UMBC P erforming A rts & H umanities F acility Baltimore, MD - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

UMBC P erforming A rts & H umanities F acility Baltimore, MD Penn State AE Senior Capstone Project Courtney Glaub – Construction Management Dr. Chimay Anumba – CM Advisor

UMBC P erforming A rts & H umanities F acility Baltimore, MD PRESENTATION OUTLINE: Penn State AE Senior Capstone Project Courtney Glaub – Construction Management Dr. Chimay Anumba – CM Advisor

UMBC P erforming A rts & H umanities F acility UMBC P erforming A rts & H umanities F acility PROJEC JECT BACKGR GROUN OUND Baltimore, MD Baltimore, MD Courtney Glaub – Construction Management Courtney Glaub – Construction Management PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE: LO LOCATI TION ON: I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND I. Locatio ion/I /Info • 1000 Hilltop circle, baltimore, md 21250 II. Building ing Stats • umbc performing arts & Humanities facility II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE ING NG PARAM AMATER TERS: S: I. I. desig ign Buil ildi ding ng parameters: s: II II. Structural Impact ct III. II Schedule/C /Cost st Impact • 90,000 SF gross building area IV. Site Logist istics ics III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON • 4 stories + basement I. I. Crane Logist stics ics • Upgrade to existing central utility plant & tunnel II. II Schedule/C /Cost st Impact II III. Site Logist stic ics s PROJECT ECT PARAMET ETER ERS: S: SITE IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY Project ct parameter ers: s: I. I. System Design ign EHS CAMPUS II II. Structural Impact ct • projected cost: $67,000,000 III. II Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact • Dates of Construction: 7/1/2010 – 6/30/2012 IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis • Delivery Method: CM at Risk V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S • LEED Certification: Silver VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S IMAGE COURTESY OF WHITING-TURNER IMAGES COURTESY OF GOOGLE MAPS 3

UMBC P erforming A rts & H umanities F acility UMBC P erforming A rts & H umanities F acility PROJEC JECT BACKGR GROUN OUND Baltimore, MD Baltimore, MD Courtney Glaub – Construction Management Courtney Glaub – Construction Management PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE: STRUCTURAL AL SYSTEM TEM: I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND I. Locatio ion/I /Info • Foundation Concrete Footings II. Building ing Stats • Steel Beams and Girders II. II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE • Cast-in-place Concrete I. I. desig ign • Concrete Masonry Units II. II Structural Impact ct III. II Schedule/C /Cost st Impact BUILDING NG ENC NCLO LOSU SURE: E: IV. Site Logist istics ics III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON • Brick Veneer with CMU back-up or Steel Stud back-up I. I. Crane Logist stics ics II II. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact • Glazed Aluminum Curtain Wall III. II Site Logist stic ics s • Stainless Steel Wall Panels with Concrete/Steel Stud back-up SITE IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY I. I. System Design ign CONSTRUC TRUCTIO TION LO LOGISTI TICS: S: EHS CAMPUS II. II Structural Impact ct II III. Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact • Phase One: 275 Seat Proscenium Theater IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis 100 Seat Black Box Theater V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S Scene Shop, Rehearsal/Acting Studio, VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S Offices, Classrooms, Conference Rooms IMAGE COURTESY OF WHITING-TURNER 4

UMBC P erforming A rts & H umanities F acility UMBC P erforming A rts & H umanities F acility Prec ecas ast Faça çade e Des esign ign Baltimore, MD Baltimore, MD Courtney Glaub – Construction Management Courtney Glaub – Construction Management PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE: I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND I. Locatio ion/I /Info PROBLEM EM IDENTI ENTIFI FICATI TION: ON: II. Building ing Stats II. II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE • Complete project on time and efficiently I. I. desig ign • Building is made up of three different structural elements II. II Structural Impact ct • delays encountered due to adjacent work being completed II III. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact IV. Site Logist istics ics Site Logistics Image RESEA EARCH GOAL: III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON I. I. Crane Logist stics ics • Perform preliminary design of precast façade II. II Schedule/C /Cost st Impact • Reduce masonry schedule and eliminate any delays II III. Site Logist stic ics s SITE IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY I. I. System Design ign EHS CAMPUS II. II Structural Impact ct II III. Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S IMAGE COURTESY OF WHITING-TURNER VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S 5

UMBC P erforming A rts & H umanities F acility UMBC P erforming A rts & H umanities F acility Prec ecas ast Faça çade e Des esign ign Baltimore, MD Baltimore, MD Courtney Glaub – Construction Management Courtney Glaub – Construction Management PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE: I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND I. Locatio ion/I /Info ORIGIN INAL AL FACAD ADE: E: II. Building ing Stats II. II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE • 70% Driftwood Grey and 30% Light Autumn by Cloud Ceramics, I. I. desig ign Roman Modular type II. II Structural Impact ct • $900,000 masonry package II III. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact • 4 month construction duration IV. Site Logist istics ics III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON PRECAS AST T FACAD ADE: E: I. I. Crane Logist stics ics II. II Schedule/C /Cost st Impact • Span from column to column II III. Site Logist stic ics s • Different Sizes of Panels up to 12ft and 35-40ft span SITE IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY • 341 total pieces I. I. System Design ign EHS CAMPUS • 20,835 sf of panels II. II Structural Impact ct II III. Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S IMAGE COURTESY OF WHITING-TURNER 6

UMBC P erforming A rts & H umanities F acility UMBC P erforming A rts & H umanities F acility Prec ecas ast Faça çade e Des esign ign Baltimore, MD Baltimore, MD Courtney Glaub – Construction Management Courtney Glaub – Construction Management PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE: I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND STRU RUCT CTURAL RAL WEIGHT HTS: S: I. Locatio ion/I /Info II. Building ing Stats • Precast heavier than masonry wall II. II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE • Assume 6” thick panel with normal weight concrete I. I. desig ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact EXTERIO ERIOR BEAM LO LOADS: S: IV. Site Logist istics ics III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON • W16x26 = 129FT-K < 241FT-K I. I. Crane Logist stics ics • W14X22 = 129FT-K < 183FT-K II. II Schedule/C /Cost st Impact • W21X44 = 252FT-K < 510FT-K III. II Site Logist stic ics s SITE IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY EXTERI ERIOR OR BEAM DEFLECT LECTIO ION: N: I. I. System Design ign EHS CAMPUS II II. Structural Impact ct • Governing factor of design III. II Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact • Allowable deflection = L/240 IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis • Beams can withstand heavier precast load V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S 7

UMBC P erforming A rts & H umanities F acility UMBC P erforming A rts & H umanities F acility Prec ecas ast Faça çade e Des esign ign Baltimore, MD Baltimore, MD Courtney Glaub – Construction Management Courtney Glaub – Construction Management PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE: I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND I. Locatio ion/I /Info II. Building ing Stats STRUCTURAL AL PRECAS AST T CONNECTIO ION: N: II. II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE I. I. desig ign II II. Structural Impact ct • Panel spans from column to column III. II Schedule/C /Cost st Impact • Precast Tie-Back Connection to the exterior beams IV. Site Logist istics ics • Bearing/Adjustable Tie-Back Connection III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON • Fixed Tie-Back Connection I. I. Crane Logist stics ics II II. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact II III. Site Logist stic ics s SITE IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY I. I. System Design ign EHS CAMPUS II. II Structural Impact ct III. II Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S IMAGE COURTESY OF MID-ATLANTIC PRECAST ASSOCIATION IMAGES COURTESY OF MID-ATLANTIC PRECAST ASSOCIATION 8