v vacuum electron device el t d i limitations for high
play

V Vacuum Electron Device El t D i Limitations for High-Power - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

V Vacuum Electron Device El t D i Limitations for High-Power RF Sources Heinz Bohlen, Thomas Grant Microwave Power Products Division CPI, Palo Alto l l 1 Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Devices


  1. V Vacuum Electron Device El t D i Limitations for High-Power RF Sources Heinz Bohlen, Thomas Grant Microwave Power Products Division CPI, Palo Alto l l 1

  2. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Devices discussed in this presentation: CW and High Average Power Amplifiers CW and High Average Power Amplifiers - Single-Beam Klystrons - Multi-Beam Klystrons (MBK) - Single-Beam Inductive Output Tubes (IOT) Si l B I d ti O t t T b (IOT) - Higher-Order-Mode IOT (HOM-IOT) 2

  3. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g CW and High Average Power Devices not (yet) considered here: - Sheet Beam Klystrons (early state of development) - Coaxial IOT (early state of development) - Gyrotrons Gyrotrons - Traveling Wave Tubes 3

  4. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Warning: - Numerous papers on this subject have been written already. - Device limitations are shifting with time and effort. g - “Absolute” limits have been proven wrong, again and again. Thus: Thus: - In the limited time frame available, just expect a chat about some of the borderlines that are presently under siege. f h b d li h l d i 4

  5. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Limitations discussed in the following VED technology related - Size Size - Output window capability - Output cavity capability - HV breakdown in electron guns HV b kd i l t - Cathode emission limitations Other reasons - Manufacturing capacity - Reproducibility Reproducibility - Demand 5 - “Blinkers”

  6. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Klystron technology limitations (debated) l h l li i i (d b d) 6

  7. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Considerable part of former klystron domain claimed by IOTs Considerable part of former klystron domain claimed by IOTs Why? 0.1 1 10 100 1000 7 Frequency (GHz)

  8. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g IOTs have operational advantages… IOTs have operational advantages… - Efficiency - Absence of saturation - Pulse-able via RF - Small size - High linearity …and they are less expensive! Di Disadvantage: d t - Low gain (± 22 dB) 8

  9. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Thus IOTs have replaced klystrons in a Thus IOTs have replaced klystrons in a growing number of applications. E Example: l External cavity IOTs Here: CHK2800W - tunable 470 – 860 MHz tunable 470 860 MHz - 130 kW in digital TV - 80 kW CW at 500 MHz 9

  10. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g IOT limitations discussed here: - Size Size - Average output power - Operational frequency IOT domain 0.1 1 10 100 1000 Frequency (GHz) 10

  11. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Linear-beam IOTs feature a size Linear-beam IOTs feature a size limitation at frequencies lower than ~ 200 MHz, due to their waveguide-type output cavities. id t t t iti Example here: “Chalk River” IOT 250 kW CW at 267 MHz 250 kW CW at 267 MHz 73 % efficiency C Coaxial IOTs do not suffer from i l IOT d t ff f that restriction! 11

  12. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Safe operation of external cavities Safe operation of external cavities is limited to ~ 80 kW. Beyond that level integrated cavities become necessary. This example: 500 MHz / 90 KW CW 500 MHz / 90 KW CW IOT K5H90W (here at BESSY/PTB, Berlin) 12

  13. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Higher power from a linear-beam IOT requires both higher beam Higher power from a linear-beam IOT requires both higher beam voltage and higher beam current. Both are limited: 13

  14. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Higher power from a linear-beam IOT requires both higher beam Higher power from a linear-beam IOT requires both higher beam voltage and higher beam current. Both are limited: - The beam voltage in continuous operation should not exceed 120 kV by a larger margin, independent from the size of the electron gun electron gun. 14

  15. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Higher power from a linear-beam IOT requires both higher beam Higher power from a linear-beam IOT requires both higher beam voltage and higher beam current. Both are limited: - The beam voltage in continuous operation should not exceed 120 kV by a larger margin, independent from the size of the electron gun electron gun. - Due to the control grid, overall perveances exceeding 0.4 µA/V 3/2 are difficult to achieve in class C operation in a linear- A/V 3/2 diffi lt t hi i l C ti i li beam IOT. 15

  16. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Higher power from a linear-beam IOT requires both higher beam Higher power from a linear-beam IOT requires both higher beam voltage and higher beam current. Both are limited: - The beam voltage in continuous operation should not exceed 120 kV by a larger margin, independent from the size of the electron gun electron gun. - Due to the control grid, overall perveances exceeding 0.4 µA/V 3/2 are difficult to achieve in class C operation in a linear- A/V 3/2 diffi lt t hi i l C ti i li beam IOT. - IOT devices in the MW range therefore require different approaches. 16

  17. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Higher power from a linear-beam IOT requires both higher beam Higher power from a linear-beam IOT requires both higher beam voltage and higher beam current. Both are limited. First approach to 1 MW: HOM-IOT with annular cathode and grid cathode and grid. Development sponsored b LANL by LANL. Proved the principle, but turned out to be too vulnarable. 17

  18. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Second approach to 1 MW level: d h l l HOM-IOT with n single beams. 18

  19. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Presently under development: y p 19

  20. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g The operational frequency of IOTs is limited due to transit time h i l f f i li i d d i i limitations in the cathode-grid space. 20

  21. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g The operational frequency of IOTs is limited due to transit time h i l f f i li i d d i i limitations in the cathode-grid space. For reliability reasons the distance between cathode and grid must be kept at a and grid must be kept at a certain minimum. The resulting transit time restricts the achievable fundamental frequency RF u d e eque cy current. 21

  22. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g The operational frequency of IOTs is limited due to transit time h i l f f i li i d d i i limitations in the cathode-grid space. For reliability reasons the Simulated example: distance between cathode 1.6 and grid must be kept at a and grid must be kept at a 1 4 1.4 1.2 certain minimum. 1 und [A] 0.8 I fu The resulting transit time 0.6 0.4 restricts the achievable 0.2 fundamental frequency RF u d e eque cy 0 0 current. 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 f [MHz] 22

  23. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Frequencies up to 2 GHz still easily viable with existing technology Frequencies up to 2 GHz still easily viable with existing technology Example: 1.3 GHz IOT 30 kW CW 30 kW CW 22 dB gain 232323 23

  24. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Under development: Under development: 1.3 GHz High-Power IOT 60 – 120 kW CW (Development sponsored by DESY) 24

  25. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Back to device limitations in the klystron sector: Back to device limitations in the klystron sector: Size (1) is much more an issue here than in the IOT domain. 25

  26. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g For save degassing VEDs need to be For save degassing VEDs need to be pumped at high temperatures in exhaust ovens. Their size limits the size of the klystrons. i f th kl t A klystron at the very size limit: YK 1320, up to 3 MW long-pulse Overall height: 5 m (Th (The engineer in the foreground is i i th f d i 1.84 m tall) 26

  27. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Still large but easier to manufacture: Still large, but easier to manufacture: VKP-7952A/B, 700/704 MHz, 1 MW CW 27

  28. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Still large but easier to manufacture: Still large, but easier to manufacture: VKP-7952A/B, 700/704 MHz, 1 MW CW and VKP-7958A, 500 MHz, 800 kW CW 28

  29. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Like in the IOT domain, high-voltage limitations , g g in the gun and cathode emission density considerations lead to multi-beam devices. 29

Recommend


More recommend