wastewater treatment plant
play

Wastewater Treatment Plant Preliminary Engineering Contract - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Wastewater Treatment Plant Preliminary Engineering Contract Amendment No. 6 Purpose The purpose of this agenda bill is to seek City Councils approval of Amendment Number 6 to the Consultant Agreement with Carollo Engineers for


  1. Wastewater Treatment Plant Preliminary Engineering Contract Amendment No. 6

  2. Purpose  The purpose of this agenda bill is to seek City Council’s approval of Amendment Number 6 to the Consultant Agreement with Carollo Engineers for preliminary design of the new Wastewater Treatment Plant in the Windjammer Vicinity. 2 3/19/2013

  3. Project Need  Existing treatment facilities are outdated and nearing capacity.  Increasingly stringent water quality standards  Both outfalls have major problems  Marsh surrounding lagoons reclaimed in 2009  Requirement of National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit 3 3/19/2013

  4. Project Goals  Provide reliable wastewater treatment  Meet high water quality standards  Phasing opportunities  Deliver a plan that keeps on track to start the new treatment plant by the end of 2017 4 3/19/2013

  5. Objective of Preliminary Design  Complete Value Engineering  Finalize Location of WWTP within the Windjammer Vicinity  Procure Major Process Equipment  Membranes  UV disinfection  30 % Design  Delivery Method  Design / Bid / Build  Design Build  General Contractor / Construction Manager (GC/CM) 5 3/19/2013

  6. Project Team Subconsultant Role ESA Environmental / Cultural Enviroissues Public Meeting Support Michael Willis Architects Architectural GeoEngineers Geotechnical Design Bruce Dees & Assoc Landscape Design Webster Environmental Odor Control Cosmopolitan Engineering Outfall Design Harmsen Associates Survey 6 3/19/2013

  7. City Contract Responsibility  City Retains Control Over the Following Contracts  Value Engineering Facilitator and T eam  Property Acquisition Expert  Cultural Resource Investigator  Parks / Open Space Planner  Transportation Planner  Commercial Real Estate Advisor  Charrette Facilitator  GC/CM Advisor 7 3/19/2013

  8. Scope of Services  Task 100 – Project Management  Management Plan  Monitoring and Reporting  Management Meetings  Task 200 – Value Engineering (VE) Support  Conceptual level design  Participation in VE workshop  Recommendations 8 3/19/2013

  9. Scope of Services  Task 300 – Public Process Support  Participation in charrettes  Workshops  Working groups  City Council  Task 400 – WWTP Preliminary Design  Major equipment procurement  Membranes  UV Disinfection  30% design documents 9 3/19/2013

  10. Scope of Services  Task 500 – Project Delivery Analysis  Provide comparison of delivery methods  Task 600 – Outfall Design  100% design of new outfall  Permitting  Task 700 – Management Reserve  Allows City Engineer to make minor adjustments as needed  5% of contract amount 10 3/19/2013

  11. Summary by Task Task Cost Task 100 – Project Management $69,978 Task 200 – Value Engineering Support $289,417 Task 300 – Public Process Support $198,610 Task 400 – WWTP Preliminary Design $964,416 Task 500 – Project Delivery Analysis $14,498 Task 600 – Outfall Design $262,363 Carollo Fee $159,152 Subconsultant Markup $23,650 Subtotal $1,982,065 Task 700 – Management Reserve (5%) $99,103 T otal $2,081,168 11 3/19/2013

  12. Summary by Activity Task Cost “Traditional” Preliminary Design $1,511,644 Additional Services -Value Engineering $60,698 - Public Process $130,037 - Outfall Design and Permitting $279,686 Subtotal $470,421 Management Reserve $99,103 T otal $2,081,168 12 3/19/2013

  13. Project Schedule 13 3/19/2013

  14. Facilities Plan Project Schedule Preliminary Design Final Design Construction Start up 14 3/19/2013

  15. Project Schedule 15 3/19/2013

  16. Verification of Scope and Cost  Industry Guidelines  Water Environment Federation (WEF)  WA Office of Financial Management  2012 CA Multi-Agency CIP Benchmarking Study  Similar Projects  Other MBR treatment plants in our region  Other City Projects  Gun Club Road  North Reservoir  SE Pioneer Way 16 3/19/2013

  17. Verification of Scope and Cost  Studies Typically Address Total Cost  Preliminary Design = $2,081,168  Final Design = TBD  Total = 10% of Total Construction Cost 17 3/19/2013

  18. Total Design Cost  California Multi-Agency Benchmarking Study – 2012  San Francisco  Sacramento  Oakland  San Jose  Los Angeles  Long Beach  San Diego 18 3/19/2013

  19. Studies 19 3/19/2013

  20. Total Design Cost  Similar Projects Gallons per Day vs. % of Total Construction Cost (TCC) 18.0% Shelton 16.2% % of Total Construction Cost (TCC) 16.0% 14.0% King County Blaine 12.0% 10.9% 10.7% Everett 10.0% 10% 10.7% Oak Harbor Salem 8.0% 8.0% Bellingham 6.6% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Millions of Gallons per Day (GPD) 20 3/19/2013

  21. Summary of Design Costs  Preliminary Design = $2,081,168  Total Costs  Estimated T otal Construction Cost = $60 to $67 million  Design Cost = ±10% of T otal Construction Cost  Design Cost = $6 to $6.7 million  Final Design Contract = $4 to $4.7 million  Approximately 1 year from now 21 3/19/2013

  22. Summary  Tasks include “Traditional” and supplemental services  Does not include contracts where it is in the City’s best interest  Design cost is included in “$93.5 million” Design Effort Cost Timing Preliminary Design $2,081,168 Today Final Design $4 to $4.7 million 1Year Total $6 to $6.7 million 22 3/19/2013

  23. Funding  Water Fund  Included in current rate structure 23 3/19/2013

  24. Requested Action  A motion to authorize the Mayor to sign Consultant Agreement Amendment Number 6 with Carollo Engineers in the amount of $2,081,168 for preliminary design related to a new wastewater treatment plant. 24 3/19/2013

  25. 25 3/19/2013

Recommend


More recommend