ultra low latency connectivity for financial capital
play

Ultra-Low Latency Connectivity for Financial & Capital Markets - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ultra-Low Latency Connectivity for Financial & Capital Markets Visit us at www.ctamericas.com Global Financial & Trading Center Connectivity London Frankfurt Moscow Dalian Chicago Tokyo Zhengzhou Shanghai New York Shenzhen Los


  1. Ultra-Low Latency Connectivity for Financial & Capital Markets Visit us at www.ctamericas.com

  2. Global Financial & Trading Center Connectivity London Frankfurt Moscow Dalian Chicago Tokyo Zhengzhou Shanghai New York Shenzhen Los Angeles Hong Kong Singapore

  3. Ultra-Low Latency Route Availability SH - LON SH - CHI SH - FRK TOK - NY TOK - CHI London Moscow SH - HK Chicago Frankfurt HK - LON Beijing HK-MOS Tokyo HK - NY New York Shanghai Los Angeles SH - TOK Shenzhen Hong Kong HK - FRK SH - NY HK – SGP Shenzhen SZ – HK HK - LA Singapore HK - CHI SH - SGP Hong Kong

  4. Network Options  Multiprotocol label switching (MPLS) virtual private network (VPN): Get service level agreements with 99.9%- plus availability for secure converged data, voice and, video traffic-all on a single network connection.  Private line services: Support your global networking, security, and business continuity requirements with Ethernet Virtual Private Line, Ethernet Private Line, Optical Wavelength Service and International Private Line.  Internet bandwidth: Connect your users and bandwidth- intensive business applications, with superior peering and interconnectivity—plus reliability with a network \ recovery time of less than 50 milliseconds.

  5. Round Trip Expected Guaranteed Shanghai – Chicago 155ms 158ms Latencies Shanghai – New York 171ms 174ms China-USA Hong Kong – Chicago 172ms 175ms (POP-to-POP) Hong Kong – New York 190ms 193ms June 2018 Hong Kong – Los Angeles 140ms 143ms Tokyo – Chicago 126ms 129ms Japan-USA Tokyo – New York 143ms 146ms Shanghai – Frankfurt (TMP) 155ms 158ms Shanghai – Frankfurt (TSR+) 145ms 147ms Shanghai – London 148ms 151ms • Expected Latency figures are China - Euro Hong Kong – Frankfurt (TMP) 167ms 169ms based on SDH loopback test Hong Kong – Frankfurt (TSR+) 153ms 156ms (Bandwidth: E1, round trip delay) Hong Kong – London 159ms 162ms Hong Kong – Moscow 122ms 125ms Shenzhen – Hong Kong 1.82ms 2.00ms • Expected Latency figures are only obtained from tests between Shanghai – Hong Kong 25ms 26ms the selected POP in each city Shanghai – Singapore 53ms 55ms Inner Asia Shanghai – Tokyo 24ms 26ms Hong Kong – Singapore 30ms 32ms Tokyo – Singapore 65ms 67ms Shanghai – Dalian 35ms 37ms China Shanghai – Zhengzhou 19ms 20ms Mainland Zhengzhou – Dalian 36ms 37ms

  6. Shanghai – Chicago Primary Routing U.S.A. Latency: 155ms Hillsboro Chicago CLS TPE China Shanghai Chongming **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  7. Shanghai – New York Updated: 03-APR-2015 Primary Routing U.S.A. Latency: 171ms Hillsboro Chicago CLS TPE China New York Shanghai Chongming **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  8. Hong Kong – Chicago Updated: 14-APR-2015 U.S. Harbour Pointe PC-1 Japan Seattle Chicago Tokyo Ajigaura Chikura Primary Routing China Latency:172ms SJC Hong Kong Chung Hom Kok **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  9. Hong Kong – New York Updated: 03-APR-2015 U.S. Harbour Pointe PC-1 Japan Seattle New York Tokyo Chicago Ajigaura Chikura Primary Routing China Latency:190ms SJC Hong Kong Chung Hom Kok **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  10. Hong Kong – Los Angeles Updated: 14-APR-2017 U.S.A. Japan China Chikura Los Angeles Unity SJC Hong Kong Chung Hom Kok Primary Routing Latency: 140ms **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  11. Tokyo – Chicago Updated: 14-APR-2015 Primary Routing Latency: 126ms U.S.A. Harbour Pointe CLS Seattle Japan Chicago PC-1 China Tokyo **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  12. Tokyo – New York Updated: 03-APR-2015 Primary Routing Latency: 143ms U.S. Harbour Pointe CLS Seattle Japan Chicago PC-1 New York China Tokyo **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  13. Shanghai – Frankfurt (Transit-Mongolia) Updated: 14-APR-2015 Sweden Stockholm Russia Moscow Germany Frankfurt Mongolia Erenhot Primary Routing Beijing Latency: 158ms China Shanghai **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  14. Shanghai – Frankfurt (Transit-Kazakhstan) Updated: 07-APR-2016 Russia Kazakhstam Frankfurt Aketobe Urumqi China Primary Routing Shanghai Latency: 147ms **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  15. Shanghai – London (Transit-Mongolia) Updated: 14-APR-2015 Sweden Stockholm Moscow Russia U.K. London Mongolia Erenhot Primary Routing Beijing Latency: 148ms China Shanghai **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  16. Hong Kong – Frankfurt (Transit-Mongolia) Updated: 14-APR-2015 Sweden Stockholm Moscow Russia Germany Frankfurt Mongolia Erenhot Primary Routing Beijing Latency: 169ms China Hong Kong **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  17. Hong Kong – Frankfurt (Transit-Kazakhstan) Updated: 07-APR-2016 Russia Germany Kazakhstam Frankfurt Aketobe Urumqi China Primary Routing Latency: 156ms Hong Kong **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  18. Hong Kong – London (Transit-Mongolia) Updated: 14-APR-2015 Sweden Stockholm Moscow Russia U.K. London Mongolia Erenhot Primary Routing Beijing Latency: 159ms China Hong Kong **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  19. Hong Kong – Moscow (Transit-Mongolia) Updated: 08-APR-2016 Moscow Russia Mongolia Erenhot Primary Routing Beijing Latency: 122ms China Hong Kong **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  20. Shenzhen – Hong Kong (Terrestrial Cable) Updated: 14-APR-2015 Shenzhen Primary Routing Latency: 2ms New Territories Kowloon Hong Kong Hong Kong Island **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  21. Shanghai – Hong Kong Updated: 14-APR-2015 Wuhu Huzhou Anqing Shanghai Primary Routing Latency: Hangzhou Jiujiang 25ms Jinhua Nanchang Jian Nanping Ganzhou Guangzhou Shenzhen Hong Kong **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  22. Shanghai – Singapore Updated: 14-APR-2015 China Shanghai Shantou Hong Kong Primary Routing Latency: 53ms APCN-2 Malaysia Singapore **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  23. Shanghai – Tokyo Japan Kitaibaraki Tokyo Maruyama Chikura Primary Routing China Latency: 24ms Chongming Shanghai TPE **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  24. Hong Kong – Singapore (Equinix) Updated: 14-APR-2015 China Shantou Hong Kong Primary Routing Latency: 30ms EAC Singapore **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  25. Tokyo - Singapore Japan Kitaibaraki Tokyo China Maruyama Chikura Primary Routing Latency: 65ms APCN-2 Malaysia Singapore **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  26. Shanghai – Dalian Updated: 25-SEP-2015 Dalian Primary Routing Latency: 35ms Yantai Qingdao Rizhao Nantong Suzhou Shanghai **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  27. Shanghai – Zhengzhou Updated: 14-APR-2016 Zhengzhou Lianyungang Shangqiu Huaibei Xuzhou Yancheng Primary Routing Nantong Latency: Suzhou 19ms Shanghai **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  28. Zhengzhou-Dalian Updated: 14-APR-2016 Dalian Yantai Weifang Zibo Jinan Qingdao Zhengzhou Jining Zaozhuang Shangqiu Xuzhou Primary Routing Huaibei Latency: 36ms **Resilience options can be provided on individual case basis

  29. Failover Options TPE (Primary) Failover due to primary fault Shanghai Tokyo APCN2 (Backup) Automatic Restorative Failover TPE (Primary) Auto-recovery Shanghai Tokyo APCN2 (Backup) Manual Restorative Failover TPE (Primary) Manual-recovery Tokyo Shanghai APCN2 (Backup)

  30. Active Recovery After Failover Auto-Recovery Domestic SDH systems (International Usage) Auto-Recovery Overseas SDH systems (ONNET) Manual-Recovery on demand** **Manual-Recovery on demand OFFNET resources OR Submarine cable systems For OFFNET resources or some submarine cable systems which are not controlled by CT, active recovery procedure is as following: – 1. Trouble ticket issued by GCSC upon reception of customer’s requirement – 2. Negotiation with OFFNET vendor or submarine cable NOC to determine maintenance window after primary route fault has been fixed – 3. Switch customer circuit from backup route to primary route during maintenance window

  31. Proximity Hosting Transmission POPs Inside Key Securities Exchanges & Financial Data Centers CME Data Center, Aurora HKEx Data Center Tokyo Chuo Center 1/F SGX Data Center 60 Hudson St. **Extra latency will be introduced due to inner city optical fiber transmission

  32. Industry-leading APAC Latency Figures Route Latency Route Detail Capacity 189ms Via SJC+PC-1 CT 198ms via TPE CT Hong Kong – New 218ms via AAG Other York 205ms via EAC+UNITY Other 196ms via IA+PC-1 Other 2ms HK to SZ Direct CT Hong Kong – Shenzhen 8-10ms via Guangzhou Other 53ms APCN2 via Shantou CT 58ms via EAC Other Shanghai – Singapore 60ms via IA Other 62ms APCN2 via Hong Kong Other 159ms via Mongolia terrestrial cable CT Hong Kong – London 174ms via Mongolia terrestrial cable Other

Recommend


More recommend