Variable Piedmont rock conditions in a Washington, DC Water Shaft Geohazards 2018 Steve Mogilnicki – WRA Acknowledgements Corman, DC Water, Davis, Bradshaw
Outline 1. purpose 2. geologic setting 3. methods 4. observations 5. rock reinforcement 6. conclusion
1. purpose C.S.O. Drop Shaft 21 Kennedy Center DC Water Clean Rivers Project
Shaft in rock drill & blast 28 feet diameter 96 feet deep
2. geologic setting Coastal Plain Modified from USGS
Schist
Melange of Rock Creek Shear Zone turbidite sediments metamorphosed into schist USGS Wash. W. quad (1994) fill Fleming, Drake, McCartan
Image from http://www.scotese.com PALEOMAP
3. methods strength & weathering foliation, joints, mineralization spacing/roughness/infill - discontinuities weak zones & faults strike & dip
8 pre-blast visits, Aug. to Oct. 2017
Quadrants Approach Channel A D B C
blast hole drilling
4. observations Quadrant A Foliation dips out of cut Steep joints (2)
largest joint - planar
wedge
Discontinuities Foliation - strike NE, moderate dip SE, spaced 1 – 3 feet, rough Joints - strike often NW, steep dip, spaced ½ - 2 feet, smooth
Quadrant C Foliation dips into cut Joints
Clay on smooth joint
Weak rock geohazard intensely fractured highly weathered
Slickenside on joint fault strike N 15 W dip 70 NE
foliation data strike NE dip SE regional shear
joint data 2 sets NW
5. rock reinforcement – bolts & mesh
filler concrete - rockfall
Shotcrete
6. In conclusion Geologic work aided multidisciplinary drop shaft construction effort
Recommend
More recommend