waste: Enhanced Reduced BENEFITS Team: Productivity: More Cohesive Increased Shorter Site Time: Stable Costs: More Likely More Likely

Schemes we have Built Olympic Way Number of homes 158 Site size 0.54 (ha) Residential tower 20 Storey Typical fmoorplan Site plan

Schemes we have Built Felda (Karma House) Number of homes 450 Site size 0.16 (ha) Residential tower 17 Storey Typical fmoorplan Site plan

Schemes we have Built Dexion House Number of homes 802 Site size 0.38 (ha) Residential tower 18 Storey Typical fmoorplan Site plan

Schemes we have Built Apex House Number of homes 521 Site size 0.19 (ha) Residential tower 28 Storey Typical fmoorplan Site plan

Work in Progress Greenwich Creekside Number of homes 249 Site size 0.48 (ha) Residential tower 21 Storey 4 .2m 7m R o o m 6m m 5 . 0 6 4 6 . 4 m 4 5 . 3 m C c y l e s p a e c s 10 +7 .000 AOD +5 .000 AOD +3 .950 AOD ENTRANCE PRS 4 2 . m 7 staff room 12sqm +7 . 0 0 0 CONCIERGE A O D . 4 1 2 m p 1200x1800 W h a e r l Access e i h c a c e r l room 0 AOD cpd w c q 5 s m w c +7 .000 AOD w c 5 DDA WC . 9 1 USE w c s +3 254 sqm +7 .000 AOD 10sqm t a f f room 3 5 . 9 m D smoke vent e p p r m d o s q f change L f o 7 wc/ L f change wet riser K f a s t wc/ a f B s t B1-1 B1-6 s e t r o +7 .000 AOD +7 .000 AOD wc B wc LOBBY 411sqm +7 .000 AOD wc S b a B wc change b y storage milk prep BAR 1:40 S U Female WC Male WC K B +6 .780 B U S L +3 .870 +4 .00 B 0 B1-5 1:21 +7 smoke B vent K 4m +4 .815 1:34 +5 .025 1:40 U +5 .200 B 1:21 S U B 1:40 S +4 .250 AOD +5 .090 +5 .560 A1 , A2 , A3 B1 USE MHW B S T +6 .100 O R 1:21 A G 105 SQM E PRS AMENITY +5 .2 AOD M D Q A O CONCIERGE S 0 a 1200x1800 Access i r h W l e e c h B 1 7 0 6 1 5 . + smoke vent REFUSE L CHUTE A1 , A2 , A3 B1 USE S T O R QM A G B +6 .000 AOD E 1 S +6 .000 B1-2 0 .4m 1 K M N I A T U CPD E N A N C E +5 .200AOD U S S A1 , A2 , A3 B1 USE K B 249 SQM +8 .000AOD 4 .4m B1-3 1:21 B K B +5 .200 AOD B B1-4 +5 .200 AOD +5 .200 B O L L H ( 4 .000 AOD) 10 Cycle spaces +5 .200 CREEKSIDE EAST LEWISHAM RESOLVED TO GRANT SCHEME MHW +5 .200 AOD +5 .200 AOD IDE EAS Typical fmoorplan Site plan

Queen’s Parade Work in Progress Typical fmoorplan 8 Storeys Residential tower 631.5 (ha) Site size 129 Number of homes F 16/02/16 AMR Corner flats amended E 05/01/16 AMR Corner flats & north units amended D 11/03/15 LBE Corner flat & wheelchair unit amended. C 10/03/15 LBE Corner flat, wheelchair unit & core layout amended. B 27/02/15 LBE Corner flat, wheelchair unit S i & core layout updated. t e B o A 23/02/15 LBE Corner flat & core layout updated. n u Rev Rev Date Date Drawn Drawn Description Description d a r y _ _ Site plan F 16/02/16 AMR Corner flats amended E 05/01/16 AMR Corner flats & north units amended D 11/03/15 LBE Corner flat & wheelchair unit amended. C 10/03/15 LBE Corner flat, wheelchair unit & core layout amended. B 27/02/15 LBE Corner flat, wheelchair unit & core layout updated. A 23/02/15 LBE Corner flat & core layout updated. Rev Rev Date Date Drawn Drawn Description Description _ _

Work in Progress Savoy Circus Number of homes 320 Site size 0.6 (ha) Residential tower 8 Storey T T 5 5 1 1 T T 5 5 0 0 U U N N I I U U N N I I U U N N T I I T 4 4 9 9 U U N N T I I T 4 4 8 8 4 4 7 7 4 4 6 6 U U N N I I T T 1500 U U N N I I T T E N N I I T T 4 4 5 5 S U U C A N N I T T I 4 4 4 4 U U N N I T I T 4 4 0 0 4 4 3 3 U U P T T 4 4 2 2 U U N N T I I T E 1 1 U U N N I I S S - C U U N N T I T I 4 4 A C C E O P O S T W C RECEPTION E A B L E R O F F I C BOXES R Area: I STUDENT RECREATION & COMMUNITY ROOMS D Area: 9.07m² O Area: 10.50m² R 8 . 9 0 m ² 1 1500 Route to lifts Area: U U N N I I T T 3 3 9 9 ENTRANCE LOBBY 9 1 8 . 4 m ² 1250 1250 ENTRANCE T A T I O N N D O R I E N 1500 1500 A turning turning circle circle n n U U N N T I I T 3 3 8 8 m m i i 1400 x 1400 x 1500 1500 1100 1100 m m 1400 x n i i n 1400 x U U N N I T I T 1 1 min 1400 x 1500 1100 1100 U U N N T I I T 2 2 T T 3 3 1100 T T 4 4 U U N N I I 1200 1200 U U N N I I min x UNIT 1 UNIT 1 U U N N I I T T 5 5 4 1 0 0 UNIT 2 U U N N I T I T 6 6 1100 UNIT 3 T I I T 3 3 7 7 7 7 COFFEE UNIT 4 U U N N U U N N I I T T 1200 UNIT 5 SHOP UNIT 6 UNIT 7 6 6 T T 8 8 U U N N I I T T 3 3 U U N N I I FIREFIGHTING ACCESS UNIT 8 9 9 CORRIDOR Area: U U N N I T T I U U N N T I T I 3 3 5 5 10.62m² UNIT 9 COMMS ROOM U U N N I I T T 3 3 4 4 UNIT 10 UNIT 10 UNIT 10 0 5 2 1 U U N N I I T T 1 1 1 1 T 1 1 T T 3 3 3 3 N I T 2 9 U N I U U N N I I U 2 2 U U N N T I I T 3 3 U N I T 2 8 UNIT 12 UNIT 12 UNIT 12 N I T 1 3 N N I I T T 1 1 3 3 7 U 3 3 1 1 U U U N I T 2 U U N N I I T T U N I T 2 6 UNIT 14 U U N N I I T T 3 3 0 0 UNIT 14 UNIT 14 U N I T 1 5 T 2 5 T T 1 1 5 5 U N I U U N N I I U U N N I I T T 2 2 9 9 2 4 U N I T UNIT 16 UNIT 16 UNIT 16 T T 2 2 8 8 U U N N I I 7 U N I T 1 N I T 2 3 U 1 1 7 7 U U N N T I I T U U N N I I T T 2 2 7 7 N T I 2 2 U UNIT 18 6 6 UNIT 18 UNIT 18 U U N N I I T T 2 2 U N I T 2 1 I I T T 2 2 5 5 U U N N U N I T 2 0 R O U U N N I I T T 2 2 4 4 I D 9 R R U N I T 1 O E C P C A E S 2 2 3 3 U U N N I T T I REFUSE N N I I T T 1 1 9 9 1433 1433 U U Area: N N I I T T 2 2 2 2 72.27m² U U UNIT 21 UNIT 21 2 2 0 0 U U N N I T T I Typical fmoorplan Site plan

Work in Progress Brentford Number of homes 225 Site size 0.63 (ha) Residential tower 8-10 Storey

Work in Progress Greenford Number of homes 1965 Site size 10.6 (ha) Residential tower 17 Storey

Work in Progress The Portal North Acton Number of homes 355 Site size 0.37 (ha) Residential tower 36 Storey

Current workload

Self Build and Custom Build Models Custom Self Build Build Custom Group Build Self Build Dev.