vertical visibility among parallel polygons in three
play

Vertical Visibility among Parallel Polygons in Three Dimensions GD - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Vertical Visibility among Parallel Polygons in Three Dimensions GD 2015 Radoslav Fulek (IST, Austria), Rado s Radoi ci c (CUNY) Visibility clique Visibility clique We consider a finite set S of translates/homothetes of two dimensional


  1. Vertical Visibility among Parallel Polygons in Three Dimensions GD 2015 Radoslav Fulek (IST, Austria), Radoˇ s Radoiˇ ci´ c (CUNY)

  2. Visibility clique

  3. Visibility clique We consider a finite set S of translates/homothetes of two dimensional convex polygons in R 3 .

  4. Visibility clique We consider a finite set S of translates/homothetes of two dimensional convex polygons in R 3 . A pair of polygons P 1 , P 2 ∈ S see each other if there exists a line segment ℓ orthogonal to both of them connecting them such that ℓ is disjoint from other polygons in S .

  5. Visibility clique We consider a finite set S of translates/homothetes of two dimensional convex polygons in R 3 . A pair of polygons P 1 , P 2 ∈ S see each other if there exists a line segment ℓ orthogonal to both of them connecting them such that ℓ is disjoint from other polygons in S . P 2 P 1 P 3

  6. Visibility clique We consider a finite set S of translates/homothetes of two dimensional convex polygons in R 3 . A pair of polygons P 1 , P 2 ∈ S see each other if there exists a line segment ℓ orthogonal to both of them connecting them such that ℓ is disjoint from other polygons in S . P 2 P 1 P 3 P 1 sees P 2 , but P 1 does not see P 3

  7. Visibility clique We consider a finite set S of translates/homothetes of two dimensional convex polygons in R 3 . A pair of polygons P 1 , P 2 ∈ S see each other if there exists a line segment ℓ orthogonal to both of them connecting them such that ℓ is disjoint from other polygons in S . The set S forms a visibility clique if every pair of polygons in S see each other.

  8. Visibility clique We consider a finite set S of translates/homothetes of two dimensional convex polygons in R 3 . A pair of polygons P 1 , P 2 ∈ S see each other if there exists a line segment ℓ orthogonal to both of them connecting them such that ℓ is disjoint from other polygons in S . The set S forms a visibility clique if every pair of polygons in S see each other. P 1 P 2 P 3

  9. Visibility clique We consider a finite set S of translates/homothetes of two dimensional convex polygons in R 3 . A pair of polygons P 1 , P 2 ∈ S see each other if there exists a line segment ℓ orthogonal to both of them connecting them such that ℓ is disjoint from other polygons in S . The set S forms a visibility clique if every pair of polygons in S see each other. P 1 P 2 { P 1 , P 2 , P 3 } forms a visibility clique. P 3

  10. Bounding size of a visibility clique

  11. Bounding size of a visibility clique We are interested in the maximum size f ( k ) of the visibility clique for translates of a regular convex k -gon.

  12. Bounding size of a visibility clique We are interested in the maximum size f ( k ) of the visibility clique for translates of a regular convex k -gon.

  13. Bounding size of a visibility clique We are interested in the maximum size f ( k ) of the visibility clique for translates of a regular convex k -gon.

  14. Bounding size of a visibility clique We are interested in the maximum size f ( k ) of the visibility clique for translates of a regular convex k -gon.

  15. Bounding size of a visibility clique We are interested in the maximum size f ( k ) of the visibility clique for translates of a regular convex k -gon.

  16. Bounding size of a visibility clique We are interested in the maximum size f ( k ) of the visibility clique for translates of a regular convex k -gon.

  17. Bounding size of a visibility clique We are interested in the maximum size f ( k ) of the visibility clique for translates of a regular convex k -gon.

  18. Bounding size of a visibility clique We are interested in the maximum size f ( k ) of the visibility clique for translates of a regular convex k -gon.

  19. Bounding size of a visibility clique We are interested in the maximum size f ( k ) of the visibility clique for translates of a regular convex k -gon. Thus, f (4) ≥ 7 .

  20. Bounding size of a visibility clique We are interested in the maximum size f ( k ) of the visibility clique for translates of a regular convex k -gon. Thus, f (4) ≥ 7 . In fact, f (4) = 7 . Fekete et al. 1995

  21. Bounding size of a visibility clique We are interested in the maximum size f ( k ) of the visibility clique for translates of a regular convex k -gon. Thus, f (4) ≥ 7 . In fact, f (4) = 7 . Fekete et al. 1995 Also, f (3) ≥ 14 . Babilon et al. 1999

  22. Bounding size of a visibility clique We are interested in the maximum size f ( k ) of the visibility clique for translates of a regular convex k -gon. Thus, f (4) ≥ 7 . In fact, f (4) = 7 . Fekete et al. 1995 Also, f (3) ≥ 14 . Babilon et al. 1999 Not hard to see f ( k ) ≥ ⌊ k 2 ⌋ .

  23. Bounding size of a visibility clique We are interested in the maximum size f ( k ) of the visibility clique for translates of a regular convex k -gon. Thus, f (4) ≥ 7 . In fact, f (4) = 7 . Fekete et al. 1995 Also, f (3) ≥ 14 . Babilon et al. 1999 Not hard to see f ( k ) ≥ ⌊ k 2 ⌋ .

  24. Bounding size of a visibility clique We are interested in the maximum size f ( k ) of the visibility clique for translates of a regular convex k -gon. Thus, f (4) ≥ 7 . In fact, f (4) = 7 . Fekete et al. 1995 Also, f (3) ≥ 14 . Babilon et al. 1999 Not hard to see f ( k ) ≥ ⌊ k 2 ⌋ . f ( k ) ≤ 2 2 k Babilon et al. 1999

  25. Bounding size of a visibility clique We are interested in the maximum size f ( k ) of the visibility clique for translates of a regular convex k -gon. Thus, f (4) ≥ 7 . In fact, f (4) = 7 . Fekete et al. 1995 Also, f (3) ≥ 14 . Babilon et al. 1999 Not hard to see f ( k ) ≥ ⌊ k 2 ⌋ . f ( k ) ≤ 2 2 k Babilon et al. 1999

  26. f ( k ) ≤ 2 2 k Babilon et al. 1999

  27. f ( k ) ≤ 2 2 k Babilon et al. 1999 P 1 P 2

  28. f ( k ) ≤ 2 2 k Babilon et al. 1999 p 1 p 2 1 2 P 1 5 3 4 P 2

  29. f ( k ) ≤ 2 2 k Babilon et al. 1999 p 1 Define partial orders < i for p 2 1 1 ≤ i ≤ k . We have P 1 < 1 P 2 . 2 P 1 5 3 4 P 2

  30. f ( k ) ≤ 2 2 k Babilon et al. 1999 p 1 Define partial orders < i for p 2 1 1 1 ≤ i ≤ k . Now, P 1 and P 2 are 2 incomparable by < 1 . P 1 5 3 4 P 2

  31. f ( k ) ≤ 2 2 k Babilon et al. 1999 p 1 Define partial orders < i for p 2 1 1 1 ≤ i ≤ k . Now, P 1 and P 2 are 2 incomparable by < 1 . P 1 5 3 By Dilworth theorem we can pick 4 P 2 a chain or anti-chain of size at � least f ( k ) .

  32. f ( k ) ≤ 2 2 k Babilon et al. 1999 p 1 Define partial orders < i for p 2 1 1 1 ≤ i ≤ k . Now, P 1 and P 2 are 2 incomparable by < 1 . P 1 5 3 By Dilworth theorem we can pick 4 P 2 a chain or anti-chain of size at � least f ( k ) . We have k partial orders, and hence, �� � f ( k ) ≤ 2 . . . � �� � k − times

  33. f ( k ) ≤ 2 2 k Babilon et al. 1999 p 1 Define partial orders < i for p 2 1 1 1 ≤ i ≤ k . Now, P 1 and P 2 are 2 incomparable by < 1 . P 1 5 3 By Dilworth theorem we can pick 4 P 2 a chain or anti-chain of size at � least f ( k ) . We have k partial orders, and hence, �� � f ( k ) ≤ 2 . . . � �� � P 3 k − times P 2 P 1 ( P 1 ∩ P 3 ) ⊂ P 2

  34. Bounding size of a visibility clique

  35. Bounding size of a visibility clique Theorem 1. (F and Radoiˇ ci´ c 15+) For homothetes of convex k -gon we have f ( k ) ≤ 2 2 ( k 2 ) +2 .

  36. Bounding size of a visibility clique Theorem 1. (F and Radoiˇ ci´ c 15+) For homothetes of convex k -gon we have f ( k ) ≤ 2 2 ( k 2 ) +2 . First, we pick 1 4 fraction of homothetes such that no pair of them is contained one in another.

  37. Bounding size of a visibility clique Theorem 1. (F and Radoiˇ ci´ c 15+) For homothetes of convex k -gon we have f ( k ) ≤ 2 2 ( k 2 ) +2 . First, we pick 1 4 fraction of homothetes such that no pair of them is contained one in another. Consider the poset ( P, ⊆ ) and observe that we have no chain of length five . P 3 P 1 P 2

  38. Bounding size of a visibility clique Theorem 1. (F and Radoiˇ ci´ c 15+) For homothetes of convex k -gon we have f ( k ) ≤ 2 2 ( k 2 ) +2 . First, we pick 1 4 fraction of homothetes such that no pair of them is contained one in another. Consider the poset ( P, ⊆ ) and observe that we have no chain of length five . Use Dilworth theorem. P 3 P 1 P 2

  39. Bounding size of a visibility clique Theorem 1. (F and Radoiˇ ci´ c 15+) For homothetes of convex k -gon we have f ( k ) ≤ 2 2 ( k 2 ) +2 . • We order homothetes from left to right according to x -coordinates of centers of gravity. • We color each edge in the visibility clique with a pair consisting of a two element set encoding the vertices supporting the common tangents, and an indicator for � k � its above–below relationship. We use 2 colors. 2 P 1 1 1 2 c ( P 1 P 2 ) = ( { 1 , 4 } , 0) 4 3 4 P 2

  40. Bounding size of a visibility clique Theorem 1. (F and Radoiˇ ci´ c 15+) For homothetes of convex k -gon we have f ( k ) ≤ 2 2 ( k 2 ) +2 . • We order homothetes from left to right according to x -coordinates of centers of gravity. • We color each edge in the visibility clique with a pair consisting of a two element set encoding the vertices supporting the common tangents, and an indicator for � k � its above–below relationship. We use 2 colors. 2 • We apply a Ramsey–type theorem for ordered graphs.

Recommend


More recommend