UT Participatory Day 2019 Yes, if versus No, unless 15:30 till - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

https://www.utwente.nl/en/ces/celt/programme-committee/ UT Participatory Day 2019 “Yes, if” – versus – “ No, unless” 15:30 till 16:10 ish 25 September 2019 Dr. Hans van den Berg, DipM Centre of Expertise in Learning & Teaching University of Twente UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019

Agenda proposal Kick-off, getting acquainted 15:30 – 15:50 On the PC and its context PC: where do you stand and where do you want A to be? 15:50 – 16:10 What does your PC need? Tree metaphor B Probably wise to chose between and A B UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019 2

Who is Hans? Graphic Arts industry Chemist (PhD) Marketer (DipM) Research & Tech director Trainer, advisor, Drinking water Consulting firm, evaluator, assessor research, manager management e.g. EB, PC consultant UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019 3

Who are you? UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019 4

= Supervisory The Programme Committee in UT’s bigger picture ADMINISTRATION PARTICIPATION COUNCILS Supervisory Board University council Executive Board, EB Institute board Institute council Faculty board Faculty council Examination board Programme Programme director Committee Service Eight Service Department Councils director UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019 5

How to tackle WHW? For a PC, it is vital to know the details. For training purposes, I tend to use summary information UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019 6

Slides in website Legal tasks of a Programme Committee WHW, reference date: December 2018 Election or appointment: PROGRAMME DIRECTOR Faculty Regulations Legal rights and tasks  a. Consent on parts of the EER b. Annual assessment of EER WHW states implementation Programme rules for c. Advice on parts of the EER Committee Chair composition d. Right to give advice and making proposals e. Task of discussing visitation report f. (and more) UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019 7

Seven themes arise from UT training / evaluation experiences and some UT / Dutch reports 1. CONNECTIONS 2. HANDLING COMPLEXITY 3. PROCESSES Exam Board • Connecting with E.g.: FC Programme Director PCs • the EER • Connecting annual PC Students cycles • ‘What is good education?’ Programme staff • FC meetings • “Yes, if” versus “No, unless” Outside experts • FC’s visibility 4. READING 7. STRUCTURING ‘ Why don’t you • Evaluate PCs PC development opportunities read me?’ • Link PCs to FC Re: Paul Simon • A PC Platform 5. CONTINUITY 6. PC STRATEGY Proactive Reactive years UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019 8

References Mostly in Dutch Further reading Hans van den Berg, The Programme Committee,version 1.0, August 2019. Available at https://www.utwente.nl/en/ces/celt/programme-committee/ Experiences e.g. visitation-related workshops with Programme Committees and Examination Boards; rehearsal visitations; training workshops with Programme Committees and Service Councils; evaluation workshop; talks with dean(s), PC chairs, and programme directors. Resources WHW (Dutch Higher Education and Research Act), in Dutch: www.wetten.nl Reports (all but one of them in Dutch) • OC-Wijzer – De handleiding voor je opleidingscommissie. LSVb, 2018 • Report on facilitation of participatory bodies at the University of Twente (draft). Contact persons: Marc-Jan Zeeman and Chris Rouwenhorst. 24 August 2018 • Handleiding voor Opleidingscommissies. UvA, Faculteit Geesteswetenschappen, 2018 • Algemene Rekenkamer, Voorinvesteringen en medezeggenschap hoger onderwijs. 2018 • Monitor Medezeggenschap Hoger Onderwijs – derde peiling 2017-2018. 2018 • Tim Cardol, Grote verschillen in functioneren opleidingscommissies. ScienceGuide 29 March 2018 https://www.scienceguide.nl/2018/03/grote-verschillen-in-functioneren-opleidingscommissies/ • Inspectie van het Onderwijs, Recht van spreken – Het functioneren van opleidingscommissies in het bekostigd hoger onderwijs in 2016. 2016 • Jet Bussemaker, minister OCW, Letter: Inwerkingtreding Wet versterking bestuurskracht, 20 december 2016 • Harry van den Tillaart, John Warmerdam en Evelien Sombekke, Monitor medezeggenschap op universiteiten en hogescholen. ISO – ITS Peiling 2015 • A.G.T. Bronzwaer en E.A.A. van Gorp, Onderzoek naar de participatie in medezeggenschapsraden van de Universiteit Twente. Wetenschapswinkel UT, 2011 • Investeren in Onderwijskwaliteit – Kwaliteitsafspraken 2019-2024. ISO – LSVb – OCW – VH – VSNU, 2018 UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019 9

Exercise A You can work on the A3 paper UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019 10

EXERCISE A Relationship between PC and Programme Management PC Works 1 4 proactive PC Works reactive 2 3 PC Works PC Works in together with PM isolation UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019 11

Indicate the current position ( ) of the PC vis-à-vis the PM, and what position you would like the UC to have ( ). EXERCISE A And draw a line between both PC Works 1 4 proactive Please use a THIN line to make this less ‘crowded’ PC Works reactive 2 3 PC Works in PC Works isolation together with PM UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019 12

Exercise B You can work on the A3 paper UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019 13

B EXERCISE Operation of a Programme Committee metaphor = tree From the crown one picks the fruits Good feed and attention assure a strong trunk This is where one feeds the tree: firm soil, clean water, ‘pokon’ UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019 14

HANDOUT EXERCISE B Possible translation to Programme Committee (PC) Instruction = verbally UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019 15

Statement: This was a good workshop G G A. Yes Would you like to B. A bit W W have a report of this workshop? C. No R R UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019 16